Maybe too colourful, what do you think ?
No!
Number 1 with its glorious red is the best (IMHO), but I think you've included too much in the image.
A suggestion? . . .
Rich
Cropping the image ↑ has destroyed the perspective completely.
For viewing here on the web, I have resized it to 25% and added one pixel externally to the image borders to preserve and show the shadow gaps of the structural panels.
This resized image is 503 pixels by 752 pixels.
It's tall and skinny and not very close to the golden ratio, but I like it, and it would work well as a gallery photo framed minimally in your next exhibition. :-)
Rules for those that like to observe them...
The Golden Ratio in Photography: A Complete Guide.
www.shutterstock.com/blog/what-is-the-golden-ratio
Daneland wrote: Maybe too colourful, what do you think ?
Either the guy is wearing too much foundation on his face, or you have overcooked him in Photoshop. lol
I'm not a great lover of analyzing photographs too much, and some of the corny written descriptions on this forum make me want to run a mile. lol
Anyway... the curved flagstones are funky, and the two short vertical yellow repeater lines draw the viewer's attention to the manhole cover and then to the subject. The silver door latch on the extreme left is interesting too in a minimalist kind of way. I sure hope that the tobacco that he is hand-rolling is legal!