Sigma SD9 (2002)
3,430,000 pixel (2268 x 1512) 3X Foveon sensor
The first Sigma Digital APS-C (factor x1.7)
Storage: CompactFlash
$1,800 USD
Sigma SD9 (2002) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Sigma SD9 (2002)
3,430,000 pixel (2268 x 1512) 3X Foveon sensor
The first Sigma Digital APS-C (factor x1.7)
Storage: CompactFlash
$1,800 USD
Sigma SD9 (2002) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
This was also my first DSLR. With some practice, I got good images from it - but it underlines the importance of RAW. I can re-process the images in modern software and get better results than I could obtain from Sigma Photo Pro, though that seemed miraculous after darkroom processing colour prints!
Was the SD9 battery grip the same as the SD10 one, and how many batteries did it hold. I have an SD9 & SD10 but never saw the grip for them.
Hello S,
The SD9 inherited two camera batteries in the grip, presumably from the SA-9, and got four AAs added in the carrier on the underside. The SD10 kept the carrier but lost the two in the grip.
Oops. misunderstood your question ... Marc's response applies mo' better.
What modern software are you talking about?
My Battery Grip holds eight AA batteries, I have no idea for the compatibility for the SD10, the information is probably easy to find on Google
Last time I fired up my SD9 and SD10 (last summer) the SPP version I used (I think it was SPP6.8.2) worked fine with the SD9/10 RAWs. Tomorrow I'll pull up some old RAWs from my external HD and check them out again with SPP6.8.2.
I have an album of SD9 and SD10 photos I took around 2008 on Flickr (scroll way down in my album list). I didn't list the SPP version I used to process them, something I do now with my photos.
Sandy Fleischmann on Flickr
Currently, I'm using Sigma Photo Pro version 6.7.3
Comparisons made with the Sigma SD-9
How does the Sigma SD-9 compare with its direct competitors?
Or facing the younger generation ( Quattro, D500 )
Sigma SD-9 (2002) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Sigma SD-9 (2002) / Pentax *ist D (2003)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720303846044
Duel 2002-2003
Sigma SD-9 (2002) / Sigma Quattro H (2016-17)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157711306817163
Sigma mount
Sigma SD-9 (2002) / Nikon D500 (2016)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157674080070711
Sensor duel
Sigma SD-9 (2002) / Canon EOS-1Ds (2002)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157673329850817
Duel 2002
FinePix S2 Pro (2002) / Sigma SD-9 (2002)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157690138962951
Duel 16 years already!
Nikon D100 (2002) / Sigma SD-9 (2002)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157689499135542
Duel 2002 (The start of the first affordable DSLRs)
Canon EOS D60 (2002) / Sigma SD-9 (2002)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157709202833057
Duel 2002...
Sigma SD-9 (2002) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
Comparisons made with the Sigma SD-9
***Thank you for making all these comparisons. I think you might be the only person out there doing this.
How does the Sigma SD-9 compare with its direct competitors?
Or facing the younger generation ( Quattro, D500 )
Sigma SD-9 (2002) by Marc Aubry, sur FlickrSigma SD-9 (2002) / Pentax *ist D (2003)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720303846044
Duel 2002-2003Sigma SD-9 (2002) / Sigma Quattro H (2016-17)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157711306817163
Sigma mountIt's interesting to see the samples from the first camera with a Foveon sensor and the latest camera with a Foveon sensor. The photos of the house shocked me a bit. The color of the shutters is SO different.
Sigma SD-9 (2002) / Nikon D500 (2016)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157674080070711
Sensor duelSigma SD-9 (2002) / Canon EOS-1Ds (2002)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157673329850817
Duel 2002FinePix S2 Pro (2002) / Sigma SD-9 (2002)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157690138962951
Duel 16 years already!Nikon D100 (2002) / Sigma SD-9 (2002)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157689499135542
Duel 2002 (The start of the first affordable DSLRs)Canon EOS D60 (2002) / Sigma SD-9 (2002)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157709202833057
Duel 2002...
Sigma SD-9 (2002) by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr
This makes me want to get an SD9 (and an SD10), just to see what they are like. I'm sure I can sell it/them for about what I pay to buy it/them. I've been considering making a website about Sigma cameras, and that would be a good start, I guess. I'd have to shoot the photos with my SD Quattro H though.
;)
Good luck with your procedures 👍🏻
@Maoby has written:Comparisons made with the Sigma SD-9
Sigma SD-9 (2002) / Sigma Quattro H (2016-17)
www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157711306817163
Sigma mountIt's interesting to see the samples from the first camera with a Foveon sensor and the latest camera with a Foveon sensor. The photos of the house shocked me a bit. The color of the shutters is SO different./photos/maoby/]Marc Aubry[/url], sur Flickr
A whopping 25 degrees of differecet in hue according to my screen color-picker, the H at 350 and the SD9 at 15 !
This makes me want to get an SD9 (and an SD10), just to see what they are like. I'm sure I can sell it/them for about what I pay to buy it/them. I've been considering making a website about Sigma cameras, and that would be a good start, I guess. I'd have to shoot the photos with my SD Quattro H though.
You might prefer the SD10 Scott. Less batteries to worry about and "better" color.