Accordingly enough to know when the raw clipping hits? Same as with the other cameras? With all camera models I've checked, dozens of them, it was never the case ;)
yep. its so accurate i only have to take 1 image, i havnt once taken several images with different exposures and chosen the correct image. the only problem is in real world use you cant see the rear lcd image very well in the sun let alone the histogram ends i would have to put my close up reading glasses on.
Jim. please stop. I'm too old and grumpy to be amused by one-line quips, however relevant, even though I do it myself. You know dam' well why I put periods in I.S.O.
Coming back thus at everything I say in this thread lowers my credibility, I reckon. If that is your intent ... I'm done.
Easy, there. The QWERTY reference had nothing to do with the periods in ISO. It had to do with the persistence of technical decisions into eras where the original reasons no longer apply.
The back of camera histogram has the red channel hotter than the green. But in the raw file, the red channel is significantly down from the green channels. So is the blue raw channel, which looks on the back of camera image to be close to the green.
Here is the histogram of the highlights:
- all channels are clipped in raw
- there are specular reflections
In-camera histograms didn't tell you that.
This may be irrelevant for the purpose of this shot, but it isn't universally irrelevant, far from it.
Have you checked what's going with red flowers?