š
April 24, 2023
268
-
-
Comparisons made with the Sony a7, the first full-frame mirrorless camera
Sony Alpha 100 (2006) / Sony Alpha 7 (2013)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720323290081Sony Alpha 7 (2013) / Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II (2016)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720315752104/Sony Alpha 7 (2013) / Fujifilm X-T5 (2022)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720317205548Nikon D600 (2012) / Sony a7 (2013)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720314984304/Canon EOS-1Ds (2002) / Sony Alpha 7 (2013)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720316553723/Lumix DMC-GX7 (2013) / Sony Alpha 7 (2013)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720320295667/Lumix DMC-L1 (2006) / Sony Alpha 7 (2013)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720327400371/Your feedback is welcome.
-
Looks like Flickr does not like my AdBlocker ...
-
That's kind of normal, isn't it?
-
Sony Alpha 100 (2006) / Sony Alpha 7 (2013)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720323290081Sony Alpha 7 (2013) / Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II (2016)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720315752104/Sony Alpha 7 (2013) / Fujifilm X-T5 (2022)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720317205548Nikon D600 (2012) / Sony a7 (2013)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720314984304/Canon EOS-1Ds (2002) / Sony Alpha 7 (2013)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720316553723/Lumix DMC-GX7 (2013) / Sony Alpha 7 (2013)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720320295667/Lumix DMC-L1 (2006) / Sony Alpha 7 (2013)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720327400371/Your feedback is welcome.
-
The 2013 Lumix vs 2013 Sony is interesting. Often the Sony white balance looks cooler than the the Pana. Once in a while they swap places. Both have very decent image quality and would be quite useable today. Does Pana make their own sensors? If so, they did a good job competing with Sony.
Got a kick out of the mini figurines. One even is even using a camera. Great fun.
Thanks,
barondla -
Thank you very much for your input and comments, which are rather rare on this forum š
The secrets surrounding the sensors have always been a mystery to me, rumors and what will people say. šµāš«
I have often used figurines for my focus and depth of field comparisons
Or simply to test a new camera, as in this case:EllePolaroid DSLR ā¦ ( Ichigo Morino )
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157631002780982EllePolaroid Compact
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157654846755576They have the advantage of not moving. š
-
Looks like she is using either a Polaroid SX 70 Sonar with electronic flash bar or the SLR 680. I remember selling the SX 70 at my first job. Yep, she isn't moving muchš.
I enjoy your posts and read them when time permits. Is there one digital camera you enjoy shooting with the most? Do you also collect film cameras?
Thanks,
barondla -
You're right, it's definitely one of the two models.
I have a few SX 70s in my Polaroid collection
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157643484243105/with/13653697255I still really enjoy taking pictures with my Nikon D500. šš¼
Yes, I collected film cameras from 1973 to 1996. But since 1996, I've focused exclusively on digital cameras.
-
I spent a great deal of time looking at all the cameras. Fun reliving a bunch of these and meeting many I was unaware of. Love the collage. Did you keep the film camera collection or dispose of it to start the digital collection?
Thanks for sharing,
barondla -
Thank you very much for your feedback, I would say that 99% of people on the internet who consult don't give any comments.
Since 1996 and my interest in digital photography, I have completely stopped my film photography collection.
And I must admit that with the passing of time, and my 30 additional years. My collection is starting to become a burden. šµāš«
For now, I have kept all 1042 of my cameras.My greetings š
-
Hi,
So, in digital terms, you had to add an 11th bit (after 1023). But you are still a long way from needing 12 bits (2048). ;)
Stan
Amateur Photographer
Professional Electronics Development Engineer -
I'd prefer to go back to 7 or 8 bits š¤
From ChatGPT ā¦
š Number of levels = 2āæ (where n = number of bits)
Therefore:
Bits Possible Values āā(2āæ)
1 bit 2
2 bits 4
3 bits 8
4 bits 16
5 bits 32
6 bits 64
7 bits 128
8 bits 256
9 bits 512
10 bits 1024
11 bits 2048
12 bits 4096 -
Hi,
Don't forget to subtract one from each value. Zero is a significant number here. So, you don't get 2 with a single bit. You get 0 and 1. To get to 2, you now need 2 bits. After which, you can get a shave and a haircut. :P
Stan
Amateur Photographer
Professional Electronics Development Engineer -
The meaning of ChatGPT's "values" may have been misinterpreted. Or maybe I have misinterpreted the above.
For example, a single bit is 0 or 1, i.e. two possible values, 2 bits have four possible values, et subs.
Pardon the pedantry ...
-
Hi,
Correct. But Zero is a value. So, 0 and 1 for one bit. To get a value of Two, you need two bits as in 10. And now you can also get to a value of Three as in 11.
So, you see a value of 256 for 8 bits in that chart, whereas you would max out 8 bits to get to 255. Or FF in Hexadecimal, Base Sixteen, which is what we usually use for this work rather than Base Ten. Hence why I said to subtract one from each number in the chart to reflect how it actually works. ;)
Stan
Amateur Photographer
Professional Electronics Development Engineer -
I'm not English speaking person, but :)
For me the statement above means "count of distinct values", which is certainly correct. If instead it means "maximum value", then yes, we have to subtract one.
