Scene luminance has nothing to do with exposure.

LOL... man. you need to come up with a better answer than that 😁 your scratching the bottom now.

Non-clipped histogram has a downslope at the right. Yours is classic clipping.

no it doesnt . again you need to play with your camera more, your loosing touch

I have posted images in several threads both here and on dpreview. Feel free to post comments or feedback on any of them 😄

You really have no idea what you are talking about have you 🤣🤣

What Jim posted is totally correct 😊

I can guarantee you 100% that Sony engineers will also tell you your camera's histogram is not a raw histogram.

For a given scene your camera's histogram will vary according to the WB and colour space settings you set which proves your camera's histogram cannot possibly be a raw histogram.

People in this thread have shown you the flaws in your findings and logic. You choosing to not accept them does not make your logic and findings true 🙂

come on people please post some test shots and histograms from your underwelming camera gear.
Thats right your too embarressed because you cant prove me wrong and make a fool of yourselves.
Im going to mow the lawn, so i better see some action shots not arm chair shots. because so far you have all missed the target 🤨😜

Oh it does.
www.rawdigger.com/howtouse/beware-histogram

I don't see it as a waste of time.

A while ago I posted that the reason I changed my mind about leaving DPRevived was that I would miss being a thorn in DonaldB's backside.

If he chooses to continue posting total BS and lies then I am more than happy, along with others, to highlight it 😎 as a community service 😉😊

Your false logic, findings and blatant lies have been proven on multiple occasions in multiple threads by multiple people.

The best part of this thread and your other stupid threads is that no-one is buying the BS you are posting.

Bobn2 is therefore correct when he described you as a harmless troll 😊

I can guarantee you 100% that Sony engineers will also tell you your camera's histogram is not a raw histogram.

For a given scene your camera's histogram will vary according to the WB and colour space settings you set which proves your camera's histogram cannot possibly be a raw histogram.

Photoshop's 16-bit mode is really 15 bits pus one state. But here's a pure white reading in Ps:

oh com on Dunno, has the cat got your shutter finger 😂😂😂

so how does 1 million divissions show highlight clipping greater or more accuratly than 10 😜

can blame it on the poor programming, that has built in default corrections.

He is proving you wrong again 🤣

I have posted images in several threads both here and on dpreview. Feel free to post comments or feedback on any of them 😄

You can jump up and down making a total fool of yourself proclaiming your Sony camera displays raw histograms but your false logic, findings and blatant lies have been proven on multiple occasions in multiple threads by multiple people.

I can guarantee you 100% that Sony engineers will also tell you your camera's histogram is not a raw histogram.

For a given scene your camera's histogram will vary according to the WB and colour space settings you set which proves your camera's histogram cannot possibly be a raw histogram.

You can blame it on the histogram being inaccurate and showing clipping where there is none.

come on danno post some test shots and histograms. but you cant can you you would rather hide and shoot from the chicken coupe instead of manning up at the front line.

Your false logic, findings and blatant lies have already been proven in multiple threads by multiple people so I have no need to provide further proof to what has already been posted.

I can guarantee you 100% that Sony engineers will also tell you your camera's histogram is not a raw histogram.

For a given scene your camera's histogram will vary according to the WB and colour space settings you set which proves your camera's histogram cannot possibly be a raw histogram.