• ChrisOlypanorama_fish_eye
    1576 posts
    3 days ago

    Just amazing effect. Visually very pleasing and unusual. Well done.

  • ChrisOlypanorama_fish_eye
    1576 posts
    3 days ago

    Amazing shot. Very mesmerizing. One can look and look and discover various shapes and colours and textures. Wonderful wonderland.

  • barondlapanorama_fish_eye
    265 posts
    3 days ago

    Another excellent image. The colors in the background look like "digital" flowers. Cool capture. These images say sci-fi time travel to me.
    Thanks for sharing,
    barondla

  • barondlapanorama_fish_eye
    265 posts
    3 days ago
  • doctorpanorama_fish_eye
    673 posts
    3 days ago

    A minimalistic, geometric composition, with a nice textured touch...

  • doctorpanorama_fish_eye
    673 posts
    3 days ago

    Thanks, Chris, I'm glad you like it. I discovered part of that grid during processing, while playing with the slider structure, because i thought it was lost with the panning...

  • doctorpanorama_fish_eye
    673 posts
    3 days ago

    I looked for a nice, colorful background. And what better than a flower shop? 😀
    Truth is that with this technique, any light, any element in the background, becomes very striking...

    IMG_0424.jpeg

    IMG_0424.jpeg

    JPG, 1.7 MB, uploaded by doctor 3 days ago.

  • barondlapanorama_fish_eye
    265 posts
    3 days ago

    That is a neat printing method. Haven't tried anything like it...yet. It came out great.
    Thanks for sharing,
    barondla

  • 3DGunnerpanorama_fish_eye
    186 posts
    2 days ago

    Strange flower.
    A "flower" resulting from the graphic representation of mathematical algorithms (fractal).

    Flower.jpg


    Taken with a virtual camera.

    Flower.jpg

    JPG, 538.8 KB, uploaded by 3DGunner 2 days ago.

  • barondlapanorama_fish_eye
    265 posts
    2 days ago

    Awesome "flower". Looks menacing. Like the colors. The glow around the flower is nice. Is a super powerful computer needed to create these?
    Thanks for sharing,
    barondla

  • 3DGunnerpanorama_fish_eye
    186 posts
    2 days ago

    Thank you!
    It's more about the time it takes to render the image, which depends on the performance of the processor and the software used.
    Strictly about this image, rendering can take at least a few minutes, depending on the resolution required and several parameters that can be set especially in the lighting scheme.

    The longest it takes is until a sufficiently interesting formula is found, because a lot of testing has to be done. In a few hours something interesting can be found.

    Problems arise if the intention is to get a video clip, in which case it may take several days to get the necessary images for a few seconds of movement.

  • Fireplace33panorama_fish_eye
    1246 posts
    2 days ago

    Very cool looking images :-)

  • barondlapanorama_fish_eye
    265 posts
    2 days ago

    Video fractals seem a lot like stop motion animation photography...slooow. very time consuming, but cool. Hope to see more.
    Thanks for sharing,
    barondla

  • 3DGunnerpanorama_fish_eye
    186 posts
    a day ago

    A firestorm.

    Let's guess what is captured in the picture.😁

    Firestorm .jpg

    Firestorm .jpg

    JPG, 293.6 KB, uploaded by 3DGunner a day ago.

  • MikeFewsterpanorama_fish_eye
    1928 posts
    a day ago

    Venice

    Venice.jpg

    Venice.jpg

    JPG, 2.4 MB, uploaded by MikeFewster a day ago.

  • barondlapanorama_fish_eye
    265 posts
    a day ago

    Wow! Be safe. Impressive image.
    Thanks for sharing,
    barondla

  • barondlapanorama_fish_eye
    265 posts
    a day ago

    Looks like a modern painting. Colors are fantastic. To me, this is a very happy image.
    Thanks for sharing,
    barondla

  • doctorpanorama_fish_eye
    673 posts
    a day ago

    Apocalypse now…

  • doctorpanorama_fish_eye
    673 posts
    a day ago

    Agree, nice image…

  • 3DGunnerpanorama_fish_eye
    186 posts
    21 hours ago

    It is a very common process.🙂
    Hint: The image is from the macro category, ~22mm FoV.

  • 3DGunnerpanorama_fish_eye
    186 posts
    18 hours ago

    So, in the picture are the residues that remain on the matchbox after a match passes by and lights up.😀

  • barondlapanorama_fish_eye
    265 posts
    17 hours ago

    Ah, very macro and very creative. What magnification is this at?
    Thanks,
    barondla

  • 3DGunnerpanorama_fish_eye
    186 posts
    9 hours ago

    Magnification describes the size an object will appear projected on your camera's sensor, compared to its size in real-life.

    The use of the term "magnification" is confusing for most photographers, because the results obtained for a given magnification ratio are dependent on the size of the sensor used to collect the information and the size of the screen on which the image is viewed.

    What is relevant is the size of what is captured in the focal plane. In this case, we have a 22mm wide capture.

    If we use FF category cameras (36mm sensor width) an optical system that provides a magnification of ~1.65x (1.65:1) is necessary.

    If we use "APS-C" sensor cameras with a 24mm sensor width, an optical system that provides a magnification of ~1.1x (11.1:1) is necessary for same results, etc...

  • 3DGunnerpanorama_fish_eye
    186 posts
    6 hours ago

    The lightning

    The electrical discharge that ignites the gas in a piezoelectric lighter.

    lightning.jpg

    lightning.jpg

    JPG, 195.2 KB, uploaded by 3DGunner 6 hours ago.