• Photobygmshelp_outline
    649 posts
    2 years ago

    That RF 24-105L is most of the time glued to our R, but as mentioned when we go light it will be swapped with one of the 24-240s
    And you right the RF version is better than both EF versions, but I have to use the EF versions on our analog Eos camera's ๐Ÿ˜‰

  • Ghundredpanorama_fish_eye
    746 posts
    2 years ago

    Yeah, for sure. It's scientifically proven that the mirror reflects most of that magic fairy pixel dust away from the sensor, resulting in a noticeable loss of image quality.

  • CrashpcCZpanorama_fish_eye
    360 posts
    2 years ago

    You are being silly. There are valid reasons for getting better images.

  • JohnSheehyRevpanorama_fish_eye
    545 posts
    2 years ago

    "Mirror-less" does not just mean "without a mirror"; it also means things like "using the imaging sensor for metering and AF, and the availability of variable brightness in the EVF or LCD as a tool". Surely @davidwien did not mean the former.

  • 2 years ago

    Yes! โ€œMirrorless Systemโ€ implies more than just โ€œwithout a mirrorโ€. ๐Ÿ˜€

    David

  • Ghundredpanorama_fish_eye
    746 posts
    2 years ago

    I think someone should either put a disclaimer at the start of the thread, or at least a proper definition that would hold up in a court of law as to what really defines a mirrorless camera, or, as seems traditional here, start a thread on the definition of mirrorless, and then argue for the weeks and multiple hundreds of posts as to the the meaning and intent.
    That might even make you look clever ๐Ÿ˜

  • Photobygmshelp_outline
    649 posts
    2 years ago

    Actually I did own a Mirrorless Canon Eos camera a few years ago ๐Ÿ˜‹
    Even before the M and R series existed

    (one of our Canon Eos 1N camera shattered it's mirror after firing a short burst (6 frames/sec) with the Powerbooster attached)

    ๐Ÿ˜‚

  • JohnSheehyRevpanorama_fish_eye
    545 posts
    2 years ago

    Did you get 7 years of bad exposure?