Olympus E-1 (2003)
Olympus E-1 (2003) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Olympus E-1 (2003)
4/3 sensor (17.3 x 13 mm) of 4.95 MP (2560x1920)
The 1st 4/3
Price: $2,000 USD
(with a multiplication factor of 2)
ISO100-3200
Olympus E-1 (2003)
Olympus E-1 (2003) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Olympus E-1 (2003)
4/3 sensor (17.3 x 13 mm) of 4.95 MP (2560x1920)
The 1st 4/3
Price: $2,000 USD
(with a multiplication factor of 2)
ISO100-3200
Not the E-10?
Olympus E-10 (2000) and E-20 (2001) DSLRs were earlier than the E-1 (2003).
However, the E-1 was the first model using a 4/3" sensor.
Both earlier models used 2/3" sensors.
And they weren't real DSLRs, the lens wasn't interchangeable.
Real Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras they are.
No idea why you throw ILC (Interchangable Lens Camera) into the mix.
I've got one of those. Still works but haven't used it in a while.
Made by Sanyo, now Panasonic. Interesting back and forth between these two companies.
This is one of the reasons ( among other things) for which I carry out comparisons through the history of digital technology.
It allows and forces me to use the cameras cyclically. 😎
Olympus E-1 (2003) / Lumix DMC-L1 (2006)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157719835255225
The 1st 4/3 and Panasonic's 1st 4/3
Olympus E-1 (2003) / Lumix DMC-L1 (2006) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
I am currently making my 290 comparisons with the cameras in my collection. 🤡
We know who to go to if we ever need to replicate DPReviews archive of camera tests.
The problem with me is that if a company like Nikon, Canon, or Fujifilm provided me with one of these cameras, I would never return it! 😂
Great camera.
I still use mine from time to time. AF not great by modern standards and gets noisy at fairly low iso but the best ergonomics of any camera I've handled and great jpeg rendering. Cool shutter sound too.
For me also, the noise of the shutter is important, it adds an additional pleasure. 😁
I am actively looking for one right now. I want it because of it's awesome weather sealing and film like output.
Olympus E-1
www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=m570.l1313&_nkw=Olympus+E-1&_sacat=0
By way of example, I paid $105.00 USD for my copy on ebay in 2015
Good luck!
They used to be very common on E-Bay, but yeah, I've noticed that you don't see them anymore and when you do the prices are surprising.
The legendary Olympus E-1 (2003)
The first 4/3, and the first DSLR designed from scratch for digital photography
Here are the comparisons I made with my Olympus E-1
Olympus E-10 (2000) / Olympus E-1 (2003)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157666927038884
The legendary Olympus!
Olympus E-1 (2003) / Olympus E-300 (2004)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157677803913194
The first two Olympus 4/3
Olympus E-1 (2003) / Olympus OM-D E-M1 MkII (2016)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157720195470662
4/3 micro 4/3
Olympus E-1 (2003) / Lumix DMC-L1 (2006)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157719835255225
Premier 4/3
Olympus E-1 (2003) / Lumix DMC-G1 (2008)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157666938719943
1er 4/3 and micro 4/3
Olympus E-1 (2003) / Pentax 645D (2010)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157718212739438
4/3 MF
Canon EOS-10D (2003) / Olympus E-1 (2003)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157703690643861
DSLR 2003
Take care !
I started off my Digital Photography with Olympus E 20n in June 2002, and Progressed E-300, E 510, and OM-D E-M1.
Fun ride from 2002 to present 21 years.
Excellent he's finally of age 😁
A final comparison for 2023
With two Olympus cameras
The Olympus E-20 (2001) and the Olympus E-1 (2003)
Olympus E-20 (2001) / Olympus E-1 (2003) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
For the curious, it's over here 😉: www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720313444038/
Olympus E-20 (2001)
2/3'' (8.8 x 6.6 mm), 4.92 MP (2560x1920) Sony sensor
Price: $2,000 USD
9-36mm (35-140mm) lens
(multiplication factor of 3.89)
ISO 80-320
___________________
Olympus E-1 (2003)
4/3 (17.3 x 13 mm), 4.95 MP ( 2560x1920) sensor
The 1st 4/3
Price: $2,000 USD
Photos taken with the Leica 14-50mm f/2.8-3.5
(with a multiplication factor of 2)
ISO 100-3200
Olympus E-20 (2001) / Olympus E-1 (2003) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
320 ISO and 400 ISO
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720313444038/with/53402186667
Olympus E-20 (2001) 50% / Olympus E-1 (2003) 50% by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Cool comparison. The smaller sensor size of the E20 has more depth of field. I played with either an E10 or 20, don't remember which. Bought a used E1 years later. I need to dig it out and shoot it.
Thanks for the memories,
barondla
The pleasure is mine
And happy holiday season ☃️
Happy holidays to you as well.
Thanks,
barondla
The E10 was my first DSLR. Eventually sold it to a friend who dropped it and turned it into a ILC by smashing the lens off. It was a beautiful camera but suffered from terrible battery life. The accessory LiPo battery cost as much as the camera. I ended up carving a battery grip from wood to hold a model car nicad pack connected via the battery holder. A bit of a bodge but it did work.
I'm impressed, you're a really good handyman. 🎓 👍🏻