you are on the new server domainname will switch later
If you can not login please clear cookies
chevron_left
chevron_right
The-Photo forum
  • Home
  • Forums
    • theatersImage Discussions arrow_forward
      • chat_bubbleChallenges arrow_forward
        • camera Edit me an Image
        • camera Photo of the Week
      • chat_bubbleHave your photos Critiqued arrow_forward
        • camera Wednesday C&C
      • Showcase your Photos
      • chat_bubbleWeekly & Topic Image Threads arrow_forward
        • camera Abstract/Experimental
        • camera B&W Threads
        • camera Sunday Cats!
        • camera Weekly Collegial forum
        • camera Daily Outing
        • camera This week through your eyes
        • camera Landscape
        • camera Street Photography
    • theatersMiscellaneous forums arrow_forward
      • Photo Hardware Discussions
      • Industry News
    • theatersOther Photography Talk arrow_forward
      • General Articles
      • Photo History Trivia
      • Open discussions
      • Technical Discussions
    • theatersSite Discussions arrow_forward
      • Governance and organisation
      • Updates & Bugs
    • theatersWelcome arrow_forward
      • chat_bubbleForum Guidelines arrow_forward
        • camera Misplaced Posts
      • Introduce yourself
  • Threads
  • Users
  • Web Site
  • message
  • group
  • chevron_right Threads
  • label Misc Miscellaneous forums
  • label Gear Photo Hardware Discussions

Sigma SD-14 (2007) / Sigma Quattro H (2016-17)

Maoby
Oct. 30, 2023
chat_bubble_outline 4
arrow_downward
  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1600 posts
    Oct. 30, 2023, 1:45 p.m. Oct. 30, 2023, 1:45 p.m.
    link

    Sigma 10 years apart

    I finally made a comparison between my Sigma SD-14 (2007) and Sigma sd Quattro H (2017)

    The results can be found here : www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720312225868

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/53287377120_c12063c12f_h.jpg
    Sigma SD-14 (2007) / Sigma sd Quattro H (2017)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Sigma SD14 (2007)
    4.6 MP (2652 x 1768) APS-C Foveon sensor
    Or 14 MP (2652 x 1768) x3 layers
    Price: $1,580.00 USD
    Photos taken with the Sigma 18-125 mm 1:3.5-5.6 DC
    (with a multiplication factor of 1.7)
    100-800 (1600) ISO


    Sigma sd Quattro H (2016-17)
    25.56 MP APS-H sensor (6192 x 4128)
    Price: $1,200.00 USD
    Photos taken with the Sigma 24-105mm F4 DG OS HSM Art
    (with a multiplication factor of 1.35)
    ISO 100-6400

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/53285988302_76f483ca11_h.jpg
    N°05 Sigma SD14 (2007)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/53287129443_4242de39a7_h.jpg
    N°05 Sigma Quattro H (2016-17)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Your remarks are welcome!
    www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720312225868

    OpenCube, ArvoJ, sattva and 1 other user like this.

    favorite 4

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1600 posts
    Dec. 13, 2023, 6:14 p.m. Dec. 13, 2023, 6:14 p.m.
    link

    live.staticflickr.com/65535/53286235553_98037b810c_h.jpg
    Sigma SD-14 (2007) / Sigma sd Quattro H (2017)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

  • link
    DavidMillier
    Members 531 posts
    Dec. 19, 2023, 10:54 a.m. Dec. 19, 2023, 10:54 a.m.
    link

    What's your opinion having done all these comparisons? I have a SD14 but I've never used a Quattro. I don't think a great deal of my SD14, because my unit suffers from yellow-green colour casts. You have to be so careful how you shoot and process it to avoid these, and I don't think it is worth the hassle. But it seems the performance of the SD14 is quite variable unit to unit.

  • link
    Maoby
    Members 1600 posts
    Dec. 19, 2023, 11:53 a.m. Dec. 19, 2023, 11:53 a.m.
    link

    I think so, of the three Sigmas I've tested, the SD9 SD14, and Quattro H
    The SD-14 disappointed me the most, with its lack of consistency!
    And in the end, the Sigma SD9 is by far my favorite of the three.

    live.staticflickr.com/1867/44721412052_96701e8f7a_h.jpg
    Sigma SD9 (2002)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Last but not least, Sigma is more efficient in lens design. 😉

    Deleted likes this.

    favorite 1

  • link
    DavidMillier
    Members 531 posts
    Dec. 19, 2023, 6:34 p.m. Dec. 19, 2023, 6:34 p.m.
    link
    @Maoby has written:

    I think so, of the three Sigmas I've tested, the SD9 SD14, and Quattro H
    The SD-14 disappointed me the most, with its lack of consistency!
    And in the end, the Sigma SD9 is by far my favorite of the three.

    live.staticflickr.com/1867/44721412052_96701e8f7a_h.jpg
    Sigma SD9 (2002)
    by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

    Last but not least, Sigma is more efficient in lens design. 😉

    I've got one of those too, and I don't like it either! Colour is too yellow in warm light for my taste and it exaggerates blues and totally desaturates greens. Good for B&W. But that's just my opinion, plenty of people still like the SD9. Mine keeps my SD14 company in the attic. My favourite Foveon was the DP2M but even that one wasn't good enough to persuade me to keep it. I've given up on Sigma.

arrow_upward

There are no more posts in this thread.

  • DPRevived.com & the-photo.org are owned and operated by The Photographer's Foundation Limited, registered in England, company number 14795583. Contact us here https://the-photo.org/contact.html
powered by misago