• SteveMonkspanorama_fish_eye
    374 posts
    2 years ago

    You're certainly getting out to some fascinating locations at the moment. I'm curious what the carvings in the upper left depict in this shot? I was also impressed with the period electrical cable running above the fern, St Columba was clearly well ahead of his time.

  • SteveMonkspanorama_fish_eye
    374 posts
    2 years ago

    Thanks. Apparently the geopolitical status of Todmorden is a bit complicated. The Lancashire / Yorkshire boundary follows the River Calder, which runs through the middle of Todmorden and the town hall itself was built such that it straddles both counties! It seems the town has been considered to be wholly within Yorkshire since 1888, but became part of Calderdale (wherever that is) in 1974. It does have an Oldham post code though, which would imply it's part of Lancashire, but apparently not.

  • SteveMonkspanorama_fish_eye
    374 posts
    2 years ago

    Ooh that does look angry, did it develop into a worthy storm? Also, is that a lonely bench I see lurking in the middle distance?

  • SteveMonkspanorama_fish_eye
    374 posts
    2 years ago

    That looks like a formidable mountain. Spectacular countryside. What film stock did you use? I'm thinking something along the lines of FP4 judging by the grain, but I could be completely wrong.

  • SteveMonkspanorama_fish_eye
    374 posts
    2 years ago

    Neither did I until I realised it didn't seem to be getting any nearer for most of the walk. Once I'd reached the top of the hill I estimated about 10 minutes to reach the tower. Half an hour later I arrived. It's a big menacing thing close up, wouldn't look at all out of place in a dystopian sci fi movie.

  • SteveMonkspanorama_fish_eye
    374 posts
    2 years ago

    According to an article from The Lancashire Telegraph, it means "a pool" and indicates that the hamlet was set up around a source of water.

  • SteveMonkspanorama_fish_eye
    374 posts
    2 years ago

    I agree. Certainly downsized to this resolution there's not a lot in it. I did spend quite a bit of time colour and exposure matching these, straight out of the cameras they had quite different casts.

  • 2 years ago

    Were you processing raw files?

    David

  • Vahurpanorama_fish_eye
    457 posts
    2 years ago

    Nice trip report, I enjoyed it, almost like walking myself there, huffing and puffing. But I can't imagine how this tower was built in old days: to get all the stones up there...

  • Vahurpanorama_fish_eye
    457 posts
    2 years ago

    BW theme this week... Film has its character, some look like shot 100 years ago.

  • Vahurpanorama_fish_eye
    457 posts
    2 years ago

    For some reason I caught this week's BW vibe when processing images, but this particular photo lost something with BW conversion. Here is colour shot, it explains why I took the shot in first place...
    P8250410_DxO-1.jpg

    P8250410_DxO-1.jpg

    JPG, 405.1 KB, uploaded by Vahur 2 years ago.

  • Fireplace33panorama_fish_eye
    1188 posts
    2 years ago

    Thanks Steve

    Grain size ?
    The film used here was AGFA PAN APX 100, it should have a relatively fine grain with 100 ASA.
    ...but I also felt that the grain size in these results is a bit more than I would have expected, and so I've already ordered a supposedly finer grain film for my next B&W trip, it's the
    Fujifilm Neopan Acros 100 II

    anyone have any experience with these two films?

  • Fireplace33panorama_fish_eye
    1188 posts
    2 years ago

    Well I'm guessing, the Nikon Z7 is the second shot, and the first shot is from a Fuji :-)
    The first one has less chromatic abberation, visible if you compare the top right hand corner and look at the purple colour of the small branches against the bright sky. What lens was used here?

  • SteveMonkspanorama_fish_eye
    374 posts
    2 years ago

    Yep.

  • SteveMonkspanorama_fish_eye
    374 posts
    2 years ago

    Yep, you're right, the one on the left is some sort of Fuji and the Z7 is on the right. I guess the filename gave that away, I must cover my tracks better in future.

    In both cases the highlights were blown, so I think what looks like chromatic abberation is actually just incorrectly recovered highlights around the blown edges.

    I've attached a 100% side by side of the images from C1P showing before and after adjustment (Fuji on the left again). BTW, only one of those images is 100%, the other has been scaled to match.

    top-corner.jpg

    top-corner.jpg

    JPG, 1.7 MB, uploaded by SteveMonks 2 years ago.

  • Wormsmeatpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    Pretty but I think I prefer the previous image.

  • Fireplace33panorama_fish_eye
    1188 posts
    2 years ago

    Indeed 😎

    Glad to hear that the Z7 wasn't producing that purple colour "under normal conditions" :-)

    I guess the question is ,...
    51 or 102 MP ?

  • ChrisOlypanorama_fish_eye
    1532 posts
    2 years ago

    Luckily no storm occurred and yes, the lonely bench was there, waiting...