found that turned them on and exported to tiff. still clipped parts of my white shirt. weird
when exporting select in the export window raw composite
what you are still doing is exporting as RGBHere for the A74 and a common image we all know
as processed
Here is what the raw really looks like
Here is a close look at a target with white being 1 stop from clipping
all i can say is that Raw Digger is not real good in fact i would say its fairly useless as a raw development program.
i can also say that the in camera histogram is very accurate.
What are you babbling on about with "what processing?"
Are you not aware that the tiff 16 bit no longer contains the original raw data but rgb data processed from the raw data?
as the other member said he has experienced the same , so that's all i need to know,
How good is the incamera histogram 👌👌👌No problem but your own raw histogram is showing what you say is not true :-)
At least you have now been taught what a raw histogram is and so you shouldn't stupidly and foolishly try to pass off the ACR histogram as a raw histogram in the future as you did in your op. :-) especially since you claim to be professional photographer.
Mission accomplished!!! 😀
Which is OK, since it's not intended to be a raw development program.
Looks like there's a lot of space on the right or the RD histogram which isn't there in the in-camera histogram.
I wouldn't say that's what it 'looks like'. That's an informational rendering of the raw file, but there are many such renderings that could look very different from each other.
the raw digger clipped the whites on my shirt , the in camera blinkies did give the slightest reading which is what my studio strobes are set to do.
for the record the first histogram is the jpeg. thought you could of at least had a guess
That would have been a waste of my time since you lost all credibility as a supposed professional photographer when you foolishly tried to pass off the ACR histogram as a raw histogram.
prove that it isnt
It already has been proven many times over by multiple members in this thread.
Are you still claiming one of those histograms in your op are a histogram of the actual raw data in the raw datafile?
maybe you should do some reading if you actually have photoshop
helpx.adobe.com/au/photoshop-elements/using/color-camera-raw.htmlAre you still claiming one of those histograms in your op are a histogram of the actual raw data in the raw datafile?
That Adobe article clearly shows the histogram in ACR is not a histogram of the data in the actual raw file. It says the ACR histogram is a histogram of the processed raw data.
you seem to be in the begginer section alot heres another link for you
helpx.adobe.com/au/camera-raw/using/introduction-camera-raw.html
