• IanSForsythpanorama_fish_eye
    216 posts
    2 years ago

    If I was you, you should really learn about color spaces and how they impact what your raw converter is showing you

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2365 posts
    2 years ago

    I calibrated the image with ACR and you can with PS using nutralize,its not bad but can be out sometimes.

  • DanHasLeftForumhelp_outline
    4254 posts
    2 years ago

    You are proving my point ๐Ÿ˜„

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2365 posts
    2 years ago

    its amazing how much you guys know more than me about photography๐Ÿ˜Ž

    w759.jpg

    w758.jpg

    w759.jpg

    JPG, 14.2 MB, uploaded by DonaldB 2 years ago.

    w758.jpg

    JPG, 7.9 MB, uploaded by DonaldB 2 years ago.

  • DanHasLeftForumhelp_outline
    4254 posts
    2 years ago

    You are setting a very low bar so it's very easy actually ๐Ÿ˜„๐Ÿ˜Ž

  • IanSForsythpanorama_fish_eye
    216 posts
    2 years ago

    Sorry but nothing about that image speaks to me as being natural in detail and color
    with the smearing and over processing and blotchy ness

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2365 posts
    2 years ago

    They grew hair from over sharpening ๐Ÿคฃ

  • IanSForsythpanorama_fish_eye
    216 posts
    2 years ago

    I know several bug guys that would find all of that detail and color anything but natural

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2365 posts
    2 years ago
  • DanHasLeftForumhelp_outline
    4254 posts
    2 years ago
  • IanSForsythpanorama_fish_eye
    216 posts
    2 years ago

    No they just know that it is processing that created that kind of punch and to them it was a fad just like tone mapping was to landscape photography

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2365 posts
    2 years ago

    I recon thay have no idea how to take and stack 70 images to create these images.

  • IanSForsythpanorama_fish_eye
    216 posts
    2 years ago

    No but they do know what natural looking insects appear like and that detail is anything but real, and they are not interested in eye candy that many try and post
    When stacking is done nicely they can look good but the over sharpening and processing is what they don't like, and I kind of agree with them on that

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2365 posts
    2 years ago

    ouch that hurt ๐Ÿ˜ i couldnt find that yapping little dog bitting at the heels, but this fits the bill perfectly ๐Ÿ˜Ž

    pm1w764.jpg

    pm1w764.jpg

    JPG, 288.3 KB, uploaded by DonaldB 2 years ago.

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2365 posts
    2 years ago

    ask them if they have captured a maggot that a fly has just layed with a baby fly inside before that go white.

    w769.jpg

    w769.jpg

    JPG, 4.8 MB, uploaded by DonaldB 2 years ago.

  • IanSForsythpanorama_fish_eye
    216 posts
    2 years ago

    Getting back on track, if you really need to know what a histogram shows you I would recommend Andrew Rodney about what a histogram is
    But then again I would feel he has no time for your games

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2365 posts
    2 years ago

    maybe they sholud practice what they preach, the video quality is crap. Im sure he really knows how to actually use a histogram ๐Ÿ™„

  • IanSForsythpanorama_fish_eye
    216 posts
    2 years ago

    but how can we use a histogram when we have this much variance
    photos.smugmug.com/Temp/Temp/i-dgz8p9t/0/609fc88d/XL/dddd-XL.jpg
    photos.smugmug.com/Temp/Temp/i-VFnd6vK/0/4fdc886e/XL/rrr-XL.jpg
    and how can we use them for raw