What cameras are people using to compliment their medium format system?

In which way? I am also getting older, but not sure what you mean.

You know when you let out an involuntary groan when you pick up your bag or you miss the shot after holding the camera for a while because you can no longer lift it to your eye...

I seem to have done something to my right shoulder because after carrying the GFX50s for an hour or so and I'm extremely reluctant to move my arm because of spasms. Never used to happen.

Currently only the Sigma DP1 and DP2 Merrill. I do have a Fuji S5 Pro, but don't have Nikon lenses for it.

I shoot with 100s complimented by the Fuji XT5 and Z7…considering swapping out the Z7 for an SL2 if I can find a well maintained one at the right price. The XT5 is my travel camera with fast primes 23 1.4 and 56 1.2 or just the 16-55 or 18-55.

The SL2 is a tempting travel option as well with a couple of Sigma contemporary primes or the new Leica f/2 35.

There are so many great cameras to choose from and try to buy used whenever possible given my tendency to swap out cameras…

Rod

I uses and actually say that m43rds is the best second system to the Fujifilm GFX cameras. Both are 43rds, and the m43rds system can have very fast lenses and is small and discrete. My Em1mk1 with metabones adapter and Sigma 18-35mm is faster to focus and has less dof than a gfx camera with 32-64mm lens.

I like to think of my GFX outfit as the second system to my m4/3 cameras. 🙂🙂🙂

Hi

I compliment my GFX 100 with a GFX 50R and a Fujifilm X-H2.

Considered to sell the 50R but I’m not sure yet.

Best regards

Morten

Another one using micro 4\3 here. Primarily Olympus. Some excellent lenses in their m.zuiko range e.g f2.8 zooms, 45mm and 75mm primes). I use the lightweight body (E-M5, now 're-born' as OM-5). The 20mp sensor is capable of very good results in decent light subject to all the usual variables that affect quality output regardless of the equipment - but mainly user error!

It's been interesting to read everyone's responses to this question. I ended up selling my M10 and bought a Canon R5. The body by itself is small, lightweight, has weather dealing and is very capable. I mucked up the lightweight and size aspects buying L glass for the camera. I did buy a small 24mm f/1.8 STM lens for when I want a small form factor. Overall I'm happy with the decision. For me, this camera allows me to get images that would be difficult or impossible to get with the M10. The complicated menu structure is not my favorite, but I guess is necessary for what this camera can do. It really makes me appreciate how Hasselblad has built their menu system.

Rich

In addition to my GFX100s, I use a Nikon Z9 for action and wildlife, and a Sony A1 for travel.

An EOS-3 from 2003, but since the EOS is the better camera I prefer the idea that it's the GFX that's complicunting the full frame.

A minor point, and unimportant to anyone other than those who get irritated by minor points...

complement = something that fills up, completes, or makes better or perfect [the correct usage for this thread]

compliment = say nice things about

"The lawyer complimented the policeman" means a different thing from "The lawyer complemented the policeman". One letter different, very different meanings.

I have a Sony a7R4 & 200-600. I'd dump the Sony stuff if Fuji could extend their total reach to around 500mm through lens + TC combo. The simplest way would be to develop a quality 2x TC.

You could go down to Apcrop

An EOS APS-H and a PMF go very well together 😀

www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720308541118

Canon EOS-1D/ Pentax 645D by Marc Aubry, sur Flickr

Hi,

Or a Kodak 760c and a P645D. Over here, a Nikon D1H as well. A three CCD experience. :)

In practice, though, I am still pairing a Df with the P645D. However, with used prices where they are, I'm looking at used P645Z bodies. I think I can get far more use out of the CMOS than I do the CCD.

I have given up waiting for a P645 with the 100 MP sensor.....

Stan