That's a great looking camera. Some simple cosmetic upgrades make it look much more expensive than the original Fujifilm model, which is just as well... ;-)
I went down the rabbit hole looking for one of these a while ago. What a delusional mindset some sellers have. Leica's name on it or not, it's now technically the equivalence of garbage. Good luck finding a sucker willing to pay a premium just to own what's basically a branded paperweight.
The Digilux 2 or the 3? Yes, they are overpriced but people is willing to pay for them, like the "X100 phenomenon", I just saw a few version 1 on ebay asking between 700-900!!
I was looking for any of them for giggles. All crazy price tags I saw. Asking and someone paying are not equal. Besides some tiny niche of very obsessive collectors, how big do you think the demographic to pay hundreds of dollars for a Lecia camera that makes one megabyte images is?
Except that vintage digital cameras are cool right now, so they will probably have the last laugh. One man's garbage... I also find it funny that you wanted this garbage until is was too expensive.
My own Digilux. Once carried daily in pre-iPhone times, now serves as a shelf decoration. It needs a new battery and, unfortunately. I think the charger may have been techcycled during a pandemic cleanout.
I purchased the camera new from B&H in New York. The sales associate didn't want to sell it to me — insisting that I should buy the Fuji version. Same camera. I wanted the red badge as a digital complement to my M6 and I was happy enough to pay the difference for my vanity. He finally relented and allowed me to make my purchase when I explained that I was into leather. My jacket, and the dress worn by the woman accompanying me, served to reinforce this claim. I showed my appreciation for his efforts to protect my interests by letting him sell me the accessory package even though I didn't actually need anything from it. (That's how B&H made its money at the time, no margin in cameras themselves, and I believe that associates were measured on this conversion.)
The camera was objectively terrible, at least for my purposes. Laggy and a poor low-light performer. It remains a favorite anyhow.