* Wednesday C&C "No Theme" Thread #934 / Revived #154 on 2026 03 11*

The shots are a report on the architecture of a particular building. The extraordinary roof and the sightlines it creates to the elevators are what make this structure so striking. Additionally, I gather that the lighting here can change to play with the forms. On this occasion, the colour shots are preferable because the colour changes are significant to a viewer's response. The B&W photos give line and tone. That's fine but as it is a work of architecture where changing colours are integral, the colour versions (and it needs more than one photo to tell the story) are essential.
The last two give a sense of the scale of the roof and overall structure. I feel this is essential in appreciating the structure.

In different ways, they are all individually good shots . Collectively there is a variety of interest that we share along what is clearly a very pleasant hike.

Photographically, it's the last three I enjoyed most. Number 4 for the repetition of the curve in the mountains in mid ground and again in the foreground. The repetition of line is all important given the limited tone range.
5 for the repetition of line and then the variation of the lines with the subject trees and the interpretations we bring to them. Sharply observed and carefully composed.
6 is my favourite for the reasons Chris has already pointed out.

Is this a rectangular crop from a fisheye lens? The central V looks solid- something like an upturned boat with the water surface symmetrical and higher than the sides. I don't recall ever having seen a photo before that has done this. I like it most for the novelty value "What am I looking at?"

Was this intentional? The tip of the bull's horn looks very uncomfortable indeed. In which case it's a funny/dramatic shot.
If that wasn't the intention, I think you should have changed your shooting angle (or picked a different moment) to get a clearer outlining of the shape of the bull. There's a similar problem with the legs. It looks like a six legged bull because of the confusion behind the statue.
A wonderful statue though. Full of power, menace and grace with the light bringing out the musculature.

One of the great truths. The timeless rebirth of life and beauty from the decay of the old.
The skeletal structure of the second shot ,makes the point strongly. Shot 1 does the same in a gentler way.
Looking at these as a series, the last is perfectly positioned. Pure beauty on its own with gentle curves rather than the jagged lines of the preceding. An optimistic finale.

These are kinda wonderful, especially in black and white. In the first b & w, you have a real decisive moment as the fellow in baggy pants leaps across the base of the escalator/stairs, a modern day Cartier-Bresson interpretation. The second reminds me of the whale fossil that occupies the ceiling of the state natural science museum. The contrasting lighting in that one is much more artistic in the monochrome version. Excellent work and excellent choice in how to process these in monochrome.

Beautiful images! Snow where it seems it ought not to be is more magnetic than snow in expected places. In eucalyptus? In what looks a lot like US southern yucca or relatives of Joshua trees? My own favorite snow pictures are of cactus.

BTW the eucalyptus is my favorite, the delicate striped bark is so graceful with that sprinkling of snow.

The purple CA in the second one needs some adjustment. Either the CA sliders in LR or even just reducing the purple/magenta tones would help it a lot.

Nice series, each telling a different part of the story of winter in your mountains. The first is a lovely scenic with that icy water lurking beneath the blue veneer of ice. The fourth is another favorite with the echoing shapes of those wavy diagonal lines.

What a curious, confusing, and engaging image! I can't really imagine how what I'm looking at appears in real life, which is fine. Love a good mystery. The giant set of 3 arrowheads or shark teeth cannot be reconciled visually so we have to keep coming back, looking again, shaking our heads and walking away. Well spotted!

A well exposed and properly captured image of an interesting statue with an interesting building in the background. The flowing shapes on the ground lead us to the bull statue and help us study it from various angles. The people are not especially interesting, and some of them are in awkward positions. It's one of those scenes where I wonder if a slower shutter, allowing them to blur, might have produced a more interesting version.

It's a rectangular infinity or Vanishing edge pool and the image was taken from the corner. Sorry for confusion.

It's a rectangular infinity or Vanishing edge pool and the image was taken from the corner. Sorry for confusion.

Very sharp image thanks to Leica lens, I reckon. Spain or Portugal?
I wish the bull was more isolated, but I guess being in urban environment it is not always possible.

Aboslutely no need for your apology. Figuring such things out is part of the fun and your shot is intriguing.

That is the most peculiar sight : those tropical plants in snow!
All three are well framed, excellently exposed and with good saturation.
They get the idea across perfectly.

I often also use a fisheye in such circumstances, but I usually stand higher to get a really prominent V-shape at the bottom of the frame.
The low vantage point does work perfectly though, because it gets us intimately close to the water spilling over the edge, and we can see that surface tension on the water creates a really cool "rounded" effect.

Good shot of the bull on that sidewalk/square.
Seeing how the person almost gets impaled by the bull's horns, I cannot help but wonder if this timing and framing was deliberate?

I agree with the preference for this one.
But the four together tell the story of that dead trunk and branches taken over by the flowery overgrowth.

I enjoyed the tour and have not much to add.
The shots work well individually.
To be considered an essay, there are a few missing pieces to tie the images together, because to the viewer it is not immediately clear that they are from the same hike or location. They could be a collection of images harvested over more time and in different places.