Not sure if Jim has joined yet but the DMF forum wouldn’t be the same without him. Let’s encourage him to migrate over here. It seems the management here is working hard to make this work. Kudos to them!
Not sure if Jim has joined yet but the DMF forum wouldn’t be the same without him. Let’s encourage him to migrate over here. It seems the management here is working hard to make this work. Kudos to them!
Yes, that'll be nice. I'm going to ask him in the dpr thread :)
I've been relating the pros and cons to him. Time will tell.
For sure I've decided, at present, among the current 'sites to the rescue', this is my choice.
I'm here!
This is welcome news.
@JimKasson has written: @fcracer has written:Not sure if Jim has joined yet but the DMF forum wouldn’t be the same without him. Let’s encourage him to migrate over here. It seems the management here is working hard to make this work. Kudos to them!
I'm here!
This is welcome news.
The big difference is that the others have been produced by people who run web sites for a living. This one is a load of amateurs trying to work together. They have an advantage in terms of how slick it looks at the beginning, we have an advantage (I hope) in terms of commitment to the community. To get it as good as people want we need to deploy the skills of our membership, and we need the membership to be as large as possible. I chose a generalised web framework rather than a dedicated forum SW because it gives more potential for growth to a full fledged site with content apart from just forums.
Which is a long and roundabout way of saying, yes please do spread the word and rebuild your own community here.
There's an interesting thing that happened here. Alan introduced a 'Fujifilm MF' category, now there is feedback from people saying they'd rather have a single MF category, which kind of indicates how strong that forum bond was.
Hello all, test message and a very good evening from Singapore ☺️
This site is pretty well done and I really like the clean look and simplicity - both UI & UX on my iPhone mini tiny screen
Next multiple image test from iPhone via [Upload File]
Oh wow, its much better than DPReview image upload function ! 😱
@fcracer has written:Not sure if Jim has joined yet but the DMF forum wouldn’t be the same without him. Let’s encourage him to migrate over here. It seems the management here is working hard to make this work. Kudos to them!
I'm here!
Welcome Jim! I feel safe now. The future is bright again.
@fcracer has written:Not sure if Jim has joined yet but the DMF forum wouldn’t be the same without him. Let’s encourage him to migrate over here. It seems the management here is working hard to make this work. Kudos to them!
I'm here!
Excellent!! The new MF forum here will be educational and useful, even if one does not even own a MF camera. Glad to see some of the regulars from the old forum already here.
@reddott has written: @JimKasson has written: @fcracer has written:Not sure if Jim has joined yet but the DMF forum wouldn’t be the same without him. Let’s encourage him to migrate over here. It seems the management here is working hard to make this work. Kudos to them!
I'm here!
This is welcome news.
The big difference is that the others have been produced by people who run web sites for a living. This one is a load of amateurs trying to work together. They have an advantage in terms of how slick it looks at the beginning, we have an advantage (I hope) in terms of commitment to the community. To get it as good as people want we need to deploy the skills of our membership, and we need the membership to be as large as possible. I chose a generalised web framework rather than a dedicated forum SW because it gives more potential for growth to a full fledged site with content apart from just forums.
Which is a long and roundabout way of saying, yes please do spread the word and rebuild your own community here.
There's an interesting thing that happened here. Alan introduced a 'Fujifilm MF' category, now there is feedback from people saying they'd rather have a single MF category, which kind of indicates how strong that forum bond was.
does this mean that eventually the fujifilm mf and medium format talk will be merged?
@bobn2 has written: @reddott has written: @JimKasson has written: @fcracer has written:Not sure if Jim has joined yet but the DMF forum wouldn’t be the same without him. Let’s encourage him to migrate over here. It seems the management here is working hard to make this work. Kudos to them!
I'm here!
This is welcome news.
The big difference is that the others have been produced by people who run web sites for a living. This one is a load of amateurs trying to work together. They have an advantage in terms of how slick it looks at the beginning, we have an advantage (I hope) in terms of commitment to the community. To get it as good as people want we need to deploy the skills of our membership, and we need the membership to be as large as possible. I chose a generalised web framework rather than a dedicated forum SW because it gives more potential for growth to a full fledged site with content apart from just forums.
Which is a long and roundabout way of saying, yes please do spread the word and rebuild your own community here.
There's an interesting thing that happened here. Alan introduced a 'Fujifilm MF' category, now there is feedback from people saying they'd rather have a single MF category, which kind of indicates how strong that forum bond was.does this mean that eventually the fujifilm mf and medium format talk will be merged?
The policy is to do what members want. The difficulty is finding out what members want.
@bobn2 has written:There's an interesting thing that happened here. Alan introduced a 'Fujifilm MF' category, now there is feedback from people saying they'd rather have a single MF category, which kind of indicates how strong that forum bond was.
does this mean that eventually the fujifilm mf and medium format talk will be merged?
I hope they are eventually merged.
@MarkSloe has written: @bobn2 has written:There's an interesting thing that happened here. Alan introduced a 'Fujifilm MF' category, now there is feedback from people saying they'd rather have a single MF category, which kind of indicates how strong that forum bond was.
does this mean that eventually the fujifilm mf and medium format talk will be merged?
I hope they are eventually merged.
That is my desire as well.
Bob
The policy is to do what members want. The difficulty is finding out what members want.
I use a Fujifilm GFX and I’ll only be contributing to the MF talk forum.
@bobn2 has written: @reddott has written: @JimKasson has written: @fcracer has written:Not sure if Jim has joined yet but the DMF forum wouldn’t be the same without him. Let’s encourage him to migrate over here. It seems the management here is working hard to make this work. Kudos to them!
I'm here!
This is welcome news.
The big difference is that the others have been produced by people who run web sites for a living. This one is a load of amateurs trying to work together. They have an advantage in terms of how slick it looks at the beginning, we have an advantage (I hope) in terms of commitment to the community. To get it as good as people want we need to deploy the skills of our membership, and we need the membership to be as large as possible. I chose a generalised web framework rather than a dedicated forum SW because it gives more potential for growth to a full fledged site with content apart from just forums.
Which is a long and roundabout way of saying, yes please do spread the word and rebuild your own community here.
There's an interesting thing that happened here. Alan introduced a 'Fujifilm MF' category, now there is feedback from people saying they'd rather have a single MF category, which kind of indicates how strong that forum bond was.does this mean that eventually the fujifilm mf and medium format talk will be merged?
Hi,
Add me to the list of those wishing for a merger. ;)
I will only be here as well, even if I eventually get a GFX.
Stan
@fcracer has written:Not sure if Jim has joined yet but the DMF forum wouldn’t be the same without him. Let’s encourage him to migrate over here. It seems the management here is working hard to make this work. Kudos to them!
I'm here!
Good news :)