Scene luminance has nothing to do with exposure.

Well.....if a convicted rapist is your hero I'm sure you can find your own gif of him to suit your personality 😄

And you wonder why I question your honesty, integrity and competency 🤣🤣😎

how do you get them to play ?
media.giphy.com/media/RgtD9LDp1R4AReChJX/giphy.gif

Now you are just being stupid asking stupid questions 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Hopefully the new DonaldB you said is coming will be much smarter than you are 😎

Please do! I think that's the best of all the macros I've seen you post.

What are you talking about? I take dick pics all the time! 😢

You are proving my point 😄😄😎

ive tried to be civil and interactive and all ive got is sarcastic reponces.
members want to play, they better put there images where there mouth is.

BTW this is a 70 image stack of a live moskito 2mm FOV 😁 it takes all day to plan,take and process the image.

I don't see the point you are trying to make.

The flaws in your logic and findings have been shown to you. It's obviously your choice to accept them or not.

You are also a proven liar on these forums and you have a history of fabricating images to suit the agenda you are pushing at the time.

Posting images that might or might not be yours is meaningless here.

If you are happy with the photos you post all well and good but again, the flaws in them have been posted in your other threads.

I question your honesty, integrity and competency especially after the nonsense you have posted in this thread and in your raw histograms thread where you posted two histograms and then asked which was the raw histogram when neither was a raw histogram.

And earlier you asked for a more suited to you animated gif - Mike Tyson, a convicted rapist,

Shown on Natgeo wild

Showcased on DPR

Showcased on DPR

I much more prefer a more natural and less processed look and not riddled with unnatural artifacts when it comes with an image that is stacked, here is one with 52 in the stack, One of the reasons for this is how the image is to be used

While some people get hooked up on macro as being the about the most magnification they can achieve I am more interested in a natural and capturing the insect as an insect that is not staged.

xxx

xxx

xxx
A great deal of what I like to photograph is more about the interaction of the subject and its environment

I personally do not believe you have the skill set to take the images below

xx

xxx

xxx

xxx

xxx

xxx

xxx

This attitude you have that no one here really knows nothing about photography really should stop because you are only fooling yourself
This I am a professional so I know best is not helping you much
Lets have a look at where we stand today, I guaranty you that the people here that are explaining to you how you are wrong are very good photographers as anyone else in the skill of taking photographs ( not the one trick pony showing over processed spiders).
But on the other hand we have someone who does not even understand the fundamental reason as to why Jim's histogram shows clipping in colors for there histograms.

Please sit down and learn what a histogram is, raw, color, red, blue, green, luminosity and what that data in those histogram represent.

This attitude you keep presenting is just what one would expect from someone hiding their lack of understanding and refusal toooooo leeeaaarrrrnnnn!

😂😂 when you can shoot an ant like this then you can match the masters. your ant is pathetic, period.

You are squirting words out of the wrong hole again 😄😄😎

If you like the photos you post then all well and good but to extrapolate that to meaning everyone else must as well is ludicrous 😄 The image you posted is blurry where it really needs to be sharp and there are unattractive halos which just shouldn't be there.

Learn from someone that shoots this 🙄you can keep your advice for someone else.

But you yourself posted 2 histograms and then asked which was the raw histogram when nether of them was a raw histogram 🤣😎

this is from a toy camera like the one Danno uses and a toy lens thats not even a macro lens.
its all about the eye detail . or havent you learnt anything.

The flaws in your posted images have been pointed out to you here and in your other threads.

It is obviously up to you whether you choose to accept them or not 🙂

As I mentioned, you are a proven liar on these forums and you have a history of fabricating images to suit the agenda you are pushing at the time.

here you go danno a new avitar for you. 🤣😜

Or maybe this one 🤣🤣🤣

You continue to repeat the same comments and so I repeat the same replies 😄

You do not get exclusive rights to being a stuck record 🤣🤣🤣😎