Do see a lot of missing Exif data at the moment. Not only in my own posts that should have more Exif info but also in other threads
Feb. 26, 2024
16
-
-
Same here, some of them are not available but most of them are.
-
It was a fix I asked for - but it needs modifying. I've contacted Martin about it.
Alan
-
I’m curious about what you wanted to ‘fix’ -EXIF seemed to be working well as it was. Most of my posts recently have had the meaningless EXIF lines, but one, yesterday, was mostly correct.
-
Output from ON1 Raw export wasn't correct. So I asked Martin to look at it - which he did, but it messed up other bits. It will get fixed.
Alan
-
Whilst we’re discussing things that don’t quite work as they should, is it just me or…
In the ‘Threads’ view, an unread thread shows a blue flag. When the thread is read, the flag turns pale grey. If I click the ‘Mark all read’ button, any remaining blue flags turn dark grey, but, when I refresh the page, the dark grey flags turn back to blue and the threads are once again unread. Am I doing something wrong?
-
You can't do it from "All Threads". It has to be done from each forum or (I think) from each section.
Alan
-
Pardon my ignorance, Alan, but what is a "section"?
-
Sorry - my silly words. A collection of forums. "News & Discussion", "Photographic Genres" etc.
-
Probably still my fault but I can’t get ‘Mark all read’ to work properly on any group of unread threads…
-
Let me check
Alan
-
I went into 'Documentary and Street' and clicked on 'Mark all read'. Waited about 20 seconds and that worked OK. Tried it with 'Technical Discussions' - also worked OK after about 30 seconds.
I then went into a parent heading - this time 'News & Discussions'. Did the same thing. That did not seem to work, but I may not have left it long enough.
I think at the moment, you have to wait while the mark all read macro does its stuff. I know it's a kludge because the original code didn't have that option, so Martin made something that loops round marking each thread as read - and it's not fast.
Alan
-
And back to the Exif, right now is it even worse,
Many photos do now show only : ISO100 28mm 1/640s 𝑓/4.5 (example) or Camera: unknown/undefined ISO20 4mm (35mm eq. 27mm) 1/537s 𝑓/1.8 or nothing at all -
Can you post an example of an image which has 'bad' Exif displayed? We can fix it, but I need concrete examples.
Alan
-
One example is the image in this thread, no Exif data is shown but should be there (Canon Eos 5D IV Sigma S 60-600mm etc)
See also the Canon thread as one example A few of the latest added images.
dprevived.com/t/your-canon-photos-no-43-25th-february-to-2nd-march-2024/5599/post/73187/
dprevived.com/t/your-canon-photos-no-43-25th-february-to-2nd-march-2024/5599/post/73181/From the Photo of the week thread:
dprevived.com/t/photo-of-the-week-competition-25th-feb-2024/5602/post/73186/
dprevived.com/t/photo-of-the-week-competition-25th-feb-2024/5602/post/73126/Edit another thread:
dprevived.com/t/sunday-cat-854-february-25-2024/5600/post/73090/and:
dprevived.com/t/this-week-through-your-eyes-2024224/5594/post/73097/
dprevived.com/t/this-week-through-your-eyes-2024224/5594/post/73007/ -
I seem to remember that I stripped the EXIF out of the Venice photo.
-
OK - I'll get Martin on the case. Thanks.
Alan
