• Fireplace33panorama_fish_eye
    1279 posts
    a year ago

    One of these ladies asked me if I could make this photo better?
    "It’s lovely but a bit blurry, you can’t see any details, especially when you zoom in a bit", she said.

    I looked and it is very low res, probably the focus was missed and the phone did the best it could to remove the noise from a situation that was probably quite dark.
    Then someone slapped a “PARTY” sticker on it and sent it by Whatsapp. Terrible :-)
    I hasten to say that it was not taken by me.

    I said I can’t do anything at all, but know a few experts that might be able to do something?

    I haven’t tried AI but have seen some remarkable results.
    If anyone wants to have a go and see if any details can be recovered or probably better to say “generated“, then I’d be interested to see what you can do.

    Thanks in advance
    Trevor

    WhatsApp Image 2024-03-14 at 16.22.16_1526ee3b.jpg

  • LeeJaypanorama_fish_eye
    273 posts
    a year ago

    Focus Magic.

  • DeletedRemoved user
    a year ago

    Two things spring to mind:

    RLT deconvolution - good for trying to improve "focus"
    Wavelet decomposition - good for editing at specific detail levels i.e. 1px, 2px, 4px, 8px, etc.

    Don't know of any particular AI that would do it.

  • bobn2panorama_fish_eye
    a year ago
  • DeletedRemoved user
    a year ago

    compMetodos.jpg

    I like the bottom left - wavelets at 1px and 2px plus UnsharpMask in the GIMP

    Bottom right is wavelets plus deconvolution in RawTherapee

    compMetodos.jpg

    JPG, 1.3 MB, uploaded by xpatUSA a year ago.

  • sybersitizenpanorama_fish_eye
    167 posts
    a year ago

    Is the posted original really only 640 x 640 pixels?

    Anyway ... here's a face-recovered, slightly sharpened (I'm not sure that sharpening things other than the faces would be a benefit), slightly color adjusted, enlarged version produced by Topaz Photo AI. I would also crop it.

    Party_TPAI.jpeg

    Party_TPAI.jpeg

    JPG, 232.4 KB, uploaded by sybersitizen a year ago.

  • 748 posts
    a year ago

    Used Topaz Photo AI on autopilot

    whatsapp-image-2-Edit.jpg

    whatsapp-image-2-Edit.jpg

    JPG, 433.6 KB, uploaded by Sagittarius a year ago.

  • sybersitizenpanorama_fish_eye
    167 posts
    a year ago

    Interesting how Autopilot also emphasized the otherwise hidden face behind the text bubble.

  • Fireplace33panorama_fish_eye
    1279 posts
    a year ago

    Thanks for showing the results of those programs and settings, appreciate that.
    None of them make any sort of improvement, the results could even be regarded as worse than the admittedly very poor input I provided.
    The results are full of visible digital pixel noise.

  • Fireplace33panorama_fish_eye
    1279 posts
    a year ago

    Many thanks! Yes the photo I was sent really only had that lousy 640x640 resolution. The original from the phone would have had more, but I don't have that. The Whatsapp reduces the photo size considerably :-(
    This Topaz AI in the way you've used it has has made quite an impressive improvement on the faces.
    You can now see more details eg. :
    - improvement of the teeth, so they now look like individual teeth and not just a whiteish block
    - the eyes have a definite pupil and you can see the whites of the eyes, wheras the original have just a dark blob.
    - the lips are better defined
    - the skin looks smoother, not so blotchy like in the original
    and it hasn't introduced any obvious visible pixel artefacts which is really good.

    However, what does detract from the overall result is that although the faces are definitely well improved, other objects (as you mentioned) are not improved.
    So the hands, the skin around the neckline, the flowers and the glasses all still look "terrible" and the photo still has the overall look of being quite blurred

  • Fireplace33panorama_fish_eye
    1279 posts
    a year ago

    Many thanks too for this!
    Of the three replies I would class this as the best overall result so far, because not only are the faces improved but also all the other details are sharper and have more details and contrast too. The saturation, warmth and brightness have also all been tweaked for the whole image. So the overall impression looks very good considering the terrible input that you started with.
    However,
    In the version from Topaz AI from sybersitizen where he concentrated on "just the faces", "his" resulting faces are definitely better than from this autopilot version, with even less blur and even more details.

    I suppose the best result would be a combination of those two Topaz AI results :-)

    Thanks for showing us what Topaz AI can do.

  • Fireplace33panorama_fish_eye
    1279 posts
    a year ago

    That is quite amazing, I guess that person was originally "removed" for some reason with the bubble :-)
    I never noticed before, but the hidden face is also just about visible in the original

  • sybersitizenpanorama_fish_eye
    167 posts
    a year ago

    Photo AI offers a lot of flexibility. It can reduce noise, sharpen, crop, upsample, and adjust color and lighting. It can also confine some actions only to masks that it autogenerates or that you generate. My example could have (and should have) had more areas sharpened, which would be easy to do by modifying the mask. I might still prefer to leave some areas like the back wall unsharpened, though.

    The face recovery feature is one of its highlights, and it's adjustable. The upsampling that I applied can also help.

    The app now also has the ability to 'remove' things and replace them with AI generated content that's intended to look natural. This sometimes works wonders and other times just makes a mess. I tried it on the extended arm of the hidden person, but what was generated didn't look any better.

    The various parameters could all be fine-tuned in a way to improve that photo more than either of us has done. Finally, adding the use of traditional manual retouching techniques would take it even further. It just depends on how much time the user spends.

  • 748 posts
    a year ago

    This image has been also processed with AUTO tone in LR classic before sending to Topaz.

  • Stigpanorama_fish_eye
    599 posts
    a year ago

    I wonder why no one thought to straighten the image somewhat? No follow-up image taken after dozens of bottles being consumed?

  • sybersitizenpanorama_fish_eye
    167 posts
    a year ago

    That's not one of the capabilities of the AI software. But try it. This approach introduces distortion and loses information from the sides.

    Before-After.jpg

    Before-After.jpg

    JPG, 232.3 KB, uploaded by sybersitizen a year ago.

  • Stigpanorama_fish_eye
    599 posts
    a year ago

    When comparing the image on the left, it feels like [to me] as though the photo was taken on a boat...lol
    Depends on what your priorities are, I presume...