• NotsoGloomy1panorama_fish_eye
    92 posts
    2 years ago

    In the middle of exploring how little needs to be included in an image. Ken
    Layer 5 copy.jpg

    Layer 5 copy.jpg

    JPG, 447.0 KB, uploaded by NotsoGloomy1 2 years ago.

  • RokasMpanorama_fish_eye
    61 posts
    2 years ago

    Excellent!

  • NotsoGloomy1panorama_fish_eye
    92 posts
    2 years ago

    Thank you Rokas

  • DMCOpanorama_fish_eye
    244 posts
    2 years ago

    So, my test for images is “would I hang it on my wall at 24x36. Answer, for me: “yes.” This lovely.

  • NotsoGloomy1panorama_fish_eye
    92 posts
    2 years ago

    Thank you DMCO. I also use " hang it on the wall" criteria. Ken

  • BillFerrishelp_outline
    369 posts
    2 years ago

    Lovely image. It is deceptively complex. On the surface, it is - as you've said - just sand, sea and sky. But the geometry created by the lines, and changes in tonality, hues and textures makes the image quite watchable.

    Here's on that is not nearly as complex but does fit the theme of minimalist composition. It's a photo of a recessed wall light and the Milwaukee Museum of Art.

    DSCF0833.jpg

    DSCF0833.jpg

    JPG, 237.2 KB, uploaded by BillFerris 2 years ago.

  • FrankGpanorama_fish_eye
    22 posts
    2 years ago

    Very nice and an interesting take. The scene in general looks familiar to me. Would that by any chance be taken by one of the burn outflows into Druridge? I have lots of views of such scenes but done very differently!

    Frank

  • NotsoGloomy1panorama_fish_eye
    92 posts
    2 years ago

    Thanks for the comment Bill.

  • NotsoGloomy1panorama_fish_eye
    92 posts
    2 years ago

    Hi Frank, this is Anse de Pen Hir in Brittany. Ken

  • FrankGpanorama_fish_eye
    22 posts
    2 years ago

    Oh, OK thanks (sorry for the late reply, I just caught up with this) - it just looks so like a scene I know from up here in Northumberland!