I see it as a docu image and b&w pp certainly accentuates the daily life of local residents. Reflections and rainy atmosphere really adds to the interest.
I see it as a docu image and b&w pp certainly accentuates the daily life of local residents. Reflections and rainy atmosphere really adds to the interest.
General reply to y'all re the rooster on the tracks.
Oh dear, the opinions are universal and I bow to the collective wisdom.
It's one of a series I did on Train Street in Hanoi. Others will appear here eventually.
What I was seeing were the two pairs of legs. I cropped where I did thinking I was making that point. It would have been better if the human was more to the side so the rooster head stood out. I had done some playing with the top crop (pun alert) but taking it higher included lots of extraneous stuff and colour on each side of the human and it also made the rooster smaller and the contrasting feather details were lost.
Loved the whole post. The photos convey the scale, the detail and a glimpse into the magic of movie making. The text is essential so we understand what we are seeing. A film that deserved better reception.
The connections to the film trailers ice the cake. We jump from the sets to what Scott created from them.
Lots and lots to enjoy.
I didn't find these gloomy. Here, the much loved dam in a completely different light. 2 and 4 stood out for me because the ice is most apparent in these.
The shots are probably best appreciated by those of us who have become aficionadoes of the dam over many years. Here we see it in a totally different light. But it gives me a small problem. I can't look at these in innocence. I have many, many memories of previous dam scenes and they are all in colour. This series doesn't sit comfortably with them. Of course, the ice colours will be different to the golden/copper tones of the past shots. But seeing these as ongoing studies of "the dam" I feel the shots should also be in colour, even if as is probable, the colour hasn't the appeal of those from previous visits.
If this group is viewed in isolation from the previous images, that's a different matter.
I agree completely with Pete. Quite apart from the colour, the completely flat backgound has given in a posterized result that doesn't feel right to me with the subject. I much prefer the kind of lighting and background you use with a similar subject, Lilias in glass, a couple of weeks ago.
Abstracts Below
I always try for a window seat when flying. Often clouds, tropical haze or the night mean there is not much to see, but sometimes watching the world slide by or the sculptures of clouds is more fun than the trashy films on offer, and those occasions more than make up for the disappointments. This was the case on my recent flight from Beijing to Frankfurt as we flew over Chinese Inner Mongolia, Mongolia and Siberia (Air China is still allowed to fly over Russia !), especially as the landscape had had its first frosts and snowfalls to highlight contours, but was not yet completely dumped to pure white, turning the landscape into abstract paintings. I chose B&W partly to add to the abstraction, and also to mitigate against strange mixed colour casts caused by the windows themselves, reflections, the phone's limited ability or its software.
First, some general comments about photos from above. Much of what thrills me about photography is from having my eyes opened to perspectives I haven't seen before. Aerial photography does this and I too want a window seat for the same reason as Pete. Planes that have auto dimming windows must be banned. Rarely have I been lucky enough to see snow and ice fields. It's literally awesome and justifies this overused word.
While I enjoyed them all, the first and last of Pete's shots particularly appeal. Probably because there are stronger lines in these.
As it happens, The Guardian newspaper a couple of days ago published a series on Australia from the air. I'll include a link here for those who enjoy this kind of photography.
www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/gallery/2026/feb/06/australian-landscapes-photographed-from-sky
Reflections on a rainy day
Another excellent street shot.
Several things I like a lot. The line of people is a mix of people coming and going. I feel immersed in a real moment.
It's a good composition. While the figures form a more or less line across the top, the space at the bottom uses the reflections to repeat the shapes and we know more about the weather and why the subjects are dressed as they are. Again, as viewer I feel immersed in this photo.
Winter variety
Winter variety vs garden one...
Great White Frozen North (Toronto, Canada) is in a grip of winter with the longest spell (a month) of freezing temps { - 15C to - 25C (5F to -13F)}. Global warming at it's best.
A nice selection of images showing different aspects of your cold snap.
I very much like the first. It uses vertical lines to link three visual planes, each of which gives a different take on the conditions. The reflected street with the suspended icicles is beautifully caught with moody blue/greys.
I have to add, Extreme cold snaps like this are exactly what is predicted as global warming creates periods in which polar caps, north and south, are moved around.
KINGDOM OF HEAVEN
On the last three-nights leg of our Moroccan trip last month, we stayed in Ouarzazate, which is a lovely 5 hour drive southeast of Marrakech.
On those days we went to the Oasis of Skoura and its kasbahs, of which I shared an image two weeks ago.But we also visited the fortified walls and battlements of Jerusalem and the grand entrance to the fortress of Kerak while we were there.
Let me explain.
Ouarzazate is home to the Atlas Studios, one of the biggest studio complexes in the world.
Already in the middle of last century, big budget films produced by production companies of many different nationalities, descended on Ouarzazate for its proximity to arid desert and rocks, snow-capped mountains in the distance and lush oases (and the ancient kasbahs) in the region, for any movie set in such landscapes.
Small studio lots were created for indoor scenes, first in the center of the city. You can visit now one of those places as the "Cinema Museum": it is a collection of rooms and courtyards that can serve as Roman, Greek, Egyptian, Arab and many other interiors (including throne rooms, markets and dungeons), all filled with dusty and rather silly looking props and costumes - and a collection of ancient moviemaking tools like editing tables, dollys, etc. It is a quaint little stop.Outside the town there is now a large new studio complex that is not open to visitors.
Inbetween sit the Atlas Studios.
- This is partly still operational for certain productions (one area was non-accessible because a movie was starting production).
- Partly it is a museum/theme park (with plush hotel) where you can roam freely or get a nice guided tour through sets from a few blockbusters, mainly set in Egypt ("The Mummy", but also "Astérix & Obelix - Mission Cleopatra"), but also in Arab fairly tale environments ("Sindbad", "Prince of Persia") and even in Tibet ("Kundun", because filming the story of a Dalai Lama in the actual location did not sit well with Chinese authorities). The place has been home to a large number of biblical epic tales for movie and TV. That was really good fun.
But for me the biggest "wow" came from visiting another site that requires a (not too expensive) extra ticket and for which being by car is useful, because it is a specific set, further in the desert towards the mountains, at the end of a rocky, sandy and bumpy offroad ride of an estimated 3 or 4 kilometers. We were the only visitors there on the day. We parked our car in the shadow of large medieval walls and showed our ticket to the gatekeeper who was clearly happy to see the monotony of his day broken up by visitors (he sits all day during opening hours in a small guard shack with a television, and with his motorcycle parked next to the shack - I bet he gets more visitors on other days).
This huge construction was built specifically for the Ridley Scott blockbuster "Kingdom of Heaven" (with Orlando Bloom, Eva Green, Edward Norton, Liam Neeson, David Thewliss, Jeremy Irons, Brednan Gleeson and many others) The movie tells a tale of redemption, tolerance and humanity against the backdrop of the early Crusades, when Christians and muslims fought over Jerusalem and its holy sites, waging wars "over insults that we did not make, against people who are not alive anymore to avenge them".
It's a fairly good movie : history (reasonably accurate if romanticized) under the usual Ridley Scott sauce of epic battles, lots of smoke and dust, countless horses and flags in a strong gale. It's entertaining, but in this case with a strong message too.
Here is a trailer:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=KartNo8EDWYAnd here is a breakdown of a pivotal scene (not battle, but communication and respect - it captures the atmosphere and spirit of the movie well):
www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFaUdNMjXt8But back to the building and the site in general.
After the production, these same structures (or parts thereof) were reused in many other productions, but nothing anymore of the same scale.
The movie "Kingdom of Heaven" is 21 years old by now, but its set has stood the test of time remarkably well. I say "remarkably" because this set is not made of stone (only all the floors are), but consists of a gigantic maze of scaffolding, different plastics (like rocks and mountains in Disneyland) all painted and plastered and weathered and textured with great care. You can take steps up the battlements and enter the towers to take a gangway to the opposite side, and inside the tower you will be in a structure of steel piping and scaffolding, with rickety stairs and ladders leading up and down. That is a weird experience, and it is almost unbelievable, if you really breathe in the scale of this movie set.
Most of it is now bare walls and floors and ceilings (for a movie, it needs extras, dust, water and huge amounts of props to come alive).
But some parts that have been used close up in battle scenes, are intricately detailed with fine woodwork and wrought iron.
There are also long arched halls and gangways that have been used for skirmishes and intimate scenes, and allow for depth and mood lighting.The overall impression is gigantic, on a scale that has to be seen to be believed.
Here are four images that try to capture some of that.
- The first shows an enormous ramp leading up to the interior entrance of a fortress (not Jerusalem in the movie, but the Templars' fortress at Kerak). You can tell from the shadow that this is already inside a first line of walls.
- The second shows some of the detail and texture of the construction, with a wooden shelter on the battlements. In the distance: you can spot a trebuchet that was used in a scene of the siege of Jerusalem, with the Atlas Mountains as farther backdrop..
- The third is a view from those same battlements over two courtyards with multi purpose buildings: a marketplace/washing basin in the first courtyard, and a vaulted chapel in the next, with battlements and defensive structures surrounding them.
- The fourth image is taken from the highest point I could climb to (through that scaffolding interior, over those rickety ladders). This is from the very top of the highest tower seen in the third image, and looking back in the other direction, with in the distance again the Atlas Mountains and below a medium sized arena/fighting pit not used in "Kingdom of Heaven" but in one of the "Gladiator" movies. (Ridley Scott is a frequent user of the studio...)
To get a sense of scale: Els is in the first and the fourth image. I almost needed binoculars to see her...
I like the geometry and contrast in the second, third and fourth of these. The first might benefit from being a bit more level.
Rooster. Hanoi.
Nice character and detail in the bird here. And again, the use of geometry adds interest. I'm not sure if the photo would be better or worse without the human partly in the frame.
A gloomy submission of Dam Ice
Here's what it looks like when temps remain in the teens for several consecutive days, a real oddity here. The edges of the rivers and lakes do freeze. It was gloomy on this frozen morning a couple of days ago. Only a few weary and unmotivated birds showed up beneath the dam and down the Pearl. But the dam itself had some interesting patterns (to me, since I see it all the time and notice small differences). Probably not so much for a viewer.
[![js-2.jpg]
What nice examples of how to do photography on the kind of day where I can't motivate myself to bring a camera along. The dam photos are the strongest for me.
Grape Lane, York. A scene of sharp highlights and very deep shadows - something I would normally try to avoid. The final image involved heavy push/pull processing of the raw file in Lightroom.

Photo page: www.flickr.com/photos/jason_hindle/55055969992/in/dateposted-public/
KINGDOM OF HEAVEN
This photo is my favorite.
I find the detailed information and the photos very entertaining.
Thank you for that.
Rooster. Hanoi.
This rooster is truly a special specimen.
I've never seen colors like these.
A gloomy submission of Dam Ice
Another interesting series of photos.
I chose this one because the birds bring the photo to life.
Abstracts Below
This is my favorite photo.
It has a gentle atmosphere.
Winter variety
This photo is by far the best one for me.
These colors reflected by the icicles are superb.
Grape Lane, York. A scene of sharp highlights and very deep shadows - something I would normally try to avoid. The final image involved heavy push/pull processing of the raw file in Lightroom.
Photo page: www.flickr.com/photos/jason_hindle/55055969992/in/dateposted-public/
I'm not sure what is happening here. Are you saying that this image is the final image you wanted after heavy push/pull processing or is this the image you worked on?
As it is, I don't think the image works and it looks as if it needs lots of processing.
The bright area of brick buildings makes them the subject of this image but they don't seem either interesting enough or prominent enough from the sightlines to warrant being the subject. The central figure and "Sale" shopfront look more likely subjects but the darkness of these areas plus the competition for attention from the brighter brick areas negates them.
Unless you were trying for something I haven't understood, I think the current highlights need lots of reducyion and the shadow areas need to be considerably raised. If the dynamic range of the original RAW file doesn't allow this, it's an image I'd discard.