• IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    I didn't demonstrate that. You shouldn't accuse people of cheating based on nothing.

  • DanHasLeftForumhelp_outline
    4254 posts
    2 years ago

    That is your opinion as is your right to have.

    What I wrote conveyed the meaning and context correctly.

    In any case you are continuing to prove my point that you are the type of person who does not practise what they preach, so I don't take you seriously.

    You suggest to people to not reply to my posts and then you make a fool of yourself by continuing to do so. How dumb is that? lol :-D

  • DeletedRemoved user
    2 years ago

    And here you are yet again with your inimitably rude and confrontational style!

    At one time in the era of the Exposure Triangle diatribe I was 100% on your side vs. the others - but expect no more support from me, now that you have made it very personal with that last sentence.

    I await your next pathetic attempt at the coveted thread-winning Last Word.

  • JimKassonpanorama_fish_eye
    1738 posts
    2 years ago
    A7M01521-Full-4736x3132log.png

    PNG, 99.6 KB, uploaded by JimKasson 2 years ago.

  • IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    I told him so, he prefers to ignore it. Maybe he was tricked by zebras or histogram. Anyway, he dialed -0.3 EV EC.
    Also, this isn't raw, this is lossy:
    Screenshot from 2023-05-27 21-11-54.png

    f/4 wouldn't be my choice either.

    Screenshot from 2023-05-27 21-11-54.png

    PNG, 1.8 MB, uploaded by IliahBorg 2 years ago.

  • DanHasLeftForumhelp_outline
    4254 posts
    2 years ago

    Yep, you are continuing to prove my point :-D

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2399 posts
    2 years ago
  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2399 posts
    2 years ago
  • DanHasLeftForumhelp_outline
    4254 posts
    2 years ago

    Your definition of exposure is different to Jim's.

    Your definition of exposure is how dark or light a photo looks on the medium it is being viewed on. That is actually image lightness not exposure.

    Exposure is the amount of light that struck the sensor per unit area while the shutter was open.

    A lot more light could have been put onto the sensor without clipping the raw data.

  • IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    Oh boy. Pigeons and chess.

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2399 posts
    2 years ago

    I took the image and its how i wanted to expose the image. so its perfect. Jim has yet to enter the comparrision and post a converted raw thats better than the jpeg. and Btw you havnt either. 😉
    1521.JPG

    1521.JPG

    JPG, 87.9 KB, uploaded by DonaldB 2 years ago.

  • IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    According to Sony's own raw converter you clipped the shadows.

  • IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    You didn't shoot it in raw :) Your arw is lossy compressed.

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2399 posts
    2 years ago

    its still 14 bit

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2399 posts
    2 years ago

    and its shot in apsc mode. so everyone wouldnt complain about the file size.

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2399 posts
    2 years ago

    the camera says i didnt.

  • DanHasLeftForumhelp_outline
    4254 posts
    2 years ago

    Nope, you got the image lightness you wanted.

    A lot more light could have been put on the sensor without clipping the raw data.

    Exposure is the amount of light that struck the sensor per unit area while the shutter was open.

  • JimKassonpanorama_fish_eye
    1738 posts
    2 years ago

    I did. You ignored it.