• Bryanlens
    1375 posts
    a year ago

    I probably prefer my previous set but they were about yesterday so had to take the opportunity...

    Common Darter - female
    P1090361a.JPG

    P1090398a.JPG

    Common Darter - elusive male
    P1090373a.JPG

    Graphic Flutterer catching some sun
    P1090453a.JPG

    Just to show I am trying to capture in flight - not easy at full zoom - a work in progress...
    P1090465a.JPG

    P1090465a.JPG

    JPG, 1.6 MB, uploaded by Bryan a year ago.

    P1090453a.JPG

    JPG, 1.2 MB, uploaded by Bryan a year ago.

    P1090373a.JPG

    JPG, 827.9 KB, uploaded by Bryan a year ago.

    P1090398a.JPG

    JPG, 1.3 MB, uploaded by Bryan a year ago.

    P1090361a.JPG

    JPG, 1.4 MB, uploaded by Bryan a year ago.

  • AlanShpanorama_fish_eye
    a year ago

    That one in flight - I have no idea how you did that. I tried and they flitted around way too much for me to get any sort of focus.

  • Bryanlens
    1375 posts
    a year ago

    I had had zero success also until I was reading someone's post about bif. Reading the signs a bird will give when it is about to take off and having pre-burst enabled and also tracking it from there..

    I don't have pre-burst, but in this case the dragonfly was taking off, flying around, and coming back to the same perch (that's why the crop includes the grass). So I kept the camera pointed in that general direction and took a few shots when I saw (naked eye) it coming back. Many, many failures and that was the best of a bad lot. I had another even more out of focus of it taking off - they don't give any signs - one second there, next gone. For this I had the 49 area auto focus but I find it doesn't nail focus like I can with pinpoint. But I may need to learn a bit more there.
    The other thing with these particular dragonflies, is they are more like a butterfly in flight. Their wing beat speed is quite low and they don't dart around quite as quickly as other dragonflies.

  • Stigpanorama_fish_eye
    599 posts
    a year ago

    Try to get one head on like this...I dare you!

    d-fly.jpg

    d-fly.jpg

    JPG, 872.9 KB, uploaded by Stig a year ago.

  • Bryanlens
    1375 posts
    a year ago

    Impressive.

    I have some that are just a soft blur. Do they count? 😏

  • Stigpanorama_fish_eye
    599 posts
    a year ago

    Depends. There is only a very small area of focus one can get with these guys when in flight and a moving target. The rest is usually blurred due to DOF issues/angles. Eyes and face in focus are usually best...
    here is another side profile shot_

    Dragonfly in Flight.jpg

    Dragonfly in Flight.jpg

    JPG, 1023.0 KB, uploaded by Stig a year ago.

  • 748 posts
    a year ago

    Not exactly head on. It gave in at the last moment

    dragonfly.jpg

    dragonfly.jpg

    JPG, 2.0 MB, uploaded by Sagittarius a year ago.

  • 748 posts
    a year ago

    Another one

    dragonfly 2.jpg

    dragonfly 2.jpg

    JPG, 992.9 KB, uploaded by Sagittarius a year ago.

  • Bryanlens
    1375 posts
    a year ago

    I have always been trying but need the planets to align. My camera mostly focuses on background objects if present. So I need to get a clear background. Also the few times I have had the camera actually focus on one, it isn't too sharp. I keep meaning to switch to ES for faster ss but need good light bcos too much noise if I raise iso.
    Anyway I am happy to get them close on a perch and get as much detail as I can.

    Another from today

    P1090618b.JPG

    P1090618b.JPG

    JPG, 2.1 MB, uploaded by Bryan a year ago.

  • Stigpanorama_fish_eye
    599 posts
    a year ago

    I wouldn't depend on AF very much. I use manual focus the majority of the time. It's not easy street, but it works best with busy backgrounds.

  • Stigpanorama_fish_eye
    599 posts
    a year ago

    There is a lot of over-sharpening artifacts in those two d-fly shots. What software are you using? Topaz?

  • 748 posts
    a year ago

    @Stig
    Yes, Topaz. I intentionally over sharpened them. I like the way they look.

  • Stigpanorama_fish_eye
    599 posts
    a year ago

    In what way do you like that over sharpened look...
    I did it to this one and I think it looks rubbish - Dragonfly - Copy-SharpenAI-Focus-SharpenAI-Focus.jpg

    Dragonfly.jpg
    before and after.

    Dragonfly.jpg

    JPG, 758.8 KB, uploaded by Stig a year ago.

  • 748 posts
    a year ago

    @Stig
    I do not know. Just like.

  • Bryanlens
    1375 posts
    a year ago

    P1090890a.JPG

    Almost. I don't care if it's side on a bit. I took your advice with manual focus. I knew it was coming back to that stick so was focused there.

    I do have pre-burst. I had it set to medium (6fps) and tried it the other day with them taking off. Got mostly only one shot in frame but low quality. Will try again another time with SH (60fps) and good light / higher SS.

    P1090890a.JPG

    JPG, 3.5 MB, uploaded by Bryan a year ago.

  • Bryanlens
    1375 posts
    a year ago

    P1090721-1.jpg

    P1090721-2.jpg

    P1090721-3.jpg

    Actually, one set from the other day was a start... Just extracts from the MP4

    P1090721-3.jpg

    JPG, 2.1 MB, uploaded by Bryan a year ago.

    P1090721-2.jpg

    JPG, 2.0 MB, uploaded by Bryan a year ago.

    P1090721-1.jpg

    JPG, 1.9 MB, uploaded by Bryan a year ago.

  • Stigpanorama_fish_eye
    599 posts
    a year ago
  • Bryanlens
    1375 posts
    a year ago
  • Bryanlens
    1375 posts
    a year ago

    P1100877a.JPG

    Australian Emerald - a little oof and noisy...

    P1100481a.JPG

    P1100733a.JPG

    A couple of damselflies. These are very small, up to 25mm.

    P1100733a.JPG

    JPG, 1.6 MB, uploaded by Bryan a year ago.

    P1100481a.JPG

    JPG, 1.7 MB, uploaded by Bryan a year ago.

    P1100877a.JPG

    JPG, 2.2 MB, uploaded by Bryan a year ago.

  • Stigpanorama_fish_eye
    599 posts
    a year ago

    Nice!

  • Bryanlens
    1375 posts
    a year ago

    P1110592a.JPG

    P1110603a.JPG

    I will never get the detail with this camera but it is rewarding none the less...

    P1110603a.JPG

    JPG, 1.0 MB, uploaded by Bryan a year ago.

    P1110592a.JPG

    JPG, 1.0 MB, uploaded by Bryan a year ago.

  • Bryanlens
    1375 posts
    a year ago

    P1110907b.JPG

    P1120020a.JPG

    P1120379a.JPG

    P1120379a.JPG

    JPG, 696.4 KB, uploaded by Bryan a year ago.

    P1120020a.JPG

    JPG, 1.1 MB, uploaded by Bryan a year ago.

    P1110907b.JPG

    JPG, 670.3 KB, uploaded by Bryan a year ago.

  • Bryanlens
    1375 posts
    a year ago

    P1130810a.JPG

    P1130810a.JPG

    JPG, 1.7 MB, uploaded by Bryan a year ago.

  • Bryanlens
    1375 posts
    a year ago

    P1170710b.JPG

    P1170820a.JPG

    Using MF on the FZ300 helps get more captures, but because the peaking isn't real precise (it may show but can't tell how critical focus is) and given that the MF focus by wire on this camera isn't very precise either, I always had a low % of keepers - and frankly none with critical focus. So I decided to give AF a try again. I guess all the framing practice with MF has helped, as I was able to get a lot more good keepers in just two days. Lots less captures but far better results.

    P1170820a.JPG

    JPG, 1.9 MB, uploaded by Bryan a year ago.

    P1170710b.JPG

    JPG, 1.4 MB, uploaded by Bryan a year ago.