• Maobylens
    1595 posts
    2 years ago

    The Nikon Coolpix 100 (1996)

    Nikon’s first consumer digital camera
    245,000-pixel sensor (512x480)
    With an internal 1MB PCMCIA card
    6.2mm f/4 lens
    Price: between $500 and $700 USD

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51146839814_7b52289c2c_k.jpg


    Nikon Coolpix 100 (1996)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    My Little History of Digital Compacts

  • Maobylens
    1595 posts
    2 years ago

    Nikon Coolpix 300 (1997)

    Nikon's second consumer digital camera
    310,000 pixels sensor (640x480)
    Storage: 4MB internal
    Price: $700 USD

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/51156386229_34385b302e_k.jpg


    Nikon Coolpix 300 (1997)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

  • Maobylens
    1595 posts
    2 years ago

    Nikon Coolpix 900 (1998)

    Nikon's third consumer digital camera
    1,300,000 pixel sensor (1280x960)
    Storage: 4MB CompactFlash
    $899.00 USD

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/52098666678_6ea54629e2_k.jpg


    Nikon Coolpix 900 (1998)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

  • MissTillypanorama_fish_eye
    59 posts
    2 years ago

    Fascinating, Thank you for posting this, it is a bit of Nikon history I did not know about.

  • StanDisbrowpanorama_fish_eye
    474 posts
    2 years ago

    Hi,

    The CP 100 was what I habitually used at Ericsson to document the condition of returned cell phones for failure analysis. I used that so much that it inspired the accessories group to make the CommuniCam for the T68. The first cell phone camera. It snapped onto the system connector at the bottom of the phone.

    I was given the first prototype and used it in place of the CP 100. It connected via Bluetooth rather than plugging in via the PCMCIA connector.

    The next model, we put the camera into the phone. And so began a trend.

    Stan

  • Maobylens
    1595 posts
    2 years ago

    Thanks, that's nice 🙂

  • Maobylens
    1595 posts
    2 years ago

    In the end, you are somewhat responsible for the disappearance of compacts and the collapse of the photographic industry 😈

    Bravo 👍🏻 😂 😂

  • StanDisbrowpanorama_fish_eye
    474 posts
    2 years ago

    Hi,

    Yep. I did that. I didn't know I was doing that at the time. Which was when I would have been comparing shots from the CommuniCam against my Nikon D1 and Kodak 460c. So, even though that was 2.75 and 6 MP respectively - low res by today's standard - that was against VGA. No one had anything to worry about back then.

    It was the old case of the lousy camera you have with you being better than the really good camera you left at home.

    Stan

  • Maobylens
    1595 posts
    2 years ago

    It's a bit like my comparison, which I really like

    Between Kodak DCS 100 (1991) and Dycam 1 (1991)
    The first in their respective categories

    live.staticflickr.com/712/22081926225_4b02883337_k.jpg


    Kodak DCS 100 (1991) 100% / Dycam 1 (1991) 100%
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    The Kodak DCS 100 Pro (1991) 1.3MP (1280x1024) $25,000.00 USD
    The Dycam model 1 (1991) 0.10MP (376x276 ) $995.00 USD

  • Maobylens
    1595 posts
    2 years ago
  • Maobylens
    1595 posts
    2 years ago