• DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2366 posts
    2 years ago

    after last nights testing, its as close as it gets. at least fast raw viewer is getting used for these conversations. its been a valuable tool so far.

  • IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    Sorry I don't understand your answer.
    We can continue when you will decide to post raw files, exposed by zebras and overexposed relative to zebras, under various lights, regular scenes as well as red flowers and blue flowers, a flower filling the frame.

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2366 posts
    2 years ago

    Sorry I don't understand your answer.

    sorry its as close to perfect as posable.

    id like to post a utube of the lcd . but sorry it has my full name attached and not prepared to disclose for obvious reasons. i would like to but certain members have ruined the trust.
    i havnt a tripod with me so cant even take a snapshot with my phone of the rear lcd capturing the zebras. you will have to wait till im home from my camping trip.

  • IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    Don't even bring this up.

    You obviously misread the situation.

  • BillFerrishelp_outline
    369 posts
    2 years ago

    All ISO invariant ranges start somewhere.

  • BillFerrishelp_outline
    369 posts
    2 years ago

    Any camera having a range of ISOs across which it is invariant...is invariant.

  • Quarkcharmedpanorama_fish_eye
    184 posts
    2 years ago

    Invariance it's always defined within some domain under certain transformations, so it was a moot point to start with. It's fine to define invariance of noise when ISO setting changes within a specified range.

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2366 posts
    2 years ago

    This explains what Sony have done to resolve the raw file histogram issue. this is not a replacement for Jims excellent article. but explains a few un-answered questions about Sonys latest camera inclusions.