or press F5 key.

you are on the new server domainname will switch later
If you can not login please clear cookies
chevron_left
chevron_right
DPRevived & The Photo
  • Home
  • Forums
    • theatersAll Forums arrow_forward
      • chat_bubbleNews and Discussions arrow_forward
        • camera Bobs Articles
        • camera The Basics- for Beginners and others
        • camera Buying advice
        • camera Daily Outing
        • camera The History of Photography
        • camera Image discussions, critiques and challenges
        • camera Photography News & Rumours
        • camera Open Talk
        • camera Resources discussions
        • camera Technical Discussions
      • chat_bubblePhotographic Equipment arrow_forward
        • camera Accessories, lighting & studio
        • camera Adapted and 3rd party lenses
        • camera Canon
        • camera Compact/Bridge
        • camera Fujifilm
        • camera Leica
        • camera Micro Four Thirds Talk
        • camera Medium/Large Format cameras
        • camera Mobile Phones
        • camera Nikon
        • camera Olympus/OM Systems
        • camera Other Manufacturers
        • camera Panasonic
        • camera Pentax/Ricoh
        • camera Sigma
        • camera Sony
      • chat_bubblePhotographic Genres arrow_forward
        • camera Abstract, Minimalism & Creative
        • camera Photo Art
        • camera Documentary and Street
        • camera Events Photography
        • camera Fauna Photography
        • camera Flora Photography
        • camera Home Photography
        • camera Landscape Photography
        • camera Macro and Still Life Photography
        • camera Nature and Wildlife Photography
        • camera Portrait and People Photography
        • camera Landscape and Travel Photography
        • camera Sport and Action Photography
        • camera Transportation
        • camera Travel Photography
        • camera Architecture
        • camera Underwater Photography
        • camera Wide Angle Photography
      • chat_bubbleSite Discussions arrow_forward
        • camera Development
        • camera Requests, help and bugs found
        • camera Governance and organisation
        • camera How to do things on this site
        • camera Useful Browser Plugins
        • camera Forum updates
      • chat_bubblePhotographic Techniques arrow_forward
        • camera 3D and Stereo Photography
        • camera Astrophotography & low light
        • camera B&W and Monochrome Photography
        • camera DIY and Photo Experiments
        • camera Drone Photography Talk Forum
        • camera Film based techniques
        • camera General Techniques and ideas
        • camera Infra Red/UV Photography
        • camera Digital Darkroom - tools & methods
  • Threads
  • Users
  • Web Site
search
  • message
  • group
  • chevron_rightThreads
  • labelAll Forums
  • labelDiscussionNews and Discussions
  • labelHistoryThe History of Photography

My Little History of DSLR/ML

Maoby
2 years ago
chat_bubble_outline215
  • placeGo to first post
  • replyGo to last post
first_pagechevron_leftchevron_rightlast_page
  • placeGo to first post
  • replyGo to last post
    JimKassonlens
    Online1737 posts
    2 years ago2 years ago
    @Maoby has written:
    @JimKasson has written:

    I didn't find the D3S that big an improvement over the D3, but I still bought two of them. The D3 was that camera that prompted me to sell all my Canon gear.

    I never had the chance to have a Nikon D3 or a D700 in my hands.
    I would have liked to compare the iso between the two (D3 / D3s), one day perhaps.

    The D3S is better at high ISO, but it's not night and day.

    photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm#Nikon%20D3,Nikon%20D3S

    Maobylens
    Online1574 posts
    2 years ago2 years ago

    Nikon D3S (2009) / Canon EOS-1D Mark IV (2009)

    www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157720291435605

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51748626903_c0d218c4c0_b.jpg


    Nikon D3S (2009) / Canon EOS-1D Mark IV (2009)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51749003234_dfc781fbb4_b.jpg


    Nikon D3S (2009) 100% / Canon EOS-1D Mark IV (2009) 100%
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51747508832_d5d0b1d9da_b.jpg


    Nikon D3S (102400 ISO) 100% / Canon EOS-1D Mark IV (102400 ISO) 100%
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51747492912_bcd76c0588_b.jpg


    Nikon D3S (2009) / Canon EOS-1D Mark IV (2009)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Maobylens
    Online1574 posts
    2 years ago2 years ago

    Two family photos, from 1999 to 2009

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50020743821_d26bd383de_b.jpg


    The Nikon D Family
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Nikon D1 (1999-2000)
    Nikon D1H (2001)
    Nikon D1X (2001)
    Nikon D2H (2003)
    Nikon D2X (2005)
    Nikon D3S (2009)

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51758087922_1ed4bc4761_b.jpg


    Family Canon DSLR Pro
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Canon EOS-1D 4 MP (2001)
    Canon EOS-1Ds 11 MP (2002)
    Canon EOS-1D Mark II N 8 MP (2005)
    Canon EOS-1D Mark IV 16 MP (2009)

    JimKasson likes this.

    favorite1

    Maobylens
    Online1574 posts
    2 years ago2 years ago

    2010

    Everyone knows the first Mirrorless digital camera with a 24x36 sensor (FF)

    Less sure on the other hand for the first APS-C ML

    It's the Samsung NX10 (2010)

    live.staticflickr.com/1862/29832398547_5d10dc91c2_b.jpg


    Samsung NX10 (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    14.6 MP sensor (4592x3120)
    1st APS-C mirrorless
    $750.00 CAD

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50022616846_f9e14d935e_b.jpg


    Samsung NX10 (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/5339/17067258834_2262980f1a_b.jpg


    Samsung NX10 (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/8826/18096530568_345554e0a0_b.jpg


    Nervures
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/48080621777_93ce779005_b.jpg


    N°17 Samsung NX10 (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/8757/17980824826_840fa6e47e_b.jpg


    undergrowth
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Samsung has come and gone very quickly from the digital camera market.
    Surely to focus entirely on smartphones, a much more lucrative market!

    simplejoy likes this.

    favorite1

    Maobylens
    Online1574 posts
    2 years ago2 years ago

    1st mirrorless micro 4/3 Lumix G1 (2008)
    1st APS-C mirrorless Samsung NX 10 (2010)

    live.staticflickr.com/1719/25812431473_06bb2c4a6e_b.jpg


    Lumix G1 (2008) / Samsung NX 10 (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 12.1MP (4000x3000)
    1st micro 4/3 mirrorless
    Price: $750 CAD
    With the Panasonic Lumix G 20mm f/1.7

    Samsung NX10 14.6MP (4592x3120)
    1st APS-C mirrorless
    Price: $750 CAD
    With the Samsung 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6

    Lumix G1 (2008) / Samsung NX 10 (2010)

    www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157669081030602

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/48131961986_7cfb7a60aa_b.jpg


    Lumix G1 (2008) / Samsung NX 10 (2010) 100%
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    petrochemist likes this.

    favorite1

    Maobylens
    Online1574 posts
    2 years ago2 years ago

    Pentax 645D (2010)

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50541926451_c0314ca54e_b.jpg


    Pentax 645D (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Pentax 645D (2010)
    40 MP sensor (7264 x 5440)
    Price: $9,400USD
    (with a multiplication factor of 0.79)
    MF (44 x 33mm) CCD
    200-1000 (100-1600) ISO

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50544951472_8c106bd720_b.jpg


    Pentax 645D (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    In 2010, after several years of waiting, Pentax's digital medium format is finally available.
    The Pentax 645D is equipped with the magnificent 40 MP Kodak CCD sensor.
    The great strength of the 645D is to be very versatile and easy to handle, it can be used both outdoors and indoors.
    And what about the pleasure of looking in such a beautiful viewfinder!

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50836575317_55048bbbba_b.jpg


    Pentax 645D (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50906489077_72fa6fb928_b.jpg


    Pentax 645D
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51144476043_1dd95b63ac_b.jpg


    N°21 Pentax 645D (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51184393242_8b08b364c8_b.jpg


    mai 2021
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51591928208_b13df0a4c9_b.jpg


    N°18 Pentax 645D (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50973770396_7b1fc9a404_b.jpg


    macabre day
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50591807172_18c7762041_b.jpg


    Pentax 645D (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    petrochemist, DonCox and JimKasson like this.

    favorite3

    Maobylens
    Online1574 posts
    2 years ago2 years ago

    Pentax K-5 (2010)

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51070603713_546f9d1c8f_b.jpg


    Pentax K-5 (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Pentax K-5 (2010)
    16.28 MP APS-C CMOS sensor (4928 x 3264)
    Price: $1,600.00 USD
    (multiplication factor of 1.5)
    ISO 100-12800 (80-51200) ISO

    The same year Pentax released its very famous Pentax K-5, a Great little DSLR :)

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51003183575_9a2236ddb8_b.jpg


    Pentax K-5 (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51066183893_b2b7552445_b.jpg


    Pentax K-5 (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/1515/24651600210_31d1017c57_b.jpg


    On his X
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/4514/38187981841_2ed6b62a96_b.jpg


    N°11 Pentax K-01
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/52369795100_f39c7062b1_b.jpg


    N°02 Pentax K-01 (2012)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    petrochemist likes this.

    favorite1

    Maobylens
    Online1574 posts
    2 years ago2 years ago

    Pentax Q (2011)

    Decidedly, Pentax was in great shape in the years 2010-2012!!

    Here is the opposite of the MF Pentax 645D
    The mini, mini, Pentax Q (2011)
    1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) 12 MP (4000x3000) sensor
    Price: $800.00 USD
    With a multiplication factor of 5.53
    ISO 125-3200

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/49496945792_22b4ff30ec_b.jpg


    Pentax Q (2011)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/49496227608_7f1b3ef16f_b.jpg


    Pentax Q (2011)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/52529549659_b95367c50d_b.jpg


    Pentax Q (2011)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/8403/10225063543_bf4126512d_b.jpg


    False start
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/7393/10447501636_0c6990c5f8_b.jpg


    Disappear in indifference
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50537585972_7efca3b97e_b.jpg


    N°19 Pentax Q (2011)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    DonCox likes this.

    favorite1

    petrochemistpanorama_fish_eye
    Offline208 posts
    2 years ago2 years ago
    @Maoby has written:

    Pentax Q (2011)

    It took me 10 years to get one.
    With the K5 I brought a used mk2 well before getting the Q.
    The 645D is going to have to wait quite a bit longer, none of my lenses adapt easily to it, so the initial cost of ownership will be significantly higher. My 5x4 lenses could be adapted but I doubt that would prove practical in use.

    How many warehouse do you have for all your cameras Marc ?

    Maobylens
    Online1574 posts
    2 years ago2 years ago
    @petrochemist has written:
    @Maoby has written:

    Pentax Q (2011)

    It took me 10 years to get one.
    With the K5 I brought a used mk2 well before getting the Q.
    The 645D is going to have to wait quite a bit longer, none of my lenses adapt easily to it, so the initial cost of ownership will be significantly higher. My 5x4 lenses could be adapted but I doubt that would prove practical in use.

    How many warehouse do you have for all your cameras Marc ?

    Unlike others, FA 645 lenses are easily found at very affordable prices.

    But for now, I'm very happy with only two lenses
    Pentax-D FA 645 55mm f/2.8
    Pentax FA 645 120mm f/4 Macro

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50598884668_8950800da9_b.jpg


    Pentax 645D
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    *Actually, I'm running out of space. 🤣

    JimKassonlens
    Online1737 posts
    2 years ago2 years ago
    @Maoby has written:

    Pentax FA 645 120mm f/4 Macro

    A very nice lens.

    petrochemistpanorama_fish_eye
    Offline208 posts
    2 years ago2 years ago
    @Maoby has written:

    Unlike others, FA 645 lenses are easily found at very affordable prices.

    Careful your in danger of sparking off a fresh attack of GAS

    Maobylens
    Online1574 posts
    2 years ago2 years ago

    The Pentax 645D is the only digital MF I can afford. 😁
    The other MF are unaffordable 😩
    But I would also like to have one of the Hasselblad digital H System. ❤️
    It's important to keep dreaming 😇

    StanDisbrowpanorama_fish_eye
    Offline421 posts
    2 years ago2 years ago
    @petrochemist has written:
    @Maoby has written:

    Pentax Q (2011)

    It took me 10 years to get one.
    With the K5 I brought a used mk2 well before getting the Q.
    The 645D is going to have to wait quite a bit longer, none of my lenses adapt easily to it, so the initial cost of ownership will be significantly higher. My 5x4 lenses could be adapted but I doubt that would prove practical in use.

    How many warehouse do you have for all your cameras Marc ?

    Hi,

    The highest price I paid for any of my P645 lenses was $200. Most from Robert's Camera in Indianapolis back in 2000.

    I bought lenses with greater performance for less money than I would had paid for old Pre AI Nikon lenses.

    Dirt cheap, I'd say. Which is ironic since they are mostly made from sand. :P

    Stan

    petrochemist and JimKasson like this.

    favorite2

    Maobylens
    Online1574 posts
    2 years ago2 years ago

    Just for fun, I made a comparison between the two Pentax 😈

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50550848042_6b4cb6a780_b.jpg


    Pentax 645D (2010) / Pentax Q (2011)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Duel Pentax Extreme

    Between the Pentax 645D (2010) and the Pentax Q (2011)

    Pentax 645D (2010)
    MF sensor (44x33 mm) 40 MP CCD (7264 x 5440 )
    Price: $9,400.00 USD
    Photos were taken with the Pentax-D FA 645 55mm f/2.8
    (multiplication factor of 0.8) = 44mm
    200-1000 (100-1600) ISO

         _________________
    

    Pentax Q (2011)
    1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) 12 MP (4000x3000) sensor
    Price: $800.00 USD
    Photos were taken with the Pentax-01 Standard Prime 8.5mm f/1.9
    (5.53 multiplication factor) = 47mm
    ISO 125-3200

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50578966848_fc7ecc3623_b.jpg


    N°01 Pentax 645D (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50579831517_b6ca4a0948_b.jpg


    N°01 Pentax Q (2011)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    To see the whole thing, it's HERE

    petrochemist likes this.

    favorite1

    Maobylens
    Online1574 posts
    2 years ago2 years ago

    Prolific year for Panasonic, which allows the Lumix GF2 and GF3 to be released in the same year!

    It is the proliferation of µ4/3 It's a good time, the period just before the invasion of smartphones.

    Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 (2011)

    live.staticflickr.com/7336/14118396902_a67b82568a_b.jpg


    Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Panasonic Lumix GF2 (2011)
    12.1 MP sensor (4000 x 3000)
    Price: $700 USD
    (with a multiplication factor of 2.0) µ4/3
    ISO100-6400

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50022615826_b675390d6d_b.jpg


    Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 (2011)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/3743/9507880139_f0c177f31b_b.jpg


    the day after
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/3710/12587504343_596174ce19_b.jpg


    mess
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/2917/13942604500_147e415964_b.jpg


    make waves
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Maobylens
    Online1574 posts
    2 years ago2 years ago

    Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 (2011)

    live.staticflickr.com/5326/14118123371_e2eb95c444_b.jpg


    Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    The 12.1 MP Lumix GF3 (4000 x 3000)
    Price: $600 USD
    (with a multiplication factor of 2.0) µ4/3
    ISO160-6400

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50116111656_295a4934d5_b.jpg


    Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 (2011)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/7453/12419184633_74b1f43d00_b.jpg


    Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 (2011)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/3822/9161120403_f6c759c3ed_b.jpg


    I feel so small
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/3742/9654837114_4e152a0df7_b.jpg


    laughing out loud
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Maobylens
    Online1574 posts
    2 years ago2 years ago

    Small Lumix Family Photo (2009-2011)

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/49329214266_a22d725c26_b.jpg


    Lumix family photo
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 (2009)
    Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 (2011)
    Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 (2011)

first_pagechevron_leftchevron_rightlast_page

There are 72 more posts in this thread.

  • DPRevived.com is owned and operated by The Photographer's Foundation Limited, registered in England, company number 14795583. Email: management@DPRevived.com
powered by misago