which is what we are discussing Diffraction limited also pixel bleeding, noise control. larger pixels win on all 3 . stack those 3 items 100 times and you get a less cleaner less detailed image from smaller pixels.
sounds like computational photography. i have no problem with DR. do i spent $1500 on a new microscope objective or keep what i have is my delemma atm 😁
well did my final test 4x amscope microscope objective 20meg em12 fly head eye detail , sony a74 apsc mode 14 meg image. the sony absolutly destroyed the smaller sensor pixels on detail sharpness and contrast even magnifying it to suit the 20 meg file. then used the 10 x olympus objective pulled back to (6x aprox )the same framing as the 20 meg olympus image. the sony just didnt just destroy it, it abliterate the smaller pixels. its on another planet.
and the winner is .......................................................................... me of cause 😁😜
a74 crop mode 14 meg Vers a6300 24 meg 10x olympus microscope objective same dead fly 😒 he was alive but i acidently squashed him transfering him to the studio. at least he was still 🤨🙄 identical lighting and processing. and 100 images each stack. electronic shutter remote shutter control so no vibration at all.
the a74 is just an amazing camera 10 frames per second no blackout unlimited buffer took a fraction of the time to shoot the image compared to the a6300.