• Members 861 posts
    Oct. 6, 2023, 3 p.m.

    Witches gather in their masses...

    img_9111_witchesgatherintheirmasses_$100_$33_72dpi_web.jpg

  • Members 1743 posts
    Oct. 6, 2023, 3:42 p.m.

    OpenCube,

    The picture with the orange sky looks like it's from the same field as shown for the witches. I like the blue sky better.

  • Members 54 posts
    Oct. 6, 2023, 3:51 p.m.

    Nothing postworthy regarding this photo. I've just been experimenting with Canon picture styles in camera and additional color tweaks in DPP4. Coming from smartphones I'm use to oversaturated photos, so I'm working to move away from that. In your opinion does this picture come across as oversaturated?

    Camera: Canon EOS M200/Canon
    ISO320 24mm 1/15s 𝑓/4.5

    Edit: Wow I just noticed this site uploaded the full 5MB picture, I expected it to compress the image. Guess I should have done that beforehand?

  • Members 1743 posts
    Oct. 6, 2023, 4:08 p.m.

    DaveNJ,

    I don't think the flowers are oversaturated. At least it does not look like that to me.

  • Members 1743 posts
    Oct. 6, 2023, 4:10 p.m.

    OpenCube,

    That's creative to add in the lightning strike. I assume the field color was different when you took the picture.

  • Members 1743 posts
    Oct. 6, 2023, 4:11 p.m.

    OpenCube,

    I like seeing the picture of the statue. Where was this taken?

  • Members 861 posts
    Oct. 6, 2023, 4:18 p.m.

    Full spectrum image so it's not that far off from starting point, but those colors are not real to life.

  • Members 861 posts
    Oct. 6, 2023, 4:19 p.m.

    Dixon Gardens.

  • Members 1743 posts
    Oct. 6, 2023, 6:04 p.m.

    David,

    That's interesting that you know so much about the Seilerstätte 22 building. I see the number 22 next to the door up high. Where did you find that old photo, so you could make a comparison?

  • Members 1743 posts
    Oct. 6, 2023, 6:11 p.m.

    David,

    That memorial to Georg Coch looks huge. Is it about 40 feet high? It must be impressive to see in person.

  • Oct. 6, 2023, 6:16 p.m.

    Digi,

    I have a book of old photos of Vienna, and I find some of them quite interesting. Some of the places are quite unchanged, and others are very different (often because of war damage). But even in the latter case, one can often see tell tale signs from small details of the architecture that it is the same building. In this case, the address had not changed and one can see architectural details. I plan to show some other comparisons. I find the background information on the internet, often on pages only in German.

    Research into music and musicians is one of the professional hats that I wear: this requires a similar mindset.

    David

  • Oct. 6, 2023, 8:43 p.m.

    Hi Digi!

    LOL! It's a question of perspective and angles. Here is the uncropped version:

    IMG_7046_b2.jpg

    As you can see from this, I was standing back from the memorial. I couldnt get any further back because some idiot from the town hall has placed a pole in the sidewalk bang in front of the memorial with No Parking or something on it. The ground in the square behind the bust is at a higher level (about 5-6ft or 1.5-1.8 meters) than the sidewalk I was standing on. This is probably because this area of the city is where the city walls and ramparts used to be before about 1870. So what you are seeing is a view of the bust from below, and the 250 feet (75 meters) or so from there to the Postsparkasse building make the bust look taller. I reckon it is 15-20 ft (4.6 - 6.1 metres) tall. For reference, the aluminum figures at each end of the roof are 4.3 meters tall. You can estimate the height of the monument by knowing that the lens was about 5.5 ft above the sidewalk, and horizontal. So you can see where it is looking and take it from there, I'll leave you to do the math! 😄

    Another interesting detail is that the two buildings on left and right look as if they might be leaning. I was worried about that, as I tried to take great care to get the verticals correct. In the end I realised that the buildings actually move inwards for their upper stories!

    David

    IMG_7046_b2.jpg

    JPG, 3.3 MB, uploaded by davidwien on Oct. 6, 2023.

  • Members 732 posts
    Oct. 7, 2023, 12:28 a.m.

    While these pictures are nice enough, I uploaded them because I am trying to learn about long exposure photography.

    The clouds were scuttling across the sky, and I wanted to see if I could create wispy clouds and get cloud trails out of them.

    I put on a 3 stop ND filter, but It only dropped the shutter speed down to 1/80th of a second. Not enuogh to give me the blurring efffect I wanted.

    The ISO was already at 100 or 125, so I really couldn't adjust that. I had my aperture uat f/7.1. I could have closed that down couple of stops to f/9 or f/11. I would have gained a couple more stops of shutter speed down to 1/50th or 1/40th, but I can see I need to invest in a 10 stop filter if I want to take multi-second or even multi-minute exposures in the daytime.

    IMG_7257.JPG

    IMG_7258.JPG

    Steve Thomas

    IMG_7258.JPG

    JPG, 7.0 MB, uploaded by stevet1 on Oct. 7, 2023.

    IMG_7257.JPG

    JPG, 7.7 MB, uploaded by stevet1 on Oct. 6, 2023.

  • Oct. 7, 2023, 1:05 p.m.

    Text with emphasis

    Steve,

    Two things are definitely required to achieve your goal:

    1. The right kind of clouds.

    2. A tripod. (A remote shutter release is also useful to prevent movement.)

    To get a longer exposure, there is no reason not to use f/22. If you have two linear polarising filters, you can use both of them to create a variable ND filter. Another option is to take several long exposure shots in quick successsion and combine them.

    Best wishes,

    David

  • Members 732 posts
    Oct. 7, 2023, 2:21 p.m.

    David,

    Yeah, I had one long, thin, streaky cloud I was going to use, but by the time I had my tripod set up, it had moved on.

    I never thought about going as high as f/22. I'll have to try that sometime. I have a 3 stop and and a CPL (which would have given me an extra 1 66), .f/22 is 10 stops up from f/7.1, so combining that with the filters might just do the trick.

    I just did a little experiment.

    In broad daylight with bright sun shiny skies, adding a 3 stop filter, setting the ISO to 100, and stopping down the aperture to f/22 gave me a shutter speed of 1/5 of a second. I still think I need a stronger ND filter if I want to go to something like a second or more. (or wait till a different time of day 😀}.

    Steve Thomas

  • Oct. 7, 2023, 2:45 p.m.

    "f/22 is 10 stops up from f/7.1"

    How do you make that out, Steve? 22->16->11->8 is three stops by my reckoning, so for the same value of ISO, going from f/8 to f/22 needs 1/8 of the shutter speed for the same exposure. As you say, not enough.

    I have four ND8 filters, which are the normal ones (3 stops). I have never used them, and cannot find them! I believe that you can get 10 stop ones from Hoya; but I cant find their catalog, either!

    For an experiment, you can always try rigging up the polarised lens of sunglasses over a polariser, and rotating it... 😀

    David

  • Members 732 posts
    Oct. 7, 2023, 5:17 p.m.

    My camera goes from 8.0>9.0>10.0>11.0>13.0>14.0>16.0>18.0>20.0>22.0
    I guess these are 1/3 stops? Come to think of it, I have my camera set to 1/3 increments.

    B&H carries a pretty good line.

    Steve Thomas

  • Oct. 7, 2023, 5:54 p.m.

    Yes, 1/3rd stop intervals, for which I see no need. I suggest you reset it to 1 stop intervals.

    David

  • Oct. 7, 2023, 8:55 p.m.

    Welcome, Dave! This is a nice shot, and I encourage you to visit us regularly. Comparison between your camera and phone of the same subject would be interesting.

    I usually downsize my files to 2000-2500 pixels along the long side. This brings them down to about 3MB, while still leaving them large enough when displayed at full size.

    David

  • Oct. 7, 2023, 9:03 p.m.

    Simplejoy started this week with a plant that had broken through concrete, together with a mysterious macro shot of a peanut.

    Steve Thomas, learning from his earlier attempts, countered with two photos of the moon. Later he took photos of goldenrod, experimenting all the time, this time taking some nice studies with a 50mm lens. He has now moved on to the challenge of long exposures on clouds against bright skies.

    At the beginning of September, Digrame took photos at the Oregon State Fair and rounded up his best shots for us. Later he went looking for, and found, wood ducks -- not swimming, but sitting on a dead branch in the sun. This was followed by a superb picture of a crow. Great shots and great variety!

    Photobygms was back home in the Netherlands and showed us some interesting plant life, including one photo of a spectacular spider's web.

    I was up next with photos of Vienna's Michaelerplatz under lovely afternoon sun. Later I showed two other churches from the same afternoon. Chestnuts, or conkers, are falling fast here and it is hard to avoid being hit by them, or stepping on them in the streets. I showed some that I couldnt avoid picking up. Later I presented some comparative photos of other local landmarks that I had found in a book of old photos from 100 years ago. More of these are planned.

    OpenCube found us a lovely pink flower with an appropriately non competing background, and followed up later with a surreally coloured country scene! His stone statue of a child was also strangely placed in a country setting, rther than on a church or memorial. we are still waiting to here how that happened. He then moved on to another picture in another strange country with a tale of witches attached to it. He has a great eye for the unusual!

    Dunlin's woodland scene showed little evidence of autumnal colours as yet.

    Welcome to DaveNJ, who is transitioning from his smartphone to get more natural styles. You are welcome to join us and exhibit regularly.

    The new weekly thread is open here. Please start using it now.