It seems to me that jpeg settings in modern cameras and facilities in post processing programs encourage photographers to manipulate their photos so as to achieve a totally unrealistic result. Sometimes it reminds me of the worst of Technicolor, other times it just looks fake. A good example is the first photo in this article on European national parks. If the place really looks like this, I dont want to visit it!
Has the use of technology gone too far?
David
edit
Thread title has been changed from Over the top lack of reality.
In this case, probably so, but I referred to them simply because they illustrate a trend that I actually encounter more frequently on internet photographic fora.
Yes, there is something fake about this picture that is not apparent at first glance. But it is not the worst I have seen. The blue sky in one of the other shots in the article is more disturbing. The pictures I really hate are those cartoonish pictures with garish colours, that always accompany pictures of the Cinque Terre in lifestyle articles.
I read the article, and I would love to get to see the park in France with the prehistoric rock carvings.
The Guardian used to be very strong on picture editing once. In fact most publications had capable picture editors once. Today nobody seems to care about picture quality.
It is not technology that has gone too far, but the lack of culture and taste that has evaporated. The pictures were probably chosen by some youthful unpaid intern , brought up on Instagram.
HDR is a wonderful tool that I use extensively for architectural shots in old monuments, which have a huge dynamic range. But it is very difficult sometimes to get natural results.