www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720326847386/
Kodak DCS Pro 14n (2003) / Fuji FinePix S3 Pro (2004) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
*Fun fact: They both use the same Nikon N80/F80 body
Kodak DCS Pro 14n (2003) / Fuji FinePix S3 Pro (2004) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
In the early 2000s, Nikon fans were in luck!
They had the choice between Nikon, Kodak, and Fujifilm to be able to use their Nikkor lenses.
Wow... it's indeed a very good and interesting shot. I'm sorry it got stolen a lot or at least used (I assume) without giving credit.
That's a nice looking camera - that Nikkor lens looks great on it as well (and I'm really not a fan of how Nikon lenses look).
Wow... it's indeed a very good and interesting shot. I'm sorry it got stolen a lot or at least used (I assume) without giving credit.
I find it quite amusing, and it's a good reflection of society.
The moment you post anything on social media, you lose control of it forever. ∞
Panasonic's first DSLR 4/3 vs. Sony's first ML FF
Lumix DMC-L1 4/3 (2006) / Sony Alpha 7 (2013)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720327400371/
Lumix DMC-L1 (2006) / Sony Alpha 7 (2013) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Panasonic Lumix DMC-L1 7.5 MP (3136 x 2352)
Panasonic's first 4/3
Price: $1,900.00 US
Photos taken with the Leica 14-50mm f/2.8-3.5
(with a 2.0x magnification)
ISO 100-1600
Sony Alpha 7 (2013)
24 MP FF sensor (6000 x 4000)
First ML FF
Price: $1,700.00 US
Photos taken with the Sony FE 85mm F1.8
(1.0x magnification)
ISO 100-6400 (50-25600)
N°01 Lumix DMC-L1 (2006) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
N°01 Sony a7 (2013) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
I would like to hear your comments … www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720327400371/
Excellent comparison. You always do an excellent job with these tests. Appreciate all the time and work you put into this.
I've never handled an ILC Lumix. I'm partial to the "rangefinder" layout. It helps keep the nose off the screen. This model looks very similar to the Olympus E-300 I owned. The colors look better than the yellowish Sony example.
Thanks for sharing,
barondla
Not sure I could reliably pick the FF from 4/3 without pixel peeping.
Thank you very much, in the end what matters is not the quantity but the quality of the interventions. 😎
Olympus E-300 (2004) / Panasonic Lumix DMC-L1 (2006)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157689610473420/
Olympus E-300 (2004) / Panasonic Lumix DMC-L1 (2006) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Have a nice weekend!
I agree, it works really well to show differences in the look and particularly the colors and nuances - well done!
Vielen Dank, Sir
Here are two cameras that exude elegance and class.
Two devices that are pleasant to use, but which also have one major flaw in my opinion: the lack of a viewfinder, which is so unpleasant in good weather!
Olympus E-P1 (2009) / Lumix GF3 (2011)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720328983822
Olympus E-P1 (2009)
12.3 MP sensor (4032 x 3024)
Olympus's first µ4/3 lens
Price: $850.00 US
Photos taken with a Panasonic Lumix G 20mm f/1.7 II
(at a 2.0x magnification) µ4/3
ISO 100-6400
Panasonic Lumix GF3 (2011)
12.1 MP sensor (4000 x 3000)
Price: $600.00 US
Photos taken with a Panasonic Lumix G 20mm f/1.7
(at a 2.0x magnification) µ4/3
ISO 160-6400
Your turn to judge: www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720328983822/
Your remarks are welcome!
Interesting. The Olympus looks like an art deco piece while the Lumix looks like a 1920's must have fashion piece - nice styling.
Always wanted an EP-1. Ended up with an EP-1L. Not as stylish but it has the extra hot shoe contacts for the Olympus tilting EVF eyepiece. Still use it once in a while.
Nice comparison. Didn't expect the Panasonic to be so much smaller. Would still like to get the almost Pentax Q size Panny some day.
Thanks for sharing,
barondla
T
Interesting descriptions, thank you very much for your feedback. 👍🏼
I have been looking for a DMW-LVF1 External Live Viewfinder for my LUMIX GF1
They sell for more than the camera on eBay!! 😱
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157668021321598/
Two cameras that did not go unnoticed in 2012
The two cameras were released only a few days apart.
Pentax is offering a new ML, which retains the K mount, but without a viewfinder!
Fujifilm, on the other hand, presents an ML with two viewfinders (EVF/OVF), the ultimate luxury.
I made a comparison between the two
Fujifilm X-Pro1 (2012) / Pentax K-01 (2012)
Personally, I like the look of the Pentax K-01 with its indestructible brick-like appearance.
But how unpleasant it is to take photographs on sunny days and have to compare them blindly...
The X-Pro1, on the other hand, offers everything; it's extraordinary to have the choice between EVF or OVF, for a 2012 camera.
But both cameras give very good results, it's up to you to judge.
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720329440860/
I would like to have your opinion on these two cameras, if possible.
I have not used either of these.
Commenting on design - Fujifilm looks like a serious classic camera, Pentax one - perhaps a part of some lego set?
For the Lego version, I would rather go for this one 😎
