Will you stay here if DPReview revives?

  • 85 votes.
  • Voting ends 2 years ago.
  • Started by AlanSh 2 years ago.
Stay here and enjoy the posts
undefined votes, undefined% of total.
  • 32 votes, 38% of total.
Go back to DPReview and enjoy the [psts
undefined votes, undefined% of total.
  • 11 votes, 13% of total.
Visit both
undefined votes, undefined% of total.
  • 42 votes, 50% of total.
  • bobn2panorama_fish_eye
    2 years ago

    This site runs on PostgreSQL. Not being a DB man, I don't know how they compare. But I read that Postgre does have some advantages in this kind of application.

  • JACShelp_outline
    878 posts
    2 years ago

    Likewise, if they do not close, will you keep maintaining this site or you will close it?

  • Dibyendupanorama_fish_eye
    139 posts
    2 years ago

    The main advantage of PostgreSQL is cost.

    If the DPreview code is still on SQL Server (assuming they didn't migrate to Amazon's AWS DB) - then it may have code that is not compatible with PostgreSQL anyway. Also - most likely DPReview.com runs primarily on .NET.

    This is from DPreview job ad in 2007:

    • Primary development language: ASP.NET 2.0 (VBScript)
    • Primary development tools: Microsoft Visual Studio 2005, Dreamweaver, Photoshop
    • Other languages: Javascript, SQL (SQL Server 2000 & 2005)
    • Web standards: DHTML, XHTML, CSS, table-free CSS, AJAX

    2008:

    • Primary development language: ASP.NET 2.0 (VBScript)
    • Primary development tools: Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 / 2005, SQL (Server 2005)

    2011:

    • Maintain a solid understanding of site architecture (ASP.NET MVC, ASP.NET, ASP, SQL Server, AWS/EC2, HTML, CSS, JavaScript)
  • Gregpanorama_fish_eye
    511 posts
    2 years ago

    @JACS

    Of course it won’t close.
    You don’t create a photography forum and attract a membership of close to 4000 in just over one month, and then kill it.

    Why would think of such a thing.
    The mind boggles.

  • AlanShpanorama_fish_eye
    2 years ago

    Yes, while there are still people who want to stay here (and assuming we can afford it).

    Alan

  • Dibyendupanorama_fish_eye
    139 posts
    2 years ago

    I think a paid membership model would hopefully provide the funds needed?

  • XRaypanorama_fish_eye
    159 posts
    2 years ago

    Just did the same. And cancelled my Prime membership.

  • JACShelp_outline
    878 posts
    2 years ago

    It would be OK to run some ads to pay the bills.

  • bobn2panorama_fish_eye
    2 years ago

    That's not what either my DB man or my knowledge of MS products in general says.

    It was a Microsoft house. Not the best choice for Web service, and caught them out quite often.

  • bobn2panorama_fish_eye
    2 years ago

    What our bank account is running people can apply for Foundation membership and/or make a donation.

  • bobn2panorama_fish_eye
    2 years ago

    I get the impression that's contentions. If we were just using Google AdSense we'd get an income and the ads wouldn't directly affect out editorial stance.

  • Dannyhelp_outline
    435 posts
    2 years ago

    Any idea roughly when that needs to be done Bob?

    Danny.

  • bobn2panorama_fish_eye
    2 years ago

    Up to the bank, they need to do their due diligence. So far as the site, it can continue on the present basis for at least a year, but if we want to put in place some plans, we'll need a bank balance.

  • NeilT3panorama_fish_eye
    48 posts
    2 years ago

    Just not ads for amazon ! ;)

  • TheDavinatorpanorama_fish_eye
    621 posts
    2 years ago

    Any idea what the annual cost for the site will look like?

  • primeshooterpanorama_fish_eye
    217 posts
    2 years ago

    Dpreview should £^£& or get off the pot. It was closing on an announced date which was weeks ago. Yet it is still open with some we are backing up guff as the reason?

    Dpreview died years ago as a forum where we could have serious unbiased free flowing discussion. What would be the point in returning to dpreview? To watch threads get closed deleted or modified at their whims? To get banned for a month for making your point? Their overly sensitive rules? No thankyou sir. This place has been a welcome delight. For the most part no one has really overstepped the mark (except for maybe that time recently someone called someone else a dick) and it doesn't feel like a crèche. I'd say that it is working fairly well, so far.

  • simplejoyhelp_outline
    1662 posts
    2 years ago

    I really appreciate the different approach of dprevived and so my plan is to stay here and not go back to dpreview, even if it is kept alive... That being said, I'm afraid that most people of the subforum I was (almost exclusively) active in, might stay on dpreview in that case, or perhaps even go to dprforum. After taking an extended (and I'd say open-minded) look at what's the spirit there, I've pretty much decided that I'm not going to register there ever.

    So thumbs up for everyone involved in the creation of dprevived - I hope it will be a success and while I doubt I have as much to contribute as a lot of other people here, I'm certainly willing to help out.

  • tetrickypanorama_fish_eye
    5 posts
    2 years ago

    You might be interested in this comparison.

    Postgresql is a very able enterprise level open source relational database supporting a large number of tools. It is available to cheaply self host on most common platforms, right through to being able to be purchased as a service on a scalable HA managed platform. It integrates well with many server and applications platforms and programming languages.

    In my view it is a better technical choice for a web application, which might want to start small and then be trivially scaled up, than SQL-server. Unless you are particularly wedded to a Microsoft stack - which itself will likely impose technical and licensing limitations.