The D3S is better at high ISO, but it's not night and day.
The D3S is better at high ISO, but it's not night and day.
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157720291435605
Nikon D3S (2009) / Canon EOS-1D Mark IV (2009) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Nikon D3S (2009) 100% / Canon EOS-1D Mark IV (2009) 100% by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Nikon D3S (102400 ISO) 100% / Canon EOS-1D Mark IV (102400 ISO) 100% by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Nikon D3S (2009) / Canon EOS-1D Mark IV (2009) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
The Nikon D Family by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Nikon D1 (1999-2000)
Nikon D1H (2001)
Nikon D1X (2001)
Nikon D2H (2003)
Nikon D2X (2005)
Nikon D3S (2009)
Family Canon DSLR Pro by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Canon EOS-1D 4 MP (2001)
Canon EOS-1Ds 11 MP (2002)
Canon EOS-1D Mark II N 8 MP (2005)
Canon EOS-1D Mark IV 16 MP (2009)
Everyone knows the first Mirrorless digital camera with a 24x36 sensor (FF)
Less sure on the other hand for the first APS-C ML
Samsung NX10 (2010) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
14.6 MP sensor (4592x3120)
1st APS-C mirrorless
$750.00 CAD
Samsung NX10 (2010) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Samsung NX10 (2010) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Nervures by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
N°17 Samsung NX10 (2010) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
undergrowth by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Samsung has come and gone very quickly from the digital camera market.
Surely to focus entirely on smartphones, a much more lucrative market!
1st mirrorless micro 4/3 Lumix G1 (2008)
1st APS-C mirrorless Samsung NX 10 (2010)
Lumix G1 (2008) / Samsung NX 10 (2010) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 12.1MP (4000x3000)
1st micro 4/3 mirrorless
Price: $750 CAD
With the Panasonic Lumix G 20mm f/1.7
Samsung NX10 14.6MP (4592x3120)
1st APS-C mirrorless
Price: $750 CAD
With the Samsung 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6
Lumix G1 (2008) / Samsung NX 10 (2010)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157669081030602
Lumix G1 (2008) / Samsung NX 10 (2010) 100% by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Pentax 645D (2010) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Pentax 645D (2010)
40 MP sensor (7264 x 5440)
Price: $9,400USD
(with a multiplication factor of 0.79)
MF (44 x 33mm) CCD
200-1000 (100-1600) ISO
Pentax 645D (2010) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
In 2010, after several years of waiting, Pentax's digital medium format is finally available.
The Pentax 645D is equipped with the magnificent 40 MP Kodak CCD sensor.
The great strength of the 645D is to be very versatile and easy to handle, it can be used both outdoors and indoors.
And what about the pleasure of looking in such a beautiful viewfinder!
Pentax 645D (2010) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Pentax 645D by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
N°21 Pentax 645D (2010) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
mai 2021 by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
N°18 Pentax 645D (2010) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
macabre day by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Pentax 645D (2010) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Pentax K-5 (2010) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Pentax K-5 (2010)
16.28 MP APS-C CMOS sensor (4928 x 3264)
Price: $1,600.00 USD
(multiplication factor of 1.5)
ISO 100-12800 (80-51200) ISO
The same year Pentax released its very famous Pentax K-5, a Great little DSLR :)
Pentax K-5 (2010) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Pentax K-5 (2010) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
On his X by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
N°11 Pentax K-01 by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
N°02 Pentax K-01 (2012) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Decidedly, Pentax was in great shape in the years 2010-2012!!
Here is the opposite of the MF Pentax 645D
The mini, mini, Pentax Q (2011)
1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) 12 MP (4000x3000) sensor
Price: $800.00 USD
With a multiplication factor of 5.53
ISO 125-3200
Pentax Q (2011) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Pentax Q (2011) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Pentax Q (2011) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
False start by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Disappear in indifference by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
N°19 Pentax Q (2011) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Pentax Q (2011)
It took me 10 years to get one.
With the K5 I brought a used mk2 well before getting the Q.
The 645D is going to have to wait quite a bit longer, none of my lenses adapt easily to it, so the initial cost of ownership will be significantly higher. My 5x4 lenses could be adapted but I doubt that would prove practical in use.
How many warehouse do you have for all your cameras Marc ?
@Maoby has written:Pentax Q (2011)
It took me 10 years to get one.
With the K5 I brought a used mk2 well before getting the Q.
The 645D is going to have to wait quite a bit longer, none of my lenses adapt easily to it, so the initial cost of ownership will be significantly higher. My 5x4 lenses could be adapted but I doubt that would prove practical in use.How many warehouse do you have for all your cameras Marc ?
Unlike others, FA 645 lenses are easily found at very affordable prices.
But for now, I'm very happy with only two lenses
Pentax-D FA 645 55mm f/2.8
Pentax FA 645 120mm f/4 Macro
Pentax 645D by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
*Actually, I'm running out of space. 🤣
Pentax FA 645 120mm f/4 Macro
A very nice lens.
Unlike others, FA 645 lenses are easily found at very affordable prices.
Careful your in danger of sparking off a fresh attack of GAS
The Pentax 645D is the only digital MF I can afford. 😁
The other MF are unaffordable 😩
But I would also like to have one of the Hasselblad digital H System. ❤️
It's important to keep dreaming 😇
@Maoby has written:Pentax Q (2011)
It took me 10 years to get one.
With the K5 I brought a used mk2 well before getting the Q.
The 645D is going to have to wait quite a bit longer, none of my lenses adapt easily to it, so the initial cost of ownership will be significantly higher. My 5x4 lenses could be adapted but I doubt that would prove practical in use.How many warehouse do you have for all your cameras Marc ?
Hi,
The highest price I paid for any of my P645 lenses was $200. Most from Robert's Camera in Indianapolis back in 2000.
I bought lenses with greater performance for less money than I would had paid for old Pre AI Nikon lenses.
Dirt cheap, I'd say. Which is ironic since they are mostly made from sand. :P
Stan
Just for fun, I made a comparison between the two Pentax 😈
Pentax 645D (2010) / Pentax Q (2011) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Duel Pentax Extreme
Between the Pentax 645D (2010) and the Pentax Q (2011)
Pentax 645D (2010)
MF sensor (44x33 mm) 40 MP CCD (7264 x 5440 )
Price: $9,400.00 USD
Photos were taken with the Pentax-D FA 645 55mm f/2.8
(multiplication factor of 0.8) = 44mm
200-1000 (100-1600) ISO
_________________
Pentax Q (2011)
1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) 12 MP (4000x3000) sensor
Price: $800.00 USD
Photos were taken with the Pentax-01 Standard Prime 8.5mm f/1.9
(5.53 multiplication factor) = 47mm
ISO 125-3200
N°01 Pentax 645D (2010) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
N°01 Pentax Q (2011) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Prolific year for Panasonic, which allows the Lumix GF2 and GF3 to be released in the same year!
It is the proliferation of µ4/3 It's a good time, the period just before the invasion of smartphones.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Panasonic Lumix GF2 (2011)
12.1 MP sensor (4000 x 3000)
Price: $700 USD
(with a multiplication factor of 2.0) µ4/3
ISO100-6400
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 (2011) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
the day after by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
mess by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
make waves by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
The 12.1 MP Lumix GF3 (4000 x 3000)
Price: $600 USD
(with a multiplication factor of 2.0) µ4/3
ISO160-6400
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 (2011) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 (2011) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
I feel so small by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
laughing out loud by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Small Lumix Family Photo (2009-2011)
Lumix family photo by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 (2009)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 (2011)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 (2011)