• Members 806 posts
    Aug. 24, 2024, 9:53 p.m.

    Please don't tell me that you don't like Turkish coffee ! It is not as easy as it seems to make but when done nicely no drink can beat it.

  • Members 806 posts
    Aug. 24, 2024, 9:57 p.m.

    This one is very nice.

  • Members 806 posts
    Aug. 24, 2024, 9:58 p.m.

    It is indeed.

  • Members 806 posts
    Aug. 24, 2024, 10:08 p.m.

    The Dune's ornithopters šŸ˜„. I have just finished "God Emperor of Dune"

  • Members 789 posts
    Aug. 24, 2024, 10:22 p.m.

    Good idea. But if I go back now the puddle will be gone, it was taken 9 years ago.

  • Members 961 posts
    Aug. 25, 2024, 1:02 a.m.

    I remember slogging through the first 3 Dune books as a young teenager - I had completely forgotten about the spice and sandworms...

  • Members 961 posts
    Aug. 25, 2024, 3:23 a.m.

    Immediately made me think of Apocalypse Now and Jimi Hendrix...

  • Members 3318 posts
    Aug. 25, 2024, 5:24 a.m.

    Nice photos but it's a pity the bodies are all too dark showing next to no detail.

    I see on one of them you used f/7.1, 1/6400s ISO 800. I photograph bees in flight and rarely go faster than 1/2000s and aperture of f/4.6, f/5 or f/6.3 tops gives me more than enough DOF.

    Just like many people advise letting helicopter blades and propeller blades on fixed wing aircraft blur a little to show the aircraft are actually in flight and not "frozen" in mid air, for me the same applies to bees and similar insects in flight. Letting wings blur a little is very ok.

    Your dragonflies look like they could be "gliding" which of course they're not.

    Using a slower shutter speed and/or wider aperture will let more light onto the sensor (resulting in a lower ISO) and hopefully enable more detail on the insects' bodies to be visible.

    Letting more light onto the sensor also reduces visible noise and especially on a smaller M43 sensor your denoising algorithms (in camera or in post) will thank you for it.

    Anyway, just some food for thought you might like to consider experimenting with the next time you are photographing dragonflies, bees or whatever.

  • Members 3318 posts
    Aug. 25, 2024, 5:44 a.m.

    NEXT STOP?

    This was taken with an APS-C sensor.


    dprevived.com/media/attachments/18/52/1MzltO9otVBzkZqdPMH3q8ktHk3rIJSSsYKzyGnxbqCAhozGbSX5wkNL1W0tMCXT/bee.jpg

    bee.jpg

    JPG, 120.1Ā KB, uploaded by DanHasLeftForum on Aug. 25, 2024.

  • Members 961 posts
    Aug. 25, 2024, 6:17 a.m.

    All well and good. However the whole intent of these shots was to catch the reflected light. I had taken countless photos with a lesser camera last summer with the same intent but could only get blurry light due to a lower attainable ss. This is a vast improvement in that regard. I also had quite a few last summer with more of the full spectrum of light. That will be the next goal now. The fact that the body is then in shadow is not a consideration and indeed adds to the "military choppers" effect noted by @Wormsmeat. I did try and recover shadows but haloing was becoming evident so gave up on that.

  • Members 3318 posts
    Aug. 25, 2024, 6:26 a.m.

    No problem.

    Regarding recovering the shadows, putting more light on the sensor will result in more light from the shadow areas as well, resulting in a larger SNR and giving you more flexibility for raising shadows in post, especially if raising shadows using 16 bit raw files rather than with 8 bit sooc jpegs which offer much less flexibility.

    As I said, just some food for thought.

  • Members 789 posts
    Aug. 25, 2024, 6:34 a.m.

    Pleasing tones in this.

  • Members 961 posts
    Aug. 25, 2024, 10:36 a.m.

    Just another point or two. If you knew the specs of this lens, you would know that at full zoom, f/6.3 is wide open and that the lens is more sharp stopped down from that. So suggesting otherwise is going against both possibility and accepted wisdom. Further, dragonflies are a lot larger than bees and if I am lucky enough to get one close, I really do have to start thinking about f/8 and above to get the whole thing in focus... Horses for courses...

  • Members 3318 posts
    Aug. 25, 2024, 10:44 a.m.

    No problem.

    But I'm sure not everyone uses the camera and lens you used.

    In any case I explained why I normally use a slower shutter speed.

    If you're happy with you're photos that's fine.

    I said my suggestion was just food for thought for you or anyone else following this thread.

    These forums are not one on one conversations and both members and non members can see them.

  • Members 961 posts
    Aug. 26, 2024, 11:21 p.m.

    Who'd'a thunk it?

    If you need to insist on playing Guru, it helps to get your facts right...

  • Members 3318 posts
    Aug. 27, 2024, 12:01 a.m.

    It was general advice only, not specific to your gear.

    As I said, not everyone uses the camera you choose to use.

    Many people have multiple camera bodies and lenses and so have more options to use the best combo for a job than you do if you are limited to one camera.