• IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    Here is how it looks (Photoshop as the analysis tool, magic wand, tolerance set to zero, anti-aliasing off, contiguous on, 44,600 pixels of the same value):
    Screenshot from 2023-06-30 12-47-40.png

    Screenshot from 2023-06-30 12-47-40.png

    PNG, 431.4 KB, uploaded by IliahBorg 2 years ago.

  • JohnSheehyRevpanorama_fish_eye
    549 posts
    2 years ago

    OK; I give up. What is it?

  • IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    Just an example of a poor edit to get "vivid red", maybe due to clipping in a raw converter too. I was trying to show a trivial check for posterization.

  • DeletedRemoved user
    2 years ago

    Wow - remind me to continue editing at 32-bit floating point Linear RGB in the GIMP ...

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2366 posts
    2 years ago

    w510 (2023_06_27 06_41_46 UTC).jpg

    w510 (2023_06_27 06_41_46 UTC).jpg

    JPG, 3.1 MB, uploaded by DonaldB 2 years ago.

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2366 posts
    2 years ago

    single shot em5mk2

  • IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    I never saw posterization using 8 bits with a gamma 2.2 profile ;)

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2366 posts
    2 years ago

    dont see any posterization, show the edge where its posterized.

  • DanHasLeftForumhelp_outline
    4254 posts
    2 years ago

    I find banding can be more of an issue than posterization if edits are pushed too far when using 8 bits or are they two names for the same thing?

  • IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    Banding is considered to be a form of posterization; I know of a very few corner cases where posterization with 8 bits is unavoidable on a photo. Pushing too far may result in posterization for whatever the image bit depth is, and usually what results in posterization on a display or in print is about the same for any editing space bit depth.

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2366 posts
    2 years ago

    your guess is as good as mine Danno

    www.yourdictionary.com/posterize

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2366 posts
    2 years ago

    it was that long a go i will see if i can find the raw if there was even one.
    i cant even remember how i lit the shinny little seed. i have one in the studio atm and finding it quite hard to replicate the lighting.

  • DanHasLeftForumhelp_outline
    4254 posts
    2 years ago

    In my experience it is usually only with gradients like a cloudless sky or in smaller scene elrments where posterization can become visually unacceptable if edits are pushed too far.

    If I pixel peep I would expect that maybe most images will have some posterization but the question then becomes is it noticeable and unacceptable under normal viewing conditions for the particular image.

  • IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    I doubt that to be found on the main subject of a high-quality image, and posterization isn't about pixels, it's about significant clusters of pixels having no colour variations and thus lacking details.

  • DeletedRemoved user
    2 years ago

    Fortunately for us these days, good editors use 32-bit floating point and a Linear wide-gamut workspace.

  • IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    The destination is still effectively a low-bit monitor or a print ;)

  • JohnSheehyRevpanorama_fish_eye
    549 posts
    2 years ago

    Posterization, to me, is just quantization that manifests visibly. Contour banding is one of the most common and obvious forms that people see, common when they or their software use too much NR for 8-bit displays. If you want to polish a noisy image, you should always add a tad of equally-distributed noise (not Gaussian; it has unnecessary outliers) at a higher precision before converting to 8 bits.

  • JimKassonpanorama_fish_eye
    1738 posts
    2 years ago

    Not all good editors, not all the time. Example: Photoshop.