Scene luminance has nothing to do with exposure.

If you did you would not be seeing much, and I would not care

[deleted]

What raw reading and how did a raw file give you a reading of 250 250 250
If it was a raw reading and the ceiling was white you would not get 250 250 250 values if it was truly raw reading

sony a6300. perfect histogram 1 tiny pixel from clipping had to use the 3x jewelers loupe again, raw converted 16 bit numbers read 250 250 250

ooc jpeg read 255 255 255.
How embarressing for you guys the a6300 has been out for 7 years 😂😂😎 and no one had the sense to test the actual jpeg ,your all to busy
looking at the raws.

Your cherry picking now " 16 bit converted raw read 250 250 250" do i need to explain ?

🤣 start posting some sensable material with your camera rather than the arm chair theroies that have brought you all undone 😁

cant wait for the guard dog to arrive 😁😜

Again what was the settings of the processing used to create that 16 bit tiff ?
What WB?
What curves?
What color profile?
What BLE adjustment?
All of these influence how at that 16 bit file was created from that raw data

A very simple test to show your competency in what you are trying to show us, it would be to create a tiff file from that raw file that neutralizes even the BLE and the multipliers use in the WB and the raw converters hidden processing. Just doing this would show yourself how silly you are being at insulting much of us.

But you do not understand any of this is you did you would realize how silly you are being and eating a lot of crow

Idiot ...

as ive said it doesnt matter as the jpeg is clipped. couldnt care less what the raw is because the info is all there.
your out of ammo give up.

Yes and I will ask again
What WB was used?
What color profile was used?
What curves are used?
What BLE was used?

Like you say what don't you understand ?
If you don't understand go back to John's post and review

😁😎

as ive said it doesnt matter as the jpeg is clipped. couldnt care less what the raw is because the info is all there.
your out of ammo give up.

And those values that you converted to a 16 bit file that read 250 250 250 are not raw data

I dont care what the raw file is doing ,the fact remains the OOC jpegs has clipped and unreadable information. the raw does not.
and the camera histogram represents the raw file NOT the jpeg.

zoom in on the camera histogram

You do realize that if you change the color profile that created that jpeg or even the color space used that jpeg image it may not even show clipping

I have read a paper about using the incamera histogram as a luminence meter and they said auto WB is the best setting. My cameras dont
have RGB live histograms.