Kodak DCS 200 (1992) / Kodak DCS Pro 14n (2003)

A nod to history

Comparison between the Kodak DCS 200 (1992) and the Kodak DCS Pro 14n (2003)
Kodak DCS 200 (1992) the second Digital Reflex, the first truly transportable!
and the Kodak DCS Pro 14n (2003) the first Kodak 24x36 Digital.

Kodak DCS 200 (1992) / Kodak DCS Pro 14n (2003) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

Kodak DCS 200 (1992) / Kodak DCS Pro 14n (2003)

www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157719668781183

Kodak DCS 200 (1992)
13.8x9.2, 1.5 MP sensor (1524x1012 )
The second DSLR (the first truly transportable)
Price: $9,000 USD
Photos taken with the nikkor AF 35-70mm f/3.3-4.5
(with a multiplication factor of 2.6)
50-400 ISO
_______

Kodak DCS Pro 14n (2003)
13.9 MP 24x36 sensor ( 4536 x 3024 )
The first digital Kodak 24x36
Price $4,000 USD
Photos taken with nikkor AF 85mm f/1.8
(with a multiplication factor of 1.0) FF
80-400 (800) ISO
*Upgraded (Kodak Professional DCS Pro 14nx ) for $1800 USD ( 4500 x 3000 )
ISO 160-1600 ... & special (ISO 6-50)

N°01 Kodak DCS 200 (1992) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

N°01 Kodak DCS Pro 14n (2003) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

No, the Kodak Pro SLR/c didn't sell very well, and it's rare to find a good example on eBay at a reasonable price.
In my opinion, the Kodak Pro SLR/c is the result of Kodak's catastrophic situation in 2004.

Question, why did you reproduce my entire post, including the three photographs?
It's totally useless and can become unpleasant if several people make the same mistake.
It happens so often on DPRevived.

Kodak DCS 200 (1992) 100% / Kodak DCS Pro 14n (2003) 100% by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

Kodak DCS 200 (1992) / Kodak DCS Pro 14n (2003) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr