you are on the new server domainname will switch later
If you can not login please clear cookies
chevron_left
chevron_right
The-Photo forum
  • Home
  • Forums
    • theatersImage Discussions arrow_forward
      • chat_bubbleChallenges arrow_forward
        • camera Edit me an Image
        • camera Photo of the Week
      • chat_bubbleHave your photos Critiqued arrow_forward
        • camera Wednesday C&C
      • Showcase your Photos
      • chat_bubbleWeekly & Topic Image Threads arrow_forward
        • camera Abstract/Experimental
        • camera B&W Threads
        • camera Sunday Cats!
        • camera Weekly Collegial forum
        • camera Daily Outing
        • camera This week through your eyes
        • camera Landscape
        • camera Macro & Close Up
        • camera Street Photography
    • theatersMiscellaneous forums arrow_forward
      • Photo Hardware Discussions
      • Industry News
    • theatersOther Photography Talk arrow_forward
      • Photo History Trivia
      • Open discussions
      • Technical Discussions
    • Site Discussions
    • theatersWelcome arrow_forward
      • chat_bubbleForum Guidelines arrow_forward
        • camera Misplaced Posts
  • Threads
  • Users
  • Web Site
  • message
  • group
  • chevron_right Threads
  • label Other Other Photography Talk
  • label Open Open discussions

Google and Artificial Intelligence ...

xpatUSA
Jan. 26, 2026
chat_bubble_outline 8
arrow_downward
  • link
    xpatUSA
    Members 1290 posts
    Jan. 26, 2026, 6:47 p.m. Jan. 26, 2026, 6:47 p.m.
    link

    Recently, searching with Google gets you what looks like a ChatGPT response with some suggested links thrown in.

    About a year or more ago, I was banned for life from discuss dot pixls dot us for consistently mentioning AI.

    Now that Googling is no longer a purely AI-free activity (if it ever was), would mentioning Google results now be frowned upon there? Kind of like - would the provenance of any statement have to be acceptable to their most overbearing Mods?

    I believe that most, if not all, members here are capable of viewing/reading AI output appropriately. Therefore, I do hope that the paranoid attitude seen on other sites will not creep in here.

  • link
    ArvoJ
    Team 1120 posts
    Jan. 26, 2026, 7:18 p.m. Jan. 26, 2026, 7:18 p.m.
    link

    No problems with AI output - if it is marked as such.

    Many sites frown upon posting AI answers as poster own ones. Usually it is clear that post is AI generated, but as LLMs advance, in (near) future this may not be so.

    xpatUSA likes this.

    favorite 1

  • link
    davidwien
    Team 2005 posts
    Jan. 26, 2026, 7:40 p.m. Jan. 26, 2026, 7:40 p.m.
    link

    Google has been rendered less useful and less trustworthy by the incorporation of AI.

    David

    xpatUSA likes this.

    favorite 1

  • link
    AlanSh
    Forum Admin 3827 posts
    Jan. 26, 2026, 7:41 p.m. Jan. 26, 2026, 7:41 p.m.
    link

    As long as there is attribution on any quote you give, you can use AI. Obviously, if we see "AI" as the author, there's a 75% chance it's wrong 😁

    xpatUSA likes this.

    favorite 1

  • link
    WolfsHead
    Members 254 posts
    Jan. 26, 2026, 8:17 p.m. Jan. 26, 2026, 8:17 p.m.
    link

    I remember reading recently (can’t remember where) that, on balance AI is 69% accurate. Imagine, for example, the consequences if the purchase documents for your house, or the technical manual for a plane (or any one of a thousand other examples) were only 69% accurate. I must say though, that the AI replace in the latest version of Photoshop is quite stunning and it’s improved quite a few photos that I’d discarded…

    Best wishes

    A

  • link
    xpatUSA
    Members 1290 posts
    Jan. 26, 2026, 8:27 p.m. Jan. 26, 2026, 8:27 p.m.
    link
    @AlanSh has written:

    As long as there is attribution on any quote you give, you can use AI. Obviously, if we see "AI" as the author, there's a 75% chance it's wrong 😁

    Thanks, Alan.

  • link
    RichardA
    Members 87 posts
    Jan. 27, 2026, 9:56 a.m. Jan. 27, 2026, 9:56 a.m.
    link
    @davidwien has written:

    Google has been rendered less useful and less trustworthy by the incorporation of AI.

    David

    I don't really know if it is any less useful than it has been for a long time really. I've been trying to use it as little as possible for a long time.

  • link
    ArvoJ
    Team 1120 posts
    Jan. 27, 2026, 10:59 a.m. Jan. 27, 2026, 10:59 a.m.
    link

    Actually, for non-english me their AI snippets display some usable [search] keywords immediately. Earlier I had to find wikipedia page and gather keywords there, now this step is often not needed.
    Of course AI provided information is even less usable than wikipedia one. Unless they just copy wikipedia page :)

  • link
    davidwien
    Team 2005 posts
    Jan. 27, 2026, 1:07 p.m. Jan. 27, 2026, 1:07 p.m.
    link
    @RichardA has written:
    @davidwien has written:

    Google has been rendered less useful and less trustworthy by the incorporation of AI.

    David

    I don't really know if it is any less useful than it has been for a long time really. I've been trying to use it as little as possible for a long time.

    What do you use instead?

    David

arrow_upward

There are no more posts in this thread.

  • DPRevived.com & the-photo.org are owned and operated by The Photographer's Foundation Limited, registered in England, company number 14795583. Contact us here https://the-photo.org/contact.html
powered by misago