• Members 7 posts
    April 6, 2023, 9:34 a.m.

    Hi to all,

    I have already photographed the 35mm B/W negatives with a D800 and an old 55mm Nikon macro. So far so good. My questions how to proceed from here. My workflow until now was something like this:

    -Import the nefs into LR.
    -Send them to PS for cropping, invert, levels, save and...
    -Back to LR for further processing.

    But I tried something else and now I am in doubt. Before send the files to PS I first adjusted in LR the exposure in the "negative" nefs (I suppose I underexpose when I shoot the negatives) and then I send them to PS. Doing this I noticed better shadows.Am I right?

    What are your thoughts and advice?

    Thanks!!

  • Members 561 posts
    April 6, 2023, 10:58 a.m.

    I think the problem is probably the way LR processes the images. Its default settings are designed for positive images, not negatives.

    I would suggest that you try setting the LR sliders as follows: Exposure -2.0, then increase Whites to say +65 or more (but not so much as to cause clipping of highlights). That will expand the highlights to show much more detail, which is shadow detail when you invert the image.

    Your original shots should be exposed so that the film base (where no exposure has occurred, e.g. between frames) is just on the verge of clipping, but does not clip.

  • Members 7 posts
    April 6, 2023, 11:53 a.m.

    Thank you!

    I am experimenting right now and I see a lot of potential in manipulating the nef (negative) in LR before invert it in PS (I use the PS just to invert, noting else). The best results I get is by doing some extreme manipulation in LR on the "negative":
    Contrast, Shadows, Blacks: +100
    Exposure to the right almost to clipping.
    Then invert in PS where I get a very underexposed image.
    Then in LR for the final editing.
    It works beautifully!

    I will re-shoot the negs exposing to the right to see if there is an advantage. Thanks for the suggestion.

  • Members 245 posts
    April 6, 2023, 12:06 p.m.

    I assume that LR won’t do inversion and so this is the reason for ‘round tripping’ the image? PS will do all of your required operations, so why not do all the work in PS and cut out the LR stages (or have I missed something)?

  • Members 7 posts
    April 6, 2023, 1:15 p.m.

    Yes LR doesn't do the inversion. I use it for my convenience. For example I can batch crop all the negatives etc.

  • Members 561 posts
    April 6, 2023, 1:27 p.m.

    You can do a simple inversion in LR using the Tone Curve. Click on the grey circle at the top of the Tone Curve panel and then drag the bottom-left point of the curve to the top-left, and the top-right point to the bottom-right.

    After that, the image is inverted (white parts are now black and black parts are now white).

    Screenshot 2023-04-06 at 14.16.35.png

    Screenshot 2023-04-06 at 14.16.35.png

    PNG, 510.7 KB, uploaded by TomAxford on April 6, 2023.

  • Members 280 posts
    April 6, 2023, 1:34 p.m.

    I loaded about 300 images at a time into Adobe Camera Raw, selected all, and inverted them as described above.

    Don

  • Members 7 posts
    April 6, 2023, 2:42 p.m.

    Thank you!
    I know the trick but I don't like it because it reverses the operation of the sliders in the "Basic" panel.

  • Members 177 posts
    April 9, 2023, 4:57 a.m.

    What is your purpose in deliberately underexposing when you shoot the negatives?

  • Members 7 posts
    April 9, 2023, 8:49 a.m.

    Hi!

    I did not deliberately underexposed. It was a mistake. Actually I centered the meter but I could have added two stops of positive exposure without clipping anything. So maybe I should reshoot them.

  • Members 177 posts
    April 10, 2023, 1:06 a.m.

    I also prefer to center the meter, and do not use exposure compensation - I get better copy exposures with center-weighted metering vs spot or matrix.

  • Members 37 posts
    April 17, 2023, 3:02 p.m.

    I use ACR to convert, from a dng file on my Leica CL. I use a Beselar slide duplicator with an 80mm f4 Schneider Componon, this lens I was told was calibrated for 1:1 reproduction. I made a setting in ACR that does the inversion and some minor changes. I then have the positive to work with and it does all right.

    abandon AFrame.jpg

    JPG, 1002.4 KB, uploaded by tomm111 on April 17, 2023.

  • Members 58 posts
    April 22, 2023, 4:35 p.m.

    If you have nothing (no Photoshop, Lightroom etc) and a lot of photos then you could always knock something up in Python (it sort of works for colour images too if you remove the ".convert('L')" ). The script takes all the ".NEF" files in the current directory, inverts them, does a simple contrast adjustment and writes them out as ".TIF" files. It will overwrite any existing files in the current directory so you may want to run this in a scratch space (or add in error checking).

    OriginalRaw.jpg
    The original NEF file

    PhotoshopCoverted.jpg
    Converted in PhotoShop

    PythonConverted.jpg
    Converted using the Python script below

    from PIL import Image, ImageOps
    import glob
    import rawpy
    import re
    
    for i in glob.glob("*.nef"):
        print (f"Converting {i}")
        raw = rawpy.imread(i)
        rgb = raw.postprocess()
        img = Image.fromarray(rgb) 
        ac=ImageOps.autocontrast(ImageOps.invert(img.convert('L')))
        newnm=re.sub("nef$", "tif", re.sub("NEF$", "TIF", i))
        ac.save(newnm)
        print (f"Written {newnm}")
    
    PythonConverted.jpg

    JPG, 39.0 KB, uploaded by Overrank on April 22, 2023.

    PhotoshopCoverted.jpg

    JPG, 42.1 KB, uploaded by Overrank on April 22, 2023.

    OriginalRaw.jpg

    JPG, 37.6 KB, uploaded by Overrank on April 22, 2023.