you are on the new server domainname will switch later
If you can not login please clear cookies
chevron_left
chevron_right
The-Photo forum
  • Home
  • Forums
    • theatersImage Discussions arrow_forward
      • chat_bubbleChallenges arrow_forward
        • camera Edit me an Image
        • camera Photo of the Week
      • chat_bubbleHave your photos Critiqued arrow_forward
        • camera Wednesday C&C
      • Showcase your Photos
      • chat_bubbleWeekly & Topic Image Threads arrow_forward
        • camera Abstract/Experimental
        • camera B&W Threads
        • camera Sunday Cats!
        • camera Weekly Collegial forum
        • camera Daily Outing
        • camera This week through your eyes
        • camera Landscape
        • camera Street Photography
    • theatersMiscellaneous forums arrow_forward
      • Photo Hardware Discussions
      • Industry News
    • theatersOther Photography Talk arrow_forward
      • General Articles
      • Photo History Trivia
      • Open discussions
      • Technical Discussions
    • theatersSite Discussions arrow_forward
      • Governance and organisation
      • Updates & Bugs
    • theatersWelcome arrow_forward
      • chat_bubbleForum Guidelines arrow_forward
        • camera Misplaced Posts
      • Introduce yourself
  • Threads
  • Users
  • Web Site
  • message
  • group
  • chevron_right Threads
  • label Other Other Photography Talk
  • label History Photo History Trivia

My Little History of DSLR/ML

Maoby
April 24, 2023
chat_bubble_outline 223
arrow_downward first_page chevron_left chevron_right last_page
  • link
    JimKasson
    Members 1738 posts
    May 11, 2023, 3:45 p.m. May 11, 2023, 3:45 p.m.
    link
    @Maoby has written:
    @JimKasson has written:

    I didn't find the D3S that big an improvement over the D3, but I still bought two of them. The D3 was that camera that prompted me to sell all my Canon gear.

    I never had the chance to have a Nikon D3 or a D700 in my hands.
    I would have liked to compare the iso between the two (D3 / D3s), one day perhaps.

    The D3S is better at high ISO, but it's not night and day.

    photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm#Nikon%20D3,Nikon%20D3S

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1602 posts
    May 11, 2023, 6:46 p.m. May 11, 2023, 6:46 p.m.
    link

    Nikon D3S (2009) / Canon EOS-1D Mark IV (2009)

    www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157720291435605

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51748626903_c0d218c4c0_b.jpg
    Nikon D3S (2009) / Canon EOS-1D Mark IV (2009)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51749003234_dfc781fbb4_b.jpg
    Nikon D3S (2009) 100% / Canon EOS-1D Mark IV (2009) 100%
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51747508832_d5d0b1d9da_b.jpg
    Nikon D3S (102400 ISO) 100% / Canon EOS-1D Mark IV (102400 ISO) 100%
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51747492912_bcd76c0588_b.jpg
    Nikon D3S (2009) / Canon EOS-1D Mark IV (2009)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1602 posts
    May 11, 2023, 10:28 p.m. May 11, 2023, 10:28 p.m.
    link

    Two family photos, from 1999 to 2009

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50020743821_d26bd383de_b.jpg
    The Nikon D Family
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Nikon D1 (1999-2000)
    Nikon D1H (2001)
    Nikon D1X (2001)
    Nikon D2H (2003)
    Nikon D2X (2005)
    Nikon D3S (2009)

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51758087922_1ed4bc4761_b.jpg
    Family Canon DSLR Pro
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Canon EOS-1D 4 MP (2001)
    Canon EOS-1Ds 11 MP (2002)
    Canon EOS-1D Mark II N 8 MP (2005)
    Canon EOS-1D Mark IV 16 MP (2009)

    JimKasson likes this.

    favorite 1

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1602 posts
    May 12, 2023, 11:10 a.m. May 12, 2023, 11:10 a.m.
    link

    2010

    Everyone knows the first Mirrorless digital camera with a 24x36 sensor (FF)

    Less sure on the other hand for the first APS-C ML

    It's the Samsung NX10 (2010)

    live.staticflickr.com/1862/29832398547_5d10dc91c2_b.jpg
    Samsung NX10 (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    14.6 MP sensor (4592x3120)
    1st APS-C mirrorless
    $750.00 CAD

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50022616846_f9e14d935e_b.jpg
    Samsung NX10 (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/5339/17067258834_2262980f1a_b.jpg
    Samsung NX10 (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/8826/18096530568_345554e0a0_b.jpg
    Nervures
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/48080621777_93ce779005_b.jpg
    N°17 Samsung NX10 (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/8757/17980824826_840fa6e47e_b.jpg
    undergrowth
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Samsung has come and gone very quickly from the digital camera market.
    Surely to focus entirely on smartphones, a much more lucrative market!

    simplejoy likes this.

    favorite 1

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1602 posts
    May 12, 2023, 3:44 p.m. May 12, 2023, 3:44 p.m.
    link

    1st mirrorless micro 4/3 Lumix G1 (2008)
    1st APS-C mirrorless Samsung NX 10 (2010)

    live.staticflickr.com/1719/25812431473_06bb2c4a6e_b.jpg
    Lumix G1 (2008) / Samsung NX 10 (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 12.1MP (4000x3000)
    1st micro 4/3 mirrorless
    Price: $750 CAD
    With the Panasonic Lumix G 20mm f/1.7

    Samsung NX10 14.6MP (4592x3120)
    1st APS-C mirrorless
    Price: $750 CAD
    With the Samsung 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6

    Lumix G1 (2008) / Samsung NX 10 (2010)

    www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157669081030602

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/48131961986_7cfb7a60aa_b.jpg
    Lumix G1 (2008) / Samsung NX 10 (2010) 100%
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    petrochemist likes this.

    favorite 1

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1602 posts
    May 12, 2023, 6:39 p.m. May 12, 2023, 6:39 p.m.
    link

    Pentax 645D (2010)

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50541926451_c0314ca54e_b.jpg
    Pentax 645D (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Pentax 645D (2010)
    40 MP sensor (7264 x 5440)
    Price: $9,400USD
    (with a multiplication factor of 0.79)
    MF (44 x 33mm) CCD
    200-1000 (100-1600) ISO

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50544951472_8c106bd720_b.jpg
    Pentax 645D (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    In 2010, after several years of waiting, Pentax's digital medium format is finally available.
    The Pentax 645D is equipped with the magnificent 40 MP Kodak CCD sensor.
    The great strength of the 645D is to be very versatile and easy to handle, it can be used both outdoors and indoors.
    And what about the pleasure of looking in such a beautiful viewfinder!

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50836575317_55048bbbba_b.jpg
    Pentax 645D (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50906489077_72fa6fb928_b.jpg
    Pentax 645D
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51144476043_1dd95b63ac_b.jpg
    N°21 Pentax 645D (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51184393242_8b08b364c8_b.jpg
    mai 2021
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51591928208_b13df0a4c9_b.jpg
    N°18 Pentax 645D (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50973770396_7b1fc9a404_b.jpg
    macabre day
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50591807172_18c7762041_b.jpg
    Pentax 645D (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    petrochemist, DonCox and JimKasson like this.

    favorite 3

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1602 posts
    May 13, 2023, 10:55 a.m. May 13, 2023, 10:55 a.m.
    link

    Pentax K-5 (2010)

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51070603713_546f9d1c8f_b.jpg
    Pentax K-5 (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Pentax K-5 (2010)
    16.28 MP APS-C CMOS sensor (4928 x 3264)
    Price: $1,600.00 USD
    (multiplication factor of 1.5)
    ISO 100-12800 (80-51200) ISO

    The same year Pentax released its very famous Pentax K-5, a Great little DSLR :)

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51003183575_9a2236ddb8_b.jpg
    Pentax K-5 (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51066183893_b2b7552445_b.jpg
    Pentax K-5 (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/1515/24651600210_31d1017c57_b.jpg
    On his X
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/4514/38187981841_2ed6b62a96_b.jpg
    N°11 Pentax K-01
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/52369795100_f39c7062b1_b.jpg
    N°02 Pentax K-01 (2012)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    petrochemist likes this.

    favorite 1

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1602 posts
    May 13, 2023, 1:18 p.m. May 13, 2023, 1:18 p.m.
    link

    Pentax Q (2011)

    Decidedly, Pentax was in great shape in the years 2010-2012!!

    Here is the opposite of the MF Pentax 645D
    The mini, mini, Pentax Q (2011)
    1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) 12 MP (4000x3000) sensor
    Price: $800.00 USD
    With a multiplication factor of 5.53
    ISO 125-3200

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/49496945792_22b4ff30ec_b.jpg
    Pentax Q (2011)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/49496227608_7f1b3ef16f_b.jpg
    Pentax Q (2011)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/52529549659_b95367c50d_b.jpg
    Pentax Q (2011)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/8403/10225063543_bf4126512d_b.jpg
    False start
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/7393/10447501636_0c6990c5f8_b.jpg
    Disappear in indifference
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50537585972_7efca3b97e_b.jpg
    N°19 Pentax Q (2011)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    DonCox likes this.

    favorite 1

  • link
    petrochemist
    Members 208 posts
    May 13, 2023, 3:48 p.m. May 13, 2023, 3:48 p.m.
    link
    @Maoby has written:

    Pentax Q (2011)

    It took me 10 years to get one.
    With the K5 I brought a used mk2 well before getting the Q.
    The 645D is going to have to wait quite a bit longer, none of my lenses adapt easily to it, so the initial cost of ownership will be significantly higher. My 5x4 lenses could be adapted but I doubt that would prove practical in use.

    How many warehouse do you have for all your cameras Marc ?

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1602 posts
    May 13, 2023, 4:04 p.m. May 13, 2023, 4:04 p.m.
    link
    @petrochemist has written:
    @Maoby has written:

    Pentax Q (2011)

    It took me 10 years to get one.
    With the K5 I brought a used mk2 well before getting the Q.
    The 645D is going to have to wait quite a bit longer, none of my lenses adapt easily to it, so the initial cost of ownership will be significantly higher. My 5x4 lenses could be adapted but I doubt that would prove practical in use.

    How many warehouse do you have for all your cameras Marc ?

    Unlike others, FA 645 lenses are easily found at very affordable prices.

    But for now, I'm very happy with only two lenses
    Pentax-D FA 645 55mm f/2.8
    Pentax FA 645 120mm f/4 Macro

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50598884668_8950800da9_b.jpg
    Pentax 645D
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    *Actually, I'm running out of space. 🤣

  • link
    JimKasson
    Members 1738 posts
    May 13, 2023, 4:06 p.m. May 13, 2023, 4:06 p.m.
    link
    @Maoby has written:

    Pentax FA 645 120mm f/4 Macro

    A very nice lens.

  • link
    petrochemist
    Members 208 posts
    May 13, 2023, 4:15 p.m. May 13, 2023, 4:15 p.m.
    link
    @Maoby has written:

    Unlike others, FA 645 lenses are easily found at very affordable prices.

    Careful your in danger of sparking off a fresh attack of GAS

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1602 posts
    May 13, 2023, 4:40 p.m. May 13, 2023, 4:40 p.m.
    link

    The Pentax 645D is the only digital MF I can afford. 😁
    The other MF are unaffordable 😩
    But I would also like to have one of the Hasselblad digital H System. ❤️
    It's important to keep dreaming 😇

  • link
    StanDisbrow
    Members 502 posts
    May 13, 2023, 6:44 p.m. May 13, 2023, 6:44 p.m.
    link
    @petrochemist has written:
    @Maoby has written:

    Pentax Q (2011)

    It took me 10 years to get one.
    With the K5 I brought a used mk2 well before getting the Q.
    The 645D is going to have to wait quite a bit longer, none of my lenses adapt easily to it, so the initial cost of ownership will be significantly higher. My 5x4 lenses could be adapted but I doubt that would prove practical in use.

    How many warehouse do you have for all your cameras Marc ?

    Hi,

    The highest price I paid for any of my P645 lenses was $200. Most from Robert's Camera in Indianapolis back in 2000.

    I bought lenses with greater performance for less money than I would had paid for old Pre AI Nikon lenses.

    Dirt cheap, I'd say. Which is ironic since they are mostly made from sand. :P

    Stan

    petrochemist and JimKasson like this.

    favorite 2

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1602 posts
    May 13, 2023, 9:45 p.m. May 13, 2023, 9:45 p.m.
    link

    Just for fun, I made a comparison between the two Pentax 😈

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50550848042_6b4cb6a780_b.jpg
    Pentax 645D (2010) / Pentax Q (2011)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Duel Pentax Extreme

    Between the Pentax 645D (2010) and the Pentax Q (2011)

    Pentax 645D (2010)
    MF sensor (44x33 mm) 40 MP CCD (7264 x 5440 )
    Price: $9,400.00 USD
    Photos were taken with the Pentax-D FA 645 55mm f/2.8
    (multiplication factor of 0.8) = 44mm
    200-1000 (100-1600) ISO

         _________________
    

    Pentax Q (2011)
    1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) 12 MP (4000x3000) sensor
    Price: $800.00 USD
    Photos were taken with the Pentax-01 Standard Prime 8.5mm f/1.9
    (5.53 multiplication factor) = 47mm
    ISO 125-3200

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50578966848_fc7ecc3623_b.jpg
    N°01 Pentax 645D (2010)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50579831517_b6ca4a0948_b.jpg
    N°01 Pentax Q (2011)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    To see the whole thing, it's HERE

    petrochemist likes this.

    favorite 1

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1602 posts
    May 14, 2023, 12:57 p.m. May 14, 2023, 12:57 p.m.
    link

    Prolific year for Panasonic, which allows the Lumix GF2 and GF3 to be released in the same year!

    It is the proliferation of µ4/3 It's a good time, the period just before the invasion of smartphones.

    Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 (2011)

    live.staticflickr.com/7336/14118396902_a67b82568a_b.jpg
    Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Panasonic Lumix GF2 (2011)
    12.1 MP sensor (4000 x 3000)
    Price: $700 USD
    (with a multiplication factor of 2.0) µ4/3
    ISO100-6400

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50022615826_b675390d6d_b.jpg
    Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 (2011)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/3743/9507880139_f0c177f31b_b.jpg
    the day after
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/3710/12587504343_596174ce19_b.jpg
    mess
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/2917/13942604500_147e415964_b.jpg
    make waves
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1602 posts
    May 14, 2023, 8:08 p.m. May 14, 2023, 8:08 p.m.
    link

    Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 (2011)

    live.staticflickr.com/5326/14118123371_e2eb95c444_b.jpg
    Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    The 12.1 MP Lumix GF3 (4000 x 3000)
    Price: $600 USD
    (with a multiplication factor of 2.0) µ4/3
    ISO160-6400

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/50116111656_295a4934d5_b.jpg
    Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 (2011)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/7453/12419184633_74b1f43d00_b.jpg
    Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 (2011)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/3822/9161120403_f6c759c3ed_b.jpg
    I feel so small
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/3742/9654837114_4e152a0df7_b.jpg
    laughing out loud
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1602 posts
    May 15, 2023, 4:13 a.m. May 15, 2023, 4:13 a.m.
    link

    Small Lumix Family Photo (2009-2011)

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/49329214266_a22d725c26_b.jpg
    Lumix family photo
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 (2009)
    Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 (2011)
    Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 (2011)

arrow_upward first_page chevron_left chevron_right last_page

There are 80 more posts in this thread.

  • DPRevived.com & the-photo.org are owned and operated by The Photographer's Foundation Limited, registered in England, company number 14795583. Contact us here https://the-photo.org/contact.html
powered by misago