I have to say that the Kodak DCS 460 has always impressed me.
April 24, 2023
207
-
-
Lumix DMC-GX7 (2013) / Sony Alpha 7 (2013)
My ML µ4/3 and ML FF cameras
Here's a comparison between my lovely GX7 and the very first FF ML
Very representative of the 2013 technology
Lumix DMC-GX7 (2013) / Sony Alpha 7 (2013) by Marc Aubry, sur FlickrWith six different lenses
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720320295667/Panasonic Lumix GX7 (2013)
16.1 MP µ4/3 sensor ( 4592 x 3448 )
Price : $1,000.00 US
Photo taken with the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm f/1.8 MSC AF
the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm f1.8
and the Lumix G 20mm f/1.7 II
(multiplication factor 2.0)
ISO 125-25600________________________Sony Alpha 7 (2013)
24 MP FF sensor (6000 x 4000)
First ML FF
Price: $1,700.00 US
Photos taken with the Sony FE 85mm F1.8
the nikkor AF 180mm f/2.8 D ED
and the nikkor AF 50mm f/1.8 D
(multiplication factor 1.0)
100-6400 (50-25600) ISO
Lumix DMC-GX7 (2013) 50% / Sony Alpha 7 (2013) 40% Prorata by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Lumix DMC-GX7 (400 ISO) 50% / Sony Alpha 7 (400 ISO) 50% by Marc Aubry, sur FlickrYour turn to judge
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720320295667/
Your remarks are welcome ! -
I love the colours from the Lumix - less so the Sony.
Alan
-
iPhone 4 (2010) / Pentax 645D (2010)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720321157234/
iPhone 4 (2010) / Pentax 645D (2010) by Marc Aubry, sur FlickriPhone 4 (2010)
5 MP sensor (2592x1936)
1/3.2" 4.54mm x 3.42mm
3.85mm f/2.8 camera
(with 7.6x multiplication factor) = 29.26mm
80 ISO
my first personal iPhone________________Pentax 645D (2010)
40 MP MF sensor (7264 x 5440 )
The first Pentax MF Digital
Price: $9,400.00 US
Photos taken with the Pentax-D FA 645 55mm f/2.8
(multiplication factor of 0.8 )
200-1000 (100-1600) ISOBetween the iPhone 4 (2010) and the Pentax 645D (2010)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720321157234/
Your remarks are welcome ! -
Interesting comparison. Initially, the flower pictures look OK on the iPhone, until you look at the out of focus areas. The bokeh is horrible.
Alan
-
Thanks!
I don't think the term "bokeh" is appropriate for a 2010 iPhone.
In 2010 we are at the very beginning of photography with smartphones.
Companies do not yet see the threat to the compact camera market, we know the rest.
Things have changed a lot in the last 15 years and the next 15 will probably be very interesting. -
The year 2017
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720321564819/
Sigma sd Quattro H (2017) / iPhone X (2017) by Marc Aubry, sur FlickrSigma sd Quattro H (2016-17)
25.56 MP APS-H sensor (6192 x 4128)
Price: $1,200.00 USD
Photos taken with the Sigma 24-105mm F4 DG OS HSM Art
(with a multiplication factor of 1.35)
ISO 100-6400
______iPhone X (2017)
12MP sensor (4032x3024)
Main camera: 12MP, ƒ/1.8 28mm (wide)
1/3.0" 1.22µm sensor
Telephoto camera: 12MP, ƒ/2.4 52mm (telephoto)
Sensor 1/3.4" 1.0µm
1x 2x optical zoom
(with 7x multiplication factor)
Selfie camera 7 MP f/2.2, 32mm (standard)For those interested, see the comparison
right here: www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720321564819/
I would like to have your comments if possible, thank you! -
Looking at some of the images, the iPhone seems over saturated and muddy compared to the sigma. Maybe it's just my eyes.
And, of course, the Sigma does DoF much better.
Alan
-
No, it is not your eyes - Sigma with its Foveon/X3 sensor and without AA filter is very sharp beast, even for Quattro series (where some intrerpolation is required). Saturation can be tuned (people like saturated colors => Apple tunes saturation up), native detail/sharpness not so easily.
-
Fortunately, Sigma's results are superior. Did you realize the difference in lens sizes here?
I find it much harder to slip the Sigma into my trouser pocket.
