Scene luminance has nothing to do with exposure.

all talk are we now. 😂 ive just about had enough of you guys so now im going to use my methods to show you what skill is.

I usually stay away from criticizing images but there is a lot of artifacts that take away from the image

your all full of it. no photography skills to match your mouth. so you have to post hypothetical images.😂😂

post your own then lets see how good you are. your all talk.

For me there is too much processing ( mind you many may find this as eye candy similarly to the tone mapping fad) I preferer a more natural look with pleasing transitions in the OOF areas for macro work

for starters you cant even take an image of this standard ,so what makes you think you know how to make judjement.. as i said you have no idea ,so unless you can post an image equal or better i would hold you pathetic comments to yourself.

😂😂😂 its 70 images stacked over 1mm 2m FOV , you dont even know the process, what sort of photographer are you ? thats right a paper work photographer
thats thinks he know more about photography😂😂

you wouldnt know what an artifact is shooting extreme macro if it jumped off the page 😂😂 because your an inexperienced
loud mouth . show us the equpiment needed to shoot live subjects of this magnifacation 😁😎 if your looking on the net
you cant because ive invented the equipment 😂 and no one else shoots live at 10 x . now can you give me some more sacastic
advice ? from your inexperience ?

anyone else think they know more while im at it ?

Sorry but it is not my cup of tea I much prefer a more natural look that is not riddled with artifacts

The question would I want too
I am more into the nature look and not the processing to create the wow affect

I don't see the point you are trying to make.

The flaws in your logic and findings have been shown to you. It's obviously your choice to accept them or not.

You are also a proven liar on these forums and you have a history of fabricating images to suit the agenda you are pushing at the time.

Posting images that might or might not be yours is meaningless here.

If you are happy with the photos you post all well and good but again, the flaws in them have been posted in your other threads.

I question your honesty, integrity and competency especially after the nonsense you have posted in this thread and in your raw histograms thread where you posted two histograms and then asked which was the raw histogram when neither was a raw histogram.

im wetting my self because you cant see this detail with the human eye 😂😂 you wouldnt know what the world looks
like that small. I will give you the inexperienced a little bit of advice ,the smaller the insect the more detailed and saturated colour they are
its why i shoot the smallest subjects and even breed them for that reason. any more of your niave advise i should listern to ? shake head.

I don't see the point you are trying to make.

Im now finally over all the BS from the self aclaimed arm chair experts.if you wan to play with the men than you better post some world class
images to prove your point. put up or shut up. im tired of the sarcastic comments to my posts so you better get ready for a different DonaldB.

is another classic example of

🤣🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣😎

I for one, look forward to it.

no text

well its up to you to find a better GIF for me 😁 mike tyson would do 😜

i want a dummy spit one