• Members 1469 posts
    April 19, 2023, 7:42 p.m.

    Leica digilux (1998)
    1,500,000 pixels (1280x1024)
    2 MByte SmartMedia
    The First Digital Leica
    $800.00 USD

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51194099614_b7f3b56080_k.jpg
    Leica digilux (1998)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    My Little History of Digital Compacts

  • Members 10 posts
    April 19, 2023, 8:04 p.m.

    That's a great looking camera. Some simple cosmetic upgrades make it look much more expensive than the original Fujifilm model, which is just as well... ;-)

  • Members 1469 posts
    April 19, 2023, 8:29 p.m.

    Expensive and Leica, go well together 😎

  • Members 284 posts
    April 20, 2023, 1:41 a.m.

    I think is odd they release a "Digilux" and then 3 years later a "Digilux 1"

    .Screenshot 2023-04-19 at 19.39.52.png

    Screenshot 2023-04-19 at 19.39.52.png

    PNG, 929.4 KB, uploaded by Foskito on April 20, 2023.

  • Members 1469 posts
    April 20, 2023, 1:55 a.m.

    In addition, the Leica Digilux 1 is the fourth 🙄

    Leica digilux (1998)
    Leica digilux Zoom (1999)
    Leica digilux 4.3 (2000)
    Leica digilux 1 (2002)
    Leica D-LUX (2003)
    Leica digilux 2 (2003)

    And finally in 2006 the magnificent Leica M8 ❤️

  • Members 284 posts
    April 22, 2023, 3:26 p.m.

    There is also the Digilux 3! Which was the Lumix L1 rebadged. Oh yes, I love my M8, even more than my M9P 🥰

  • Members 1469 posts
    April 22, 2023, 4:01 p.m.

    Yes, I have the Panasonic version

    Panasonic Lumix DMC-L1 (2006) first 4/3
    With a superb zoom signed Leica

    Even today the Leica version sells for two to three times more expensive on eBay than the Lumix version.
    The Leica logo is expensive! 😎

    live.staticflickr.com/1900/44771570501_85a620053b_k.jpg
    Lumix DMC-L1 (2006)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    In the end, rather than a mediocre camera, pretty from the outside, but with rather questionable performance!

  • Members 284 posts
    April 22, 2023, 6:50 p.m.

    Yes... the Digilux 3 never got the "cult" following as the Digilux 2.

  • Members 861 posts
    April 24, 2023, 1:21 a.m.

    I went down the rabbit hole looking for one of these a while ago. What a delusional mindset some sellers have. Leica's name on it or not, it's now technically the equivalence of garbage. Good luck finding a sucker willing to pay a premium just to own what's basically a branded paperweight.

  • Members 284 posts
    April 24, 2023, 1:31 a.m.

    The Digilux 2 or the 3? Yes, they are overpriced but people is willing to pay for them, like the "X100 phenomenon", I just saw a few version 1 on ebay asking between 700-900!!

  • Members 1469 posts
    April 24, 2023, 2:17 a.m.

    Glad to have paid my little X100 $340.00 USD in 2016 😎

  • Members 861 posts
    April 24, 2023, 3:34 a.m.

    I was looking for any of them for giggles. All crazy price tags I saw. Asking and someone paying are not equal. Besides some tiny niche of very obsessive collectors, how big do you think the demographic to pay hundreds of dollars for a Lecia camera that makes one megabyte images is?

  • Members 30 posts
    April 25, 2023, 3:41 p.m.

    Except that vintage digital cameras are cool right now, so they will probably have the last laugh. One man's garbage... I also find it funny that you wanted this garbage until is was too expensive.

  • Members 284 posts
    April 25, 2023, 6:49 p.m.

    Just a couple of days ago I saw completed auctions on ebay of the original X100, sold between 700 and 900 bucks. Is all about the hype!!

  • Members 535 posts
    April 25, 2023, 7:27 p.m.

    IMG_1310.jpeg

    My own Digilux. Once carried daily in pre-iPhone times, now serves as a shelf decoration. It needs a new battery and, unfortunately. I think the charger may have been techcycled during a pandemic cleanout.

    I purchased the camera new from B&H in New York. The sales associate didn't want to sell it to me — insisting that I should buy the Fuji version. Same camera. I wanted the red badge as a digital complement to my M6 and I was happy enough to pay the difference for my vanity. He finally relented and allowed me to make my purchase when I explained that I was into leather. My jacket, and the dress worn by the woman accompanying me, served to reinforce this claim. I showed my appreciation for his efforts to protect my interests by letting him sell me the accessory package even though I didn't actually need anything from it. (That's how B&H made its money at the time, no margin in cameras themselves, and I believe that associates were measured on this conversion.)

    The camera was objectively terrible, at least for my purposes. Laggy and a poor low-light performer. It remains a favorite anyhow.

    Taxi Stand, Grand Central Station…
    DSC00004.jpeg

    DSC00004.jpeg

    JPG, 371.8 KB, uploaded by jaberg on April 25, 2023.