• Members 46 posts
    July 29, 2026, 4:01 a.m.

    The SET UP
    Gone is the day when all you had to do was grab your camera and head out for a day of shooting. Today, we have to be electronic wizards with a Phd in science to get it all right. And, if you think it is cheap to get it all right then you've a lesson coming for you. (I know most viewers of street object to capturing subjects at close range with eye contact because it appears to invade a subject's privacy. Unfortunately, that is the sort of street that I do. Generally I shoot within 6 to 8 feet of my subject. I fully display my camera. I do not in anyway secret my activity. Some subjects don't object. When they do, if they give me a chance, I explain what and why I am doing what I do. Most seem o.k. with it after I've explained. If they still are not happy I delete the photo and move on. I am not afraid of people nor of photographing them. It seems most street portrait shooters are. Presently, I am delving into a new aspect of this by applying digital art effects to photos I've shot. I hope to post some of those when I feel comfortable with doing it.)
    SetUp.jpg

    SetUp.jpg

    JPG, 261.2 KB, uploaded by Catcher on July 29, 2026.

  • Members 1906 posts
    July 29, 2026, 9:49 a.m.

    Wile E. Coyote lives...

    P1189967a.JPG

    P1189967a.JPG

    JPG, 6.6 MB, uploaded by Bryan on July 29, 2026.

  • July 29, 2026, 10:34 a.m.

    Looking forward to seeing these.

    Alan

  • Members 46 posts
    July 29, 2026, 3:44 p.m.
  • Members 46 posts
    July 29, 2026, 4:03 p.m.

    The Sweeper

    This is an ordinary street shot taken with a Nikon S8100 camera in auto mode. There was no special effects applied in-camera. The art effects seen here were applied in editing. This is something that I have been experimenting with. What concerns me is that it stands outside of the normally expected conventions of street photography which I try to shoot within such as: black&white or mono, square frame, etc. Should anyone who does street find this offensive in any way please state why it offends you. Maybe I can alter this 'style' in some way so that it is more acceptable. Or maybe it belongs in a different thread. One more appropriate for photos edited in this way. Thank you for looking. (For some reason the photo did not load as usual. If you click on the photo it can be viewed.)

    TheSweeper.jpg

    /edit by Arvo: based on your comment I made it load here - if this was not intended, then I apologize and can remove it again./

    TheSweeper.jpg

    JPG, 80.3 KB, uploaded by Catcher on July 29, 2026.

  • Members 46 posts
    July 29, 2026, 4:16 p.m.

    Alan, I went ahead and posted the photo thinking that you could just delete it if you wished. Please notify me if you have. Thanks.

  • Members 2110 posts
    July 29, 2026, 5:52 p.m.

    Welcome to the forum, I am looking forward to seeing your photos that you captured with this setup.

  • July 29, 2026, 6:13 p.m.

    Just post it. We are a friendly bunch here.

    Alan

  • Members 46 posts
    July 29, 2026, 7:48 p.m.

    Thank you Arvo. How did you do this so I will know next time?

  • July 29, 2026, 8:07 p.m.

    You know already :) Upload image, click on square icon next to attachment - this writes image link into post. I just clicked on your uploaded image icon, that's all.

  • Members 2110 posts
    July 29, 2026, 8:28 p.m.

    My wife told me to stop swearing so I won’t. Who cares what others think about someone else’s creative process? We don’t have street photography police here so you can post whatever you like.

  • Members 46 posts
    July 30, 2026, 4 a.m.

    O.K. Thank you

  • Members 46 posts
    July 30, 2026, 4:08 a.m.

    Original Photo of The Sweeper Before Art Effect Was Applied

    This is the original photo of The Sweeper that I posted previously. I thought you might be interested in seeing its original form. (Sorry. But, I must be doing something wrong when I upload the image. Click on the thumbnail and the image will display.)

    sweeper.jpg

    sweeper.jpg

    JPG, 129.8 KB, uploaded by Catcher on July 30, 2026.

  • July 30, 2026, 9:51 a.m.

    I think I prefer the original, though it is rather small, and the colours are rather garishly saturated! I dont care for the x pattern on the manipulated version, but I suppose they are of the essence.

    Dont mind me: keep at it!

    David

  • Members 2110 posts
    July 30, 2026, 10:39 a.m.

    Or used to live!

  • Members 1906 posts
    July 30, 2026, 12:13 p.m.

    They drove away before I could ask where they got the sticker - he is being kept alive even if they cancelled the cartoon...

  • Members 46 posts
    July 30, 2026, 3:25 p.m.

    What Shall We Talk About

    My preferred style of street is to photograph individual people or situations. Generally I don't take photos of street scenes or scenes where people are in them. I thought this photo would be appropriate to discuss street photography in its many aspects. What shall we talk about? (For some reason loading the photo only loads thumbnails rather than the full sized photo. I am not doing anything different than in the past. I have no idea why it is doing this. Click the thumbnail and the full sized image will display.)

    DSCN8736chat.jpg

    DSCN8736chat.jpg

    JPG, 319.1 KB, uploaded by Catcher on July 30, 2026.

  • Members 1543 posts
    July 30, 2026, 4:41 p.m.

    Welcome to the forum!
    Even if it doesn't match one's own style, it is always pleasant and enriching to see different ways of doing things and expressing oneself, so it will be a pleasure to see your contributions.
    As for the images of the street sweeper, I must say I like both: a more formal portrait or a more colorful, painterly reinterpretation—each with its own appeal, whether more documentary or more expressive...