posting the largest and most successful image editing company in the world has it wrong on common photography terms used. give us a break.
posting the largest and most successful image editing company in the world has it wrong on common photography terms used. give us a break.
posting the largest and most successful image editing company in the world has it wrong on common photography terms used.
Yes, I showed where the article is wrong. It has other things wrong as well in that article which have been commented on elsewhere.
@DonaldB has written:There information is accurate and well presented to the vast majority of photographers, from beginner to the professional.
www.adobe.com/au/creativecloud/photography/discover/exposure-in-photography.htmlISO setting can't be part of the exposure for a simple reason - it acts after exposure is ended. Are you having a good time helping to mislead photographers? :))
exposure is well defined and understood by 99.9% of photographers . just because your in the 0.1% means that you cant communicate with the other 99.9%
what is precipitation ?
the largest and most successful image editing company in the world has it wrong on common photography terms used.
Yes, easy. Here are a couple of examples how wrong they can be:
"When you do override your camera and choose a specific ISO you’ll notice that it impacts the aperture and shutter speed needed for a well exposed shot. For example – if you bumped your ISO up from 100 to 400 you’ll notice that you can shoot at higher shutter speeds and/or smaller apertures."
"Looking at our water analogy one last time, if we were to increase the pressure of the water that is being pumped through the pipe we would, of course, be able to collect more water. In photography this translates to sensitivity of the camera sensor to light. A higher ISO number indicates greater sensitivity of the sensor, meaning more light is being absorbed."
exposure is well defined and understood by 99.9% of photographers .
Maybe so, but you, you ether belong to 0.1%, or simply having fun trying to confuse others. This is going out of hand, by the way.
@DonaldB has written:the largest and most successful image editing company in the world has it wrong on common photography terms used.
Yes, easy. Here is another example how wrong they can be:
"When you do override your camera and choose a specific ISO you’ll notice that it impacts the aperture and shutter speed needed for a well exposed shot. For example – if you bumped your ISO up from 100 to 400 you’ll notice that you can shoot at higher shutter speeds and/or smaller apertures."
which part dont you understand.?. if you want to shoot sports be my guest and shoot at iso 50 f22 at 5 secs. cant wait to see you images
@DonaldB has written:the largest and most successful image editing company in the world has it wrong on common photography terms used.
Yes, easy. Here is another example how wrong they can be:
"When you do override your camera and choose a specific ISO you’ll notice that it impacts the aperture and shutter speed needed for a well exposed shot. For example – if you bumped your ISO up from 100 to 400 you’ll notice that you can shoot at higher shutter speeds and/or smaller apertures."
People communicating with DonaldB need to remember that when he uses the word exposure in sentences he means it to mean how light or dark an image looks on the medium the image is being viewed on. That is obviously a misconception but his choice and many other people's choice to make.
He doesn't accept the correct technical definition of exposure - amount of light that struck the sensor per unit area while the shutter was open - which again is his choice to make.
From the Collins dictionary:
In photography, the exposure is the amount of light that is allowed to enter a camera when taking a photograph.
@DonaldB has written:exposure is well defined and understood by 99.9% of photographers .
Maybe so, but you, you ether belong to 0.1%, or simply having fun trying to confuse others. This is going out of hand, by the way.
It was established earlier this thread that this is clearly a troll thread.
@IliahBorg has written: @DonaldB has written:the largest and most successful image editing company in the world has it wrong on common photography terms used.
Yes, easy. Here is another example how wrong they can be:
"When you do override your camera and choose a specific ISO you’ll notice that it impacts the aperture and shutter speed needed for a well exposed shot. For example – if you bumped your ISO up from 100 to 400 you’ll notice that you can shoot at higher shutter speeds and/or smaller apertures."People communicating with DonaldB need to remember that when he uses the word exposure in sentences he means it to mean how light or dark an image looks on the medium the image is being viewed on. That is obviously a misconception but his choice and many other people's choice to make.
He doesn't accept the correct technical definition of exposure - amount of light that struck the sensor per unit area while the shutter was open - which again is his choice to make.
i or anybody else dont need your pathetic comments .just stick to the topic discussed.
@IliahBorg has written: @DonaldB has written:the largest and most successful image editing company in the world has it wrong on common photography terms used.
Yes, easy. Here is another example how wrong they can be:
"When you do override your camera and choose a specific ISO you’ll notice that it impacts the aperture and shutter speed needed for a well exposed shot. For example – if you bumped your ISO up from 100 to 400 you’ll notice that you can shoot at higher shutter speeds and/or smaller apertures."which part dont you understand.?
LOL.
No, how don't you see that they forgot to mention light? You posted a counter-example to what they are saying just hours ago.
i or anybody else dont need your pathetic comments .just stick to the topic discussed.
I have been sticking to the topic discussed. We're discussing in part the lack of accuracy in the article you linked to.
Which sentences in my posts do you believe are not true?
From the Collins dictionary:
In photography, the exposure is the amount of light that is allowed to enter a camera when taking a photograph.
what do you put in your car, Fuel, petrol, gas.? what is a product of trees wood ,timber, lumber ?
exposure "the state of having no protection from something harmful."
@AlanSh has written:From the Collins dictionary:
In photography, the exposure is the amount of light that is allowed to enter a camera when taking a photograph.
what do you put in your car, Fuel, petrol, gas.? what is a product of trees wood ,timber, lumber ?
Yep, this is definitely a troll thread 🙂
@DavidMillier has written:You can't change the sensitivity of the sensor, it's fixed.
be more specific which part of the sensor is fixed ?
Huh? The sensitivity. Boosting ISO does not make the sensor more sensitive, it adjusts post shutter closing processing. But we know this, we posted a lot of posts making this clear.
@DonaldB has written: @AlanSh has written:From the Collins dictionary:
In photography, the exposure is the amount of light that is allowed to enter a camera when taking a photograph.
what do you put in your car, Fuel, petrol, gas.? what is a product of trees wood ,timber, lumber ?
Yep, this is definitely a troll thread 🙂
exposure ,the state of having no protection from something harmful. terms have different meanings, which part dont you understand ?
@DavidMillier has written: @DonaldB has written:There information is accurate and well presented to the vast majority of photographers, from beginner to the professional.
www.adobe.com/au/creativecloud/photography/discover/exposure-in-photography.html#:~:text=Exposure%20is%20the%20amount%20of,highlights%20and%20faded%2Dlooking%20images.I have used LR since the original beta test programme. I never took to Photoshop (I had v 6.01!). But there is now an issue with Adobe products I'm not prepared to tolerate: the holding of my years of edits to hostage via the subscription model. So, I'm stuck with the last perpetual licence version 6.14. I use this for my back catalogue up to 2019.
For photos later than this I have escaped the proprietary software treadmill by moving to Open Source: Ubuntu Linux O/S and darktable to replace LR.
It has taken a while for me to get the hang of darktable. It is a complex product with little done to dumb down the user interface - in some ways it reminds me more of the complexity of Photoshop than Lightroom. Also, in the period I started using it, it was going through a major revamp of both its processing modules (shifting to a scene referred model) and its UI (the addition of major customisation options), so every 6 months something major changed. It's settled down now and I have refined my copy to a simplified workflow and a highly customised UI.
There is a tendency by those who don't use open source to dismiss it as some kind of freebie and therefore feeble alternative that doesn't provide the professional features of "proper" software. So wrong! darktable is an impressively powerful product once you figure out how to use it. You shouldn't really do feature by feature comparisons between products because that leads to dismissing a product when you find something missing or different from what you've grown used to relying on. Judge products by what they can do rather than what they don't do or do differently. Often it's just a case of learning a new workflow.
And darktable is an impressive product. In many ways more powerful than LR 6.14 (and even what I have seen of the newer versions). In particular, it has some features that have transformed the way I work. 1) The masking tools - present in just about every module 2) The module re-use feature (a tool like curves can have as many separate instances as you want working at the same time and in combination with the masking tools you can apply as many curves as you like to different parts of the image. The same goes for almost every other tool (local contrast, sharpening, noise reduction, tone equalizer, contrast equalizer, color zones etc etc). In some ways, these two features working together are a bit like Photoshop layers in an entirely non-destructive raw environment.
The only real weakness I've found is printing. Linux printing is tricky. You can pay for a program like Turbo print that sorts it all out, but I prefer to swap over to Win/LR to do my printing.
Oh dear, this sounds a bit like an advertisement for darktable. No matter, it's free.
I've used DarkTable. Impressive editor but it doesn't hold a candle to the overall functionality and usability of Adobe Lr / Ps combo, whatever what one thinks of their subscription model, their products are excellent and constantly improving, There is no product that can compete with the quality of the Adobe Photography Suite combo of LR and PS.
Which version of darktable (the brand name uses all lowercase)? It has changed a huge amount over the v3 versions. It's almost an entirely new product compared to v2.
exposure ,the state of having no protection from something harmful. terms have different meanings, which part dont you understand ?
Yep, and I posted the misconception you use for the meaning and I posted what I and many other people accept as the meaning.
We all make our own choices 😊