That's what a lot of people say, OM camera can get to a second of 2.
I can my gx85 and 12-32 to only 1 forth of a second of stable image(about the same with my x-t2 and 16-50), i wonder if i switch to e-m10 ii would make a different. I understand OM camera doesn't do duel IS with panasonic lens.
Thanks
Just realize wrong place, is there anyway to move it?
I can only compare OM-1 to EM-1, and OM-1 of course is a lot better, as could be expected given EM-1 is old.
I've lost my steady hands and was surprised what I could get way with when I got the OM.
The is 4 sec with a 50mm lens. I just wanted to see if the (new) lens could make stars, didn't look at the shutter speed and thought this won't go well when the shutter went black.
Could be sharper maybe, but good enough for a person with shaky hands and no support.
impressive. Is this only ibis or both in-lens and ibis?
Only IBIS. It's the Loawa 50mm macro.
This is at more reasonable 1.6 sec with the same lens. It was too large for the forum. I cropped it rather than resize it, cut maybe 25% off.
I've seen people pull off much longer times, but they probably have steady hands. I don't.
I've recently learnt there's a "shake aid" that can be turned on in the viewfinder. It shows a square and some dots and visualizes how big the shake is. Once I understood how it works I find it quite helpful. The above shots were taken before this discovery. I've discovered that when I think I hold steady it isn't always so!
Yes it's a lot better and the reason I got an OM1. Handheld computational ND filter for 6 seconds on 12-100 Pro at 12mm. Magic!
6 seconds, no fxcking way, did you lean on something?
