Will you stay here if DPReview revives?

  • 85 votes.
  • Voting ends on May 10, 2023.
  • Started by AlanSh on May 5, 2023.
Stay here and enjoy the posts
32 votes, 38% of total.
  • 32 votes, 38% of total.
Go back to DPReview and enjoy the [psts
11 votes, 13% of total.
  • 11 votes, 13% of total.
Visit both
42 votes, 50% of total.
  • 42 votes, 50% of total.
  • Members 535 posts
    May 15, 2023, 1:36 p.m.

    I've seen his wallet πŸ‘€

  • May 15, 2023, 3:16 p.m.

    Jeff Bezos calls me 'Sir'.

  • Members 535 posts
    May 15, 2023, 3:23 p.m.

    Are you sure that’s how he’s spelling it? πŸ₯Έ

  • Members 360 posts
    May 15, 2023, 6:23 p.m.

    Mostly focus, shake and shutter shock issues. There are many more issues in there, but given the timespan and reliability/repeatability of the gear/test, I can mostly forgive them that.

  • May 15, 2023, 6:44 p.m.

    Shows how careful you need to be.

  • Members 976 posts
    May 15, 2023, 7:02 p.m.

    Among other things, lens changing, focus changing, light changing, shots aligned by eye, uncontrolled reflections, uncontrolled flare, sub-optimal light sources, photos fading, no info on SPD, no spectral data of the target, no flat field.

  • Members 360 posts
    May 15, 2023, 7:08 p.m.

    Well, I don't know how others have it, but proper focus/sharpness check on the test photos is vital part of the procedure in my book. Even more basic/trivial than "101" practises. How in the world could they not keep that in check. That is not lack of care, it is close to willful negligence. 🀦
    I can see how item position, item version or lighting situation can be tad different in time, but not this.

  • Members 976 posts
    May 15, 2023, 7:22 p.m.

    Ummmm....

  • Members 360 posts
    May 16, 2023, 11:19 a.m.

    It is very hard to keep stuff constant for 10+ years. Not that it is acceptable, but there is no choice...

  • Members 976 posts
    May 16, 2023, 1:01 p.m.

    I objected to 'tad'. I accept 'generations'.

  • May 16, 2023, 1:27 p.m.

    Which emphasises how hard it is to do it properly - unless of course you approach it as a proper bit of experiment design.

  • Members 976 posts
    May 16, 2023, 1:52 p.m.

    "But all good enlarges are diffuser enlargers".

  • Members 72 posts
    May 16, 2023, 5:52 p.m.

    FWIW I just saw a Tony Northrup video where he suggests that "someone inside DPReview" is in negotiations to buy it.
    Just saying.
    Don't shoot the messenger. 😏
    We will see.

  • Members 535 posts
    May 16, 2023, 6:12 p.m.

    I remain cautiously optimistic that this is true…while accepting that I find it completely believable that Tony Northrup would make that video based on no more than the statements Richard Butler has made publicy in DPR comments.

    Not shooting anyone…over this.

  • Members 14 posts
    May 19, 2023, 6:16 p.m.

    I stated as much on DPR a couple weeks back, even suggested that the closure notice was intended to add time pressure and extract concessions in negotiations with a buyer. The post was in no way inflammatory or in violation of any protocols. My post turned red as I posted, disappeared immediately, and blocked me. I am done with them

  • Members 72 posts
    May 20, 2023, 9:24 a.m.

    No real surprise there. That's why I didn't post there for comments.
    Out of interest which part of the forum did you post to?

  • Members 23 posts
    May 20, 2023, 9:34 a.m.

    This site seems so much better, not sure why anyone wants to buy the DPreview one. It looks really old and is hard to use.

    San x

  • Members 39 posts
    May 22, 2023, 12:29 p.m.

    I was able to access DPReview this morning but it seems to be gone now. I'm redirected to a FB site.

    PS: It's back again. LOL...