you are on the new server domainname will switch later
If you can not login please clear cookies
chevron_left
chevron_right
The-Photo forum
  • Home
  • Forums
    • theatersImage Discussions arrow_forward
      • chat_bubbleChallenges arrow_forward
        • camera Edit me an Image
        • camera Photo of the Week
      • chat_bubbleHave your photos Critiqued arrow_forward
        • camera Wednesday C&C
      • Showcase your Photos
      • chat_bubbleWeekly & Topic Image Threads arrow_forward
        • camera Abstract/Experimental
        • camera B&W Threads
        • camera Sunday Cats!
        • camera Weekly Collegial forum
        • camera Daily Outing
        • camera This week through your eyes
        • camera Landscape
        • camera Street Photography
    • theatersMiscellaneous forums arrow_forward
      • Photo Hardware Discussions
      • Industry News
    • theatersOther Photography Talk arrow_forward
      • General Articles
      • Photo History Trivia
      • Open discussions
      • Technical Discussions
    • theatersSite Discussions arrow_forward
      • Governance and organisation
      • Updates & Bugs
    • theatersWelcome arrow_forward
      • chat_bubbleForum Guidelines arrow_forward
        • camera Misplaced Posts
      • Introduce yourself
  • Threads
  • Users
  • Web Site
  • message
  • group
  • chevron_right Threads
  • label Misc Miscellaneous forums
  • label Gear Photo Hardware Discussions

Old pictures are still good

AlanSh
June 4, 2023
chat_bubble_outline 8
arrow_downward
  • link
    AlanSh
    Forum Admin 3257 posts
    June 4, 2023, 2:11 p.m. June 4, 2023, 2:11 p.m.
    link

    I was browsing through some old photos and came across the one below - which I like. When I looked at the meta data, it was taken on a 20D in 2003. I reckon it's just as good as ones I take on more modern cameras.

    IMG_3882 lightened.jpg

    IMG_3882 lightened.jpg

    JPG, 6.5 MB, uploaded by AlanSh on June 4, 2023.

    Dunlin and Photobygms like this.

    favorite 2

  • link
    stevet1
    Members 800 posts
    June 4, 2023, 2:58 p.m. June 4, 2023, 2:58 p.m.
    link
    @AlanSh has written:

    I was browsing through some old photos and came across the one below - which I like. When I looked at the meta data, it was taken on a 20D in 2003. I reckon it's just as good as ones I take on more modern cameras.

    Alan,

    That's a nice picture, for 2003 or otherwise.

    I like the way the shadows fall across the face of the boulders.

    Steve Thomas

  • link
    NCV
    Members 2103 posts
    June 4, 2023, 3:07 p.m. June 4, 2023, 3:07 p.m.
    link

    What is often forgotten, is that photo processing software has had massive improvements too over the years.

    I recently reprocessed a set of pictures taken with my old d300 and was amazed by the results.

  • link
    DePop
    Members 16 posts
    June 4, 2023, 3:44 p.m. June 4, 2023, 3:44 p.m.
    link

    Heartily agree with your thread.

    I'm presently falling back in love with my 7D because of its comfy size, superb build quality and the speed of operation permitted by its wonderfully designed user interface.
    Nothing I do requires mirrorless, a revelation gained by running through several ML bodies.

    So I'm back to Old Reliable, knowing that my skills will never exceed its capabilities. Only certain lenses for it still tempt me.

  • link
    stevet1
    Members 800 posts
    June 4, 2023, 3:58 p.m. June 4, 2023, 3:58 p.m.
    link

    As I browse through other peoples' pictures, I'm always amazed at how nice pictures they have taken with their T3i look.
    I think to myself, "Damn. That's a nice picture".

    Steve Thomas

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1601 posts
    June 4, 2023, 4 p.m. June 4, 2023, 4 p.m.
    link
    @AlanSh has written:

    I reckon it's just as good as ones I take on more modern cameras.

    Sometimes it can even be a little discouraging, to see so little difference between our new acquisition paid a high price, and a twenty-year-old camera. 😁

    You might be interested in the comparison I made between the Canon EOS-1Ds (2002) / Fujifilm X-T5 (2022).
    www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720304918247

  • link
    Deleted Removed user
    June 4, 2023, 4:15 p.m. June 4, 2023, 4:15 p.m.
    link

    Still like my 20-year-old Sigma DSLR [edit]oops, not a Canon, sorry[/edit]

    herbetia lahue.jpg

    herbetia lahue.jpg

    JPG, 782.3 KB, uploaded by xpatUSA on June 4, 2023.

  • link
    WolfsHead
    Members 245 posts
    June 4, 2023, 4:36 p.m. June 4, 2023, 4:36 p.m.
    link
    @NCV has written:

    What is often forgotten, is that photo processing software has had massive improvements too over the years.

    I recently reprocessed a set of pictures taken with my old d300 and was amazed by the results.

    When I bought my first DSLR (a Sigma SD9), I decided to use RAW and have done ever since. Though I also shoot JPG, I don’t ever remember using them. There’s no doubt that software has improved greatly over the years, and I can now reprocess them with much better results - and I expect that to continue as software becomes ever more sophisticated. RAW is truly the digital equivalent of a negative and it allows me to return from time to time to see whether I can improve on my previous attempts.

    UnclePhilly and Deleted like this.

    favorite 2

  • link
    Dunlin
    Members 643 posts
    June 14, 2023, 6:38 p.m. June 14, 2023, 6:38 p.m.
    link

    Well said Alan! 😀

arrow_upward

There are no more posts in this thread.

  • DPRevived.com & the-photo.org are owned and operated by The Photographer's Foundation Limited, registered in England, company number 14795583. Contact us here https://the-photo.org/contact.html
powered by misago