Agreed. I mis-spoke. What I meant to say is that to the mathematically uninitiated, a mathematical discussion may not be understood, whilst it maybe relatively easily explained, at least in outline, in other ways. It's a matter of communication.
They're not just visibly orange/amber-ish, they also give off significant IR, which has caused them to be demonized for inefficiency, which is certainly true during air conditioning season, where one electric draw is fighting another, which is ridiculous. However, there is lots of evidence to suggest that IR is necessary for optimal health, and when people stay indoors during winter, they may be the better bulb, because they give off IR that people otherwise wouldn't be exposed to if they stayed indoors during winter, or are completely covered in the little time they are outdoors. Also, warmer light enables greater melatonin generation in the evening. The inefficiency is completely irrelevant during winter, if thermostats control the heating, because the "inefficient bulbs" are no worse than electric heat; you can think of electric heat as an extremely inefficient bulb that gives off no visible light.
Gas/oil heating, of course, is not the same as electric, but electric is a rough proxy for them in terms of energy, and they can also be driven by thermostats
Just don't put the bulbs in the windows, and all the energy that they "consume" to make light, as free lunch, on the way to heat.