• Members 33 posts
    May 5, 2023, 10:03 p.m.

    My abstracts are almost always created from a single image, of an organic object out in the natural world. But showing the whole object can be problematic, as it will never fill a retangular (or square) FOV without cropping, which has its own problems. Sometimes placing an irregular object in a black or white field will work; other times that approach is not satisfactory.So I developed a method to combine the 'interesting' parts of two different images, which I will call 'melding' (apologies to Star Trek), to get a square or rectangular image.

    Here's an example. These images are so detailed that I am showing both the full image, down-rezzed, and a 100% crop,.

    Full image, 1/4 scale:
    IMG_17411732meld-thumb.jpg

    100% crop of upper right:

    IMG_17411732meldCr.jpg

    David

    IMG_17411732meld-thumb.jpg

    JPG, 2.4 MB, uploaded by DavidWright on May 5, 2023.

    IMG_17411732meldCr.jpg

    JPG, 3.8 MB, uploaded by DavidWright on May 5, 2023.

  • Members 523 posts
    May 6, 2023, 11:21 a.m.

    Mesmerizing! I can only imagine what kind of experience a wall-sized print would give me. I was going to ask about your process, but then I read in a previous topic of yours that you keep that a secret 😃 So I'll just enjoy the results and the little hints you've shared. Many thanks!

  • Members 33 posts
    May 6, 2023, 3:38 p.m.

    I usually print ones I like at 36" x 24" (then heat-pressed onto foamboard), but they could easily go bigger. Two panels (giving 48" x 36") will look crisp even with very close inspection.

    They look even better on aluminum, but that is way more expensive (3-4x).

    David