The game is, can you guess the EXIF (which has been stripped) from the photo.
Starting clue - taken on a Z6 - SOOC apart from stripping the EXIF.
Looking for focal length, f-number, exposure time, ISO.
Bob,
I think this is a terrific topic, and I hope you will make it a staple thread.
Steve Thomas
My guess fwiw since there are way too many unknowns and variables 😎
f/5 - f/11
1/800s - 1/100s
ISO 100 - ISO 200
50mm eq - 600mm eq
But then if the photographer accidentally had say ISO 400 or higher set, then shutter speeds would be faster.
It will be interesting to see how this thread develops 🙂
My guess: 50mm f/8 1/500s ISO 100
That's why it's 'guess the ISO'
Somewhere in that range!
Let's see how it works, and if people enjoy. I might need to put in some more clues.
It's a good guess.
Yes, but the iso used for that shot could potentially have been anything up to 800 or maybe even 1600.
That is why I put my guess for each parameter as a range.
@bobn2 has written: @DannoLeftForums has written:My guess fwiw since there are way too many unknowns and variables 😎
That's why it's 'guess the ISO'
Yes, but the iso used for that shot could potentially have been anything up to 800 or maybe even 1600.
That is why I put my guess for each parameter as a range.
1/5000 sec f8 raw lifted 5 stops in post 😉
It's sooc, not processed in post from raw.
@bobn2 has written: @DannoLeftForums has written:My guess fwiw since there are way too many unknowns and variables 😎
That's why it's 'guess the ISO'
Yes, but the iso used for that shot could potentially have been anything up to 800 or maybe even 1600.
That is why I put my guess for each parameter as a range.
I think the way I would have gone about it, if doing rather than setting, would be to try to guess f-number from DOF, then exposure from noise - and hence shutter speed (something to do with sunny-16) then ISO.
If I do another one, maybe I'll find a photo with a clue to shutter speed.
It will be interesting to see how this thread develops 🙂
There was some prescience there. Of course, the triangle trolls will have to chip in with their usual disruption.
@DannoLeftForums has written:It will be interesting to see how this thread develops 🙂
There was some prescience there. Of course, the triangle trolls will have to chip in with their usual disruption.
did you HAVE to leave Danno's stupid irritating nothing-to-do-with-photography GIF in the quote?!!
did you HAVE to leave Danno's stupid irritating nothing-to-do-with-photography GIF in the quote?!!
No.
Bob,
I think this is a terrific topic, and I hope you will make it a staple thread.
Steve Thomas
Sorry Bob.
This lasted all of one day.
I thought it would have made a great learning tool..
Steve Thomas
Sorry Bob.
This lasted all of one day.
I thought it would have made a great learning tool..Steve Thomas
So would I, and some fun. Why not have a go? Maybe others will try.
[deleted]
@bobn2 has written: @TomAxford has written:My guess: 50mm f/8 1/500s ISO 100
It's a good guess.
I think it is longer than 50mm, probably not by much. There is some softness in the lower left corner which with normal to wide FL could have been avoided.
Well and correctly reasoned.